ImageImage

GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 104,911
And1: 57,039
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#81 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:05 am

OL stinks so far
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
raysbookclub
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,840
And1: 1,308
Joined: Jan 26, 2008
     

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#82 » by raysbookclub » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:05 am

Nice punt!!!
PintSizedBox10
Head Coach
Posts: 7,302
And1: 3,715
Joined: Mar 31, 2019
   

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#83 » by PintSizedBox10 » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:05 am

Elite oline my ass.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
LikeABosh
RealGM
Posts: 19,187
And1: 8,895
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
     

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#84 » by LikeABosh » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:05 am

TroyD92 wrote:
LikeABosh wrote:
TroyD92 wrote:How could you possibly say there's no clear recovery?


Because they didn't do their job and declare a recovery when there was a pileup. You can't do it after the fact by replay


I haven't been paying that close of attention this year, but wasn't that supposed to be a major thing ? They weren't supposed to blow plays dead ?


Yes
Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 20,880
And1: 8,535
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#85 » by Profound23 » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:05 am

LikeABosh wrote:
TroyD92 wrote:How could you possibly say there's no clear recovery?


Because they didn't do their job and declare a recovery when there was a pileup. You can't do it after the fact by replay


Then it shouldn't be reviewable. I still have no clue how we lost the challenge. They still overturned the call.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,259
And1: 15,090
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#86 » by Ayt » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:06 am

TroyD92 wrote:
LikeABosh wrote:
TroyD92 wrote:How could you possibly say there's no clear recovery?


Because they didn't do their job and declare a recovery when there was a pileup. You can't do it after the fact by replay


I haven't been paying that close of attention this year, but wasn't that supposed to be a major thing ? They weren't supposed to blow plays dead ?


It's the playoffs. It's time for the refs to **** up.
ACGB
RealGM
Posts: 10,757
And1: 2,877
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Location: 414
 

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#87 » by ACGB » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:06 am

Whoever is sitting next to the person shrieking over and over should be allowed 1 free punch.
User avatar
LikeABosh
RealGM
Posts: 19,187
And1: 8,895
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
     

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#88 » by LikeABosh » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:06 am

Fantastic punt
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,259
And1: 15,090
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#89 » by Ayt » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:07 am

MickeyDavis wrote:OL stinks so far


It has looked like communication errors so far. Hopefully, it's just nerves.
User avatar
LikeABosh
RealGM
Posts: 19,187
And1: 8,895
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
     

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#90 » by LikeABosh » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:07 am

Profound23 wrote:
LikeABosh wrote:
TroyD92 wrote:How could you possibly say there's no clear recovery?


Because they didn't do their job and declare a recovery when there was a pileup. You can't do it after the fact by replay


Then it shouldn't be reviewable. I still have no clue how we lost the challenge. They still overturned the call.


Exactly. I can handle refs making bad calls, but when their procedures make no **** sense it really pisses me off. No reason for it
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 33,168
And1: 16,844
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#91 » by humanrefutation » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:07 am

Profound23 wrote:
LikeABosh wrote:
TroyD92 wrote:How could you possibly say there's no clear recovery?


Because they didn't do their job and declare a recovery when there was a pileup. You can't do it after the fact by replay


Then it shouldn't be reviewable. I still have no clue how we lost the challenge. They still overturned the call.


Literally, the refs should tell MLF that it doesn't matter because there was no clear recovery and then just give us our TO back.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,259
And1: 15,090
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#92 » by Ayt » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:10 am

Get ****, Lynch.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 104,911
And1: 57,039
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#93 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:11 am

Can't squander the great defense. Need to go up 2 scores
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,259
And1: 15,090
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#94 » by Ayt » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:12 am

humanrefutation wrote:
Profound23 wrote:
LikeABosh wrote:
Because they didn't do their job and declare a recovery when there was a pileup. You can't do it after the fact by replay


Then it shouldn't be reviewable. I still have no clue how we lost the challenge. They still overturned the call.


Literally, the refs should tell MLF that it doesn't matter because there was no clear recovery and then just give us our TO back.


The replay system in the NFL makes no sense in general. Why is it the job of coaches to tell refs to review a potentially missed call?
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 104,911
And1: 57,039
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#95 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:12 am

Wearing down? IT'S THE PLAYOFFS
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 27,986
And1: 15,536
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: The Land of Giannis.
     

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#96 » by rilamann » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:12 am

Kenny Clark is the type of guy you want in a cold playoff game lol.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
User avatar
chuckleslove
RealGM
Posts: 18,566
And1: 1,128
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Location: In an RV down by the river
Contact:
     

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#97 » by chuckleslove » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:13 am

Weak ass OPI
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
ACGB
RealGM
Posts: 10,757
And1: 2,877
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Location: 414
 

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#98 » by ACGB » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:13 am

What the hell late flag was that?
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 104,911
And1: 57,039
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#99 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:13 am

Come on. Terrible call
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: GT: Seahawks at Packers - 5:40 - FOX 

Post#100 » by skones » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:13 am

What a **** joke.

Return to Green Bay Packers