ImageImage

Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,916
And1: 29,834
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#421 » by Ron Swanson » Mon Oct 20, 2025 1:25 pm

Frustration in the Browns and Bengals games was justified. Cardinals are a pretty decent team that's just gotten really unlucky this year. This was a good road win.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 104,474
And1: 56,624
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#422 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Oct 20, 2025 1:27 pm

Most here seemed fine with going for it on 4th (since it worked). If it hadn't worked MLF would have got roasted for "not taking the sure points". That's how it goes lol.

4-1-1 feels just as good this morning as it did last night. 30 teams wish they had our record.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,916
And1: 29,834
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#423 » by Ron Swanson » Mon Oct 20, 2025 1:41 pm

I'm glad they went for it and would have been regardless of the outcome, but thank god they converted because it's inexcusable by MLF to waste a timeout there with 2:32 left on the clock just because you're indecisive.

Hobbs was brutal, but both our big free agent acquisitions this offseason have really been absolute duds. Definitely the biggest whiff in an otherwise great offseason by Gute, but the secondary is officially a problem, and I'd at least start kicking the tires on what's available on the market or who can come in off the street.
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,723
And1: 4,566
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#424 » by MVP2110 » Mon Oct 20, 2025 1:44 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:Most here seemed fine with going for it on 4th (since it worked). If it hadn't worked MLF would have got roasted for "not taking the sure points". That's how it goes lol.

4-1-1 feels just as good this morning as it did last night. 30 teams wish they had our record.


I'm mad he wasted a timeout but going for it was absolutely the right call regardless of whether they got it or not. Kicking a fg to tie and giving the ball back go Arizona with 2 min and timeouts with them only needing to get into FG range would have been a terrible idea
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
UWM_Brew_Buck
Analyst
Posts: 3,130
And1: 898
Joined: Jan 26, 2009
Location: Not in the EMS Building
     

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#425 » by UWM_Brew_Buck » Mon Oct 20, 2025 1:47 pm

I would saw I lean conservative in risk situations but I think going for it there was the only smart play. At best go into a coin flip OT and Giving the Cards 2+ mins to win the game was not the right call. Hell of a throw and catch and glad they changed their mind. Still crazy that we a game saving TO to think it over. Hopefully this can get them out of their time management/risk funk.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,321
And1: 42,541
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#426 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Oct 20, 2025 1:51 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,945
And1: 4,458
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#427 » by BUCKnation » Mon Oct 20, 2025 2:13 pm

Would have been happy to go for it either way, was only upset that we wasted a timeout due to the indecision and that we were even in that position in the first place because of that stupid pitch play.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,525
And1: 8,100
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#428 » by Mags FTW » Mon Oct 20, 2025 2:15 pm

Wonder what the trade market for Havrisik will be when McManus comes back...
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 104,474
And1: 56,624
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#429 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Oct 20, 2025 2:20 pm

Mags FTW wrote:Wonder what the trade market for Havrisik will be when McManus comes back...

He would definitely get a late round pick. Giants perhaps?
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
CWoodfan
Junior
Posts: 377
And1: 327
Joined: Aug 30, 2017
 

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#430 » by CWoodfan » Mon Oct 20, 2025 2:30 pm

2:30 to play, Jacobs had just had a good run to get the Pack to 3rd and 1 and MLF calls for a pitch out with Jacobs behind leading blocker ... Luke Musgrave ... who unsurprisingly fails, a true WTF call?

OK everyone makes a mistake, but then MLF trots out the FG unit and burns a TO while dithering about what he should do ... in year 7?

Thank God MLF belatedly grew a pair and let his 6th year QB try and make a play, which Jordan thankfully did.

Anyone think "meathead" Dan Campbell or Andy Reid hesitates to go for it in that position or that their players would have any worry that their HC would have had the cajones to do the right thing?
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,723
And1: 4,566
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#431 » by MVP2110 » Mon Oct 20, 2025 4:54 pm

PFF grades(min 10 snaps)

Offense

Best
1. Zach Tom 74.3
2. Rasheed Walker 72.1
3. Josh Jacobs 71.2
4. Matthew Golden 67.1
5. Romeo Doubs 65.8

Worst
1. Jordan Morgan 34.8
2. Luke Musgrave 42.3
3. John Fitzpatrick 46
4. Malik Heath 50.6
5. Jordan Love 53.5


Defense

Best
1. Micah Parsons 92.6
2. Colby Wooden 86
3. Isaiah Mcduffie 80.2
4. Xavier Mckinney 77.9
5. Javon Bullard 73

Worst
1. Barryn Sorrell 40
2. Nate Hobbs 47.9
3. Edgerrin Cooper 49.8
4. Keisean Nixon 57.7
5. Quay Walker 58.6
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 9,017
And1: 5,071
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#432 » by RRyder823 » Mon Oct 20, 2025 5:18 pm

The more Hobbs plays the more im convinced I was right when I said barring injury he shouldn't be playing outside of dime packages

Valentine needs to be the starter on the outside next to Nixon. Man has done nothing but improve since being drafted and has played good when given the chance

Bullard has played good as the nickel slot corner

Hobbs isn't better then Valentine on the outside.

He isnt better then Bullard in the slot.

He should be our dime cb and its why I didnt see the point on signing him from the word go.



Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app
Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 20,777
And1: 8,448
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#433 » by Profound23 » Mon Oct 20, 2025 5:24 pm

RRyder823 wrote:The more Hobbs plays the more im convinced I was right when I said barring injury he shouldn't be playing outside of dime packages

Valentine needs to be the starter on the outside next to Nixon. Man has done nothing but improve since being drafted and has played good when given the chance

Bullard has played good as the nickel slot corner

Hobbs isn't better then Valentine on the outside.

He isnt better then Bullard in the slot.

He should be our dime cb and its why I didnt see the point on signing him from the word go.



Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app


Nobody can call this a 20/20 revisionist history thing because A LOT of the board was confused by this signing. Watching Stokes play well for one year, 4 mil as the replacement of Hobbs in Vegas is even worse. Banks and Hobbs seemed like signings just to be doing something and neither have looked great so far.
Treebeard
General Manager
Posts: 7,877
And1: 1,969
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Out in the Driftless Area
     

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#434 » by Treebeard » Mon Oct 20, 2025 5:27 pm

MVP2110 wrote:PFF grades(min 10 snaps)

Offense

Best
1. Zach Tom 74.3
2. Rasheed Walker 72.1
3. Josh Jacobs 71.2
4. Matthew Golden 67.1
5. Romeo Doubs 65.8

Worst
1. Jordan Morgan 34.8
2. Luke Musgrave 42.3
3. John Fitzpatrick 46
4. Malik Heath 50.6
5. Jordan Love 53.5


Defense

Best
1. Micah Parsons 92.6
2. Colby Wooden 86
3. Isaiah Mcduffie 80.2
4. Xavier Mckinney 77.9
5. Javon Bullard 73

Worst
1. Barryn Sorrell 40
2. Nate Hobbs 47.9
3. Edgerrin Cooper 49.8
4. Keisean Nixon 57.7
5. Quay Walker 58.6


I'm a little surprised at Morgan's terrible score.

Musgrave, to my eyes has had a disappointing season in all facets so far.

Cooper seems to be in a sophomore slump to this point
*******************************************************
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,723
And1: 4,566
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#435 » by MVP2110 » Mon Oct 20, 2025 5:29 pm

I sort of get the feeling that Gutey had money burning a hole in his pocket this last offseason. It was a bad free agent class and he tried to find 2 younger guys that could fill needs on the roster. But it's pretty clear that he overspent considerably on both and would have been better off just trying to find cheaper 1 year guys or saving that money for future extensions
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 9,017
And1: 5,071
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#436 » by RRyder823 » Mon Oct 20, 2025 5:30 pm

Profound23 wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:The more Hobbs plays the more im convinced I was right when I said barring injury he shouldn't be playing outside of dime packages

Valentine needs to be the starter on the outside next to Nixon. Man has done nothing but improve since being drafted and has played good when given the chance

Bullard has played good as the nickel slot corner

Hobbs isn't better then Valentine on the outside.

He isnt better then Bullard in the slot.

He should be our dime cb and its why I didnt see the point on signing him from the word go.



Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app


Nobody can call this a 20/20 revisionist history thing because A LOT of the board was confused by this signing. Watching Stokes play well for one year, 4 mil as the replacement of Hobbs in Vegas is even worse. Banks and Hobbs seemed like signings just do be doing something and neither have looked great so far.
I could at least see the argument for the Banks signing. OK MLF wants more of a road grater at guard cause he likes to run the ball. Ok. over paid but I can see the vision even if I dont agree with it

Hobbs was "ok. so we just made him the most expensive dime CB in the league. awesome"...... Im a partially wrong on that so far since they insist on him playing as the starter because reasons

Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,916
And1: 29,834
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#437 » by Ron Swanson » Mon Oct 20, 2025 5:36 pm

Hobbs has been brutal but Vallentine sure as hell hasn't played like he's the answer there either. I think we were all fine letting Stokes go, but I don't know why they didn't keep someone like Corey Ballentine around for some veteran insurance. If you're also not gonna throw Melton out there occasionally for some coverage snaps, then I have no idea why we even bothered to convert him to corner in the first place.
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 9,017
And1: 5,071
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#438 » by RRyder823 » Mon Oct 20, 2025 5:40 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:Hobbs has been brutal but Vallentine sure as hell hasn't played like he's the answer there either. I think we were all fine letting Stokes go, but I don't know why they didn't keep someone like Corey Ballentine around for some veteran insurance. If you're also not gonna throw Melton out there occasionally for some coverage snaps, then I have no idea why we even bothered to convert him to corner in the first place.
Depends what you think the "answer" is but dissagree on Valentine. He played more then fine in the role the first few weeks before his snaps got taken away by Hobbs return from injury

Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app
raysbookclub
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,829
And1: 1,299
Joined: Jan 26, 2008
     

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#439 » by raysbookclub » Mon Oct 20, 2025 6:17 pm

Yeah I understand the vision for Banks, getting a huge G to maul dudes in front of Jacobs. Like the Eagles’ huge G. He hasn’t been good, but I think he could get better as the season goes on, esp after the injury early.

I always give GB GMs the benefit of the doubt, so Hobbs seemed fine at the time, a solid slot they paid like a top slot, who they thought they could teach to play well outside. He has been bad on the outside. Maybe he’s still recovering from the knee? Gotta be able to run to play outside CB, and maybe with meniscus repairs it takes a while to get speed and acceleration back.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 104,474
And1: 56,624
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Game 6: Packers at Cardinals - 10/19/25 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#440 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Oct 20, 2025 6:38 pm

Hobbs has been bad. It's revisionist to say we should have kept Stokes though. Stokes played a total of 12 games in 2022 and 2023. And while healthy last year he wasn't good. But Hobbs wasn't very good last year either so signing him was a head scratcher.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.

Return to Green Bay Packers