Packers News, Transactions, Trade Talk - Jaire Released

Profound23 · Post #81 » by **Profound23** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 7:56 pm

I'm just confused, if we were going to give that much to an offensive guard why not Becton?

I'll trust Gutey. I loved his moves last year immediately with Jacobs and X. This one I'm scratching my head, but hopefully it works out.

Post #82 » by **ReasonablySober** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 7:56 pm

Read on Twitter

Post #83 » by **ReasonablySober** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 7:58 pm

M-C-G wrote:Didn’t see guard as a need. Wonder if that means Tom slides to C and they push Morgan to tackle?

I said as much in the draft thread when I voiced opposition to drafting an IOL only guy in the first two days. They have to get the five best guys on the field no matter what, and if that means moving Tom inside then they need to do it.

Post #84 » by **humanrefutation** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 7:59 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:

Read on Twitter

No guarantee except for the signing bonus, which makes a lot of sense. Still, surprised they didn't just target an IOL in the draft (Day 3, to be sure).

Profound23 · Post #85 » by **Profound23** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 8:03 pm

Yeah, that makes a lot more sense. Becton would not have agreed to that type of a deal. Good signing assuming the signing bonus is a decent number.

Ron Swanson · Post #86 » by **Ron Swanson** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 8:03 pm

This just seems like a "oh **** we got absolutely slaughtered by the Eagles pass rush (so did everyone else) so let's just pay whoever the top guard is" kind of move. Not a fan but whatever I guess. Not my money and you probably still trust this organization when it comes to building an offensive line.

Post #87 » by **ReasonablySober** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 8:04 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:This just seems like a "oh **** we got absolutely slaughtered by the Eagles pass rush (so did everyone else) so let's just pay whoever the top guard is" kind of move. Not a fan but whatever I guess. Not my money and you probably still trust this organization when it comes to building an offensive line.

Worth noting he seems to be much better as a run blocker than a pass blocker.

MVP2110 · Post #88 » by **MVP2110** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 8:07 pm

Read on Twitter

?t=BLk9QESr0NgzQ-W1xMgi5Q&s=19

Matches Malone · Post #89 » by **Matches Malone** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 8:10 pm

MVP2110 · Post #90 » by **MVP2110** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 8:12 pm

Silverstein reporting Jenkins will indeed slide over to C

Read on Twitter

?t=cUzTUjfnCbsY3Ks4WriJnQ&s=19

RRyder823 · Post #91 » by **RRyder823** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 8:34 pm

This is the type of deal you'd want to avoid and quite frankly mock rivals for doing

Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app

MVP2110 · Post #92 » by **MVP2110** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 8:36 pm

Read on Twitter

?t=fn8bvSyJnwLOQlu87GXu7g&s=19

MVP2110 · Post #93 » by **MVP2110** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 8:43 pm

Packers sign CB Nate Hobbs, 4/48

Read on Twitter

?t=q7IAlq-h7DYQXIqr3PfSCQ&s=19

Post #94 » by **humanrefutation** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 8:46 pm

Don't know much about Hobbs. From his wiki - Hobbs received an overall grade of 61.4 from Pro Football Focus in 2024, which ranked 110th amongst 223 cornerbacks.

Matches Malone · Post #95 » by **Matches Malone** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 8:47 pm

The Raiders pipeline continues.

M-C-G · Post #96 » by **M-C-G** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 8:55 pm

Wonder if they thought he projects better to boundary in our system.

RRyder823 · Post #97 » by **RRyder823** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 8:55 pm

These two moves are just depressing.

Just do nothing if this was all that was left. Nothing is an option

Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app

Ron Swanson · Post #98 » by **Ron Swanson** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 8:55 pm

9.62 RAS and only 25-years old. Can he play outside though?

Treebeard · Post #99 » by **Treebeard** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 8:57 pm

MVP2110 wrote:Packers sign CB Nate Hobbs, 4/48

Read on Twitter
?t=q7IAlq-h7DYQXIqr3PfSCQ&s=19

Sounds like a Biasaccia guy

Post #100 » by **ReasonablySober** » Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:00 pm

Read on Twitter