humanrefutation wrote:What's the sense on the team's defensive recruiting and development? I've had this sneaking suspicion that both Wilcox and now Leonhard have benefited tremendously from the foundation laid by Aranda's recruiting and coaching work, and now that he's been gone for a few years and his guys have pretty much finished their college careers, you'll really start seeing how good of a recruiter and coach Jimmy Leonhard actually is.
We'll see this year. Wilcox has a very good defense already already at Cal (though I had read there was some harassment type stuff with him? So maybe it will be short-lived).
The verdict is somewhat out on Leonhard as I'd agree you need to see something a few years after the last regimes left, but I think similarly to Gard, it's hard to completely fudge your way through being that good even with a good recruiting/coaching work foundation being laid down. If you're truly a **** coach, your defense will suck even with really good players.
Aranda was only there from 2013-2015. I'm assuming he only recruited parts of the 2014 and 2015 class. They had some stalwarts in those such as Edwards, Sagapolu, most of the secondary (Dixon, Tindal, Jamerson), though.
Back to the original point - we'll see over the next year or two. They have a lot of talent that they've recruited in there. The entire secondary was forced into action last year as true freshmen/RS frosh and maybe a soph or two. The biggest concern that I have is the defensive line with injuries and depth. Jack Sanborn should be a stud at LB. Orr should be good (trimmed way down) in his final year. I am pretty certain that the secondary will have 3-4 solid (or better) players emerge. I'm not sure if we'll get another stud OLB in there until I see it...and we had like 6 of them between 2012 and 2017.
Schedule may kill them this year, regardless. Might have a nice 9-3 or 10-2 caliber team that goes 7-5. Thems the breaks, of course. It's not like we're in the SEC West every year.