College Football Discussion - CFP Set
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 108,848
- And1: 42,926
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
This game has ruled.
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
-
Mtsportsfan
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,371
- And1: 414
- Joined: Oct 21, 2017
-
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
Pretty crappy games ! Hope the OSU - Tenn game is good!
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 112,526
- And1: 28,198
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
lol nice calls Clemson
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
-
Mtsportsfan
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,371
- And1: 414
- Joined: Oct 21, 2017
-
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
Left the Texas game early , looked like a blow out! I see it tightened up!
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 108,848
- And1: 42,926
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
Yea, Clemson choked late.
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
-
PintSizedBox10
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,450
- And1: 3,781
- Joined: Mar 31, 2019
-
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
Clemson had his forward progress stopped for an entire second. Blow the damn whistle
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
- Matches Malone
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,734
- And1: 27,943
- Joined: Nov 23, 2005
-
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
-
PintSizedBox10
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,450
- And1: 3,781
- Joined: Mar 31, 2019
-
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
How do you not call that PI. Refs are ruining football
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
-
midranger
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,055
- And1: 11,736
- Joined: May 12, 2002
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
The sarcastic SEC chant must continue. Don’t let ESPN cut away from it
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
-
Mags FTW
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,686
- And1: 8,234
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
Maybe we should just do eight teams.
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
-
MVP2110
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,911
- And1: 4,705
- Joined: Jun 28, 2012
- Location: Appleton WI
-
Re: College Football Discussion - Belichick to UNC
Mags FTW wrote:Maybe we should just do eight teams.
Eh, in the 4 team CFP 67% of games were 2+ score games. Blowouts are just more of a thing in college football.
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod

- Posts: 106,026
- And1: 57,954
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
Disappointing first round. Hopefully the quarterfinals are more competitive.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 112,526
- And1: 28,198
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
12 is fine but they need to get rid of power 4 conference champ gets automatic top 4 seed and there should be home games through the quarterfinals. Arizona State and Boise State should have had to play this weekend and Oregon should not have to play Ohio State as their "reward" for getting the top seed.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod

- Posts: 106,026
- And1: 57,954
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
20 of 30 games in the 4 team CFP were decided by double digits.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
-
MVP2110
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,911
- And1: 4,705
- Joined: Jun 28, 2012
- Location: Appleton WI
-
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
trwi7 wrote:12 is fine but they need to get rid of power 4 conference champ gets automatic top 4 seed and there should be home games through the quarterfinals. Arizona State and Boise State should have had to play this weekend and Oregon should not have to play Ohio State as their "reward" for getting the top seed.
Nah, conference champs should absolutely get rewarded. Just reseed after R1 so Texas doesnt get rewarded for losing their conference championship game. If you want a bye then win your conference
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 112,526
- And1: 28,198
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
MVP2110 wrote:trwi7 wrote:12 is fine but they need to get rid of power 4 conference champ gets automatic top 4 seed and there should be home games through the quarterfinals. Arizona State and Boise State should have had to play this weekend and Oregon should not have to play Ohio State as their "reward" for getting the top seed.
Nah, conference champs should absolutely get rewarded.
They're rewarded by making it. They should not be rewarded by getting a guaranteed QF spot over better teams.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
-
MVP2110
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,911
- And1: 4,705
- Joined: Jun 28, 2012
- Location: Appleton WI
-
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
trwi7 wrote:MVP2110 wrote:trwi7 wrote:12 is fine but they need to get rid of power 4 conference champ gets automatic top 4 seed and there should be home games through the quarterfinals. Arizona State and Boise State should have had to play this weekend and Oregon should not have to play Ohio State as their "reward" for getting the top seed.
Nah, conference champs should absolutely get rewarded.
They're rewarded by making it. They should not be rewarded by getting a guaranteed QF spot over better teams.
They absolutely should. To win your conference you have to win an extra game during the season, winning that extra conference championship game should guarentee you having to play 1 less playoff game. If the conference championships didn't guarantee a bye then there would have been no reason for Oregon, Georgia, Texas, Penn St etc to try during the conference title games and Notre Dame would get a bonus for not being in a conference
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 112,526
- And1: 28,198
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
MVP2110 wrote:trwi7 wrote:MVP2110 wrote:
Nah, conference champs should absolutely get rewarded.
They're rewarded by making it. They should not be rewarded by getting a guaranteed QF spot over better teams.
They absolutely should. To win your conference you have to win an extra game during the season, winning that extra conference championship game should guarentee you having to play 1 less playoff game. If the conference championships didn't guarantee a bye then there would have been no reason for Oregon, Georgia, Texas, Penn St etc to try during the conference title games and Notre Dame would get a bonus for not being in a conference
You could also end up getting like a 9-5 team getting a bye. Reseeding doesn't work either because reseeding this year would still have Oregon playing Ohio State.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
-
MVP2110
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,911
- And1: 4,705
- Joined: Jun 28, 2012
- Location: Appleton WI
-
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
trwi7 wrote:MVP2110 wrote:trwi7 wrote:
They're rewarded by making it. They should not be rewarded by getting a guaranteed QF spot over better teams.
They absolutely should. To win your conference you have to win an extra game during the season, winning that extra conference championship game should guarentee you having to play 1 less playoff game. If the conference championships didn't guarantee a bye then there would have been no reason for Oregon, Georgia, Texas, Penn St etc to try during the conference title games and Notre Dame would get a bonus for not being in a conference
You could also end up getting like a 9-5 team getting a bye. Reseeding doesn't work either because reseeding this year would still have Oregon playing Ohio State.
Boise St was ranked 9 & Arizona St was 11. If you reseeded you'd have
1. Oregon vs 11. Arizona St
2. Georgia vs 9. Boise St
3. Texas vs 6. Ohio St
4. Penn St vs 5. Notre Dame
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 112,526
- And1: 28,198
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: College Football Discussion - CFP
MVP2110 wrote:trwi7 wrote:MVP2110 wrote:
They absolutely should. To win your conference you have to win an extra game during the season, winning that extra conference championship game should guarentee you having to play 1 less playoff game. If the conference championships didn't guarantee a bye then there would have been no reason for Oregon, Georgia, Texas, Penn St etc to try during the conference title games and Notre Dame would get a bonus for not being in a conference
You could also end up getting like a 9-5 team getting a bye. Reseeding doesn't work either because reseeding this year would still have Oregon playing Ohio State.
Boise St was ranked 9 & Arizona St was 11. If you reseeded you'd have
1. Oregon vs 11. Arizona St
2. Georgia vs 9. Boise St
3. Texas vs 6. Ohio St
4. Penn St vs 5. Notre Dame
That's re-ranking. Reseeding would be taking the seed they were given and moving them. Like if Indiana beat Notre Dame they would be playing Oregon. That's reseeding. What you're doing is basically what I'm saying should happen at bare minimum.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.





