Bernman wrote:JimmyTheKid wrote:Well I've never said "Love sucks" in my life. This has never been about Jordan Love, at least not to me. It was always about Aaron Rodgers being an open book with the organization. Telling them straight up "I want to play well into my 40's." And then watching the organization trade up for a 1st round QB 8 years before Rodgers is "well into his 40's." F***ing amateur hour.
That's actually very professional. Amateur hour would be to not set yourself up for life after your star QB, as the Packers did 15 years ago to create the stability you enjoy, & the Patriots sort of had w/ Jimmy G. These weren't professional organizations?
Speaking of the Patriots, they probably regret now not re-popping on the qb transition plan a few years before Brady left too. And the Packers could just end up trading Love like the Pats did Jimmy G, if Rodgers is still firing on all cylinders, + Love doesn't appear near his level for the future.
It's ironic Rodgers playing well now would be used as ammo against the strategy to draft a QB 2 years ago. Because beforehand Rodgers was underachieving. He almost doubled his TD total the year after Love was drafted. Don't think it's a coincidence he's found some new motivation. Plays well w/ a chip on his shoulder. You don't need to have one for him.
And well into your 40's was not 8 years. It was five. Plans change too. He could be physically or mentally beaten by then. Brady is an anomaly. Manning broke down before he was 40. And then it didn't matter if he wanted to continue or not.
The only mistake the Packers made is with communication. And it's not neglecting to relay this was a possibility beforehand, because it may have not come to fruition. Afterward everything I said, and more, could have been explained to Rodgers. He'd still heavily control if he was here long-term, based on his play. The rest is Love's, but Rodgers himself 15 years ago set a high standard.
"Set yourself up for life after your star QB" is all fine and dandy when your star QB is nearing the end of his career. Not all NFL lifetimes are created equal. At age 35, Rodgers stated he wanted to play, again, "well into his 40's." Its disingenuous to say 41 years old is "well into someone's 40's."
And, again, comparing the Rodgers situation to the Favre situation continues to be so, so lazy. Favre waffled for three years about retirement, holding the organization hostage with the draft and free agency. Rodgers flat out told the organization his long term intentions.
You say the communication is only mistake the Packers made. Which, yeah, that was a big one. But the colossal mistake was betting against a guy they watch play football more than anyone else. Its almost as if they looked at the stats on the back of Rodgers' football card and said, "he's done, time to find another QB" instead of asking more nuanced questions. "Is the arm talent still there?" "The ability to navigate the pocket and extend plays?" "The accuracy?" "The mobility?" "Might it be the offense thats getting stale?" Again, embarrassing isn't even the right word. Humiliating is closer.

















