Chillar, Havner on IR
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:02 pm
@packers: The Green Bay Packers have placed LB Brandon Chillar and TE Spencer Havner on injured reserve: http://pckrs.com/2953
RealGM
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
Chillar, Havner on IR
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=161&t=1071341
Page 1 of 2
Re: Chiller, Havner on IR
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:03 pm
WTF happened to Chillar?? ****!
LOL at Havner.
LOL at Havner.
Re: Chiller, Havner on IR
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:04 pm
When the hell did Havner even get on the field? 
13 guys on IR. Anyone who loses to us from her on out should be ashamed and not be given a paycheck that week.
13 guys on IR. Anyone who loses to us from her on out should be ashamed and not be given a paycheck that week.
Re: Chiller, Havner on IR
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:05 pm
LMAO at Havner.
Re: Chiller, Havner on IR
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:06 pm
Jesus...
Re: Chiller, Havner on IR
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:07 pm
The Chillar one hurts. He gave us a 3rd ILB and is the best on the team at covering TE's.
Re: Chiller, Havner on IR
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:07 pm
It's actually 13 guys on the IR, according to the Packers twitter account.
Re: Chiller, Havner on IR
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:09 pm
PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:It's actually 13 guys on the IR, according to the Packers twitter account.
Thanks, fixed my post.
LOL @ anyone who loses to us.
Re: Chiller, Havner on IR
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:42 pm
Hopefully this clears some snaps for Wilhelm.
Re: Chiller, Havner on IR
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:43 pm
emunney wrote:Hopefully this clears some snaps for Wilhelm.
Not sure if serious.
Really, I'm not, is he supposed to be good or something?
Re: Chillar, Havner on IR
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 11:33 pm
Just want to see if he's got any more sweet game-losing facemasks up his sleeve.
Re: Chillar, Havner on IR
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 11:44 pm
emunney wrote:Just want to see if he's got any more sweet game-losing facemasks up his sleeve.
You mean potential game saving?
Re: Chiller, Havner on IR
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 11:58 pm
Wilford Brimley wrote:
LOL @ anyone who loses to us.
Are you trying to insinuate that the Packers aren't a good team?
Re: Chillar, Havner on IR
Posted: Wed Dec 1, 2010 12:45 am
chuckleslove wrote:emunney wrote:Just want to see if he's got any more sweet game-losing facemasks up his sleeve.
You mean potential game saving?
Unless it was his fault that he wasn't in a position to make a clean tackle, that should earn him kudos from the coaches.
Re: Chiller, Havner on IR
Posted: Wed Dec 1, 2010 12:48 am
LUKE23 wrote:The Chillar one hurts. He gave us a 3rd ILB and is the best on the team at covering TE's.
I've been hearing this since we signed Chillar, but then my eyes see him getting beat in coverage a lot.
Re: Chillar, Havner on IR
Posted: Wed Dec 1, 2010 1:00 am
Ayt wrote:chuckleslove wrote:emunney wrote:Just want to see if he's got any more sweet game-losing facemasks up his sleeve.
You mean potential game saving?
Unless it was his fault that he wasn't in a position to make a clean tackle, that should earn him kudos from the coaches.
Yep, he gave us at least a chance for our defense to stop them and force OT.
Re: Chillar, Havner on IR
Posted: Wed Dec 1, 2010 3:21 am
The LB core has held up very well so far but this one is going to hurt. We had Bishop ready to replace Barnett and there was a decent chance that Zombo would be an adequate replacement for B.Jones/Poppinga(the bar wasn't set very high). However, we do not have anyone waiting in the wings to replace Chillar.
Re: Chiller, Havner on IR
Posted: Wed Dec 1, 2010 4:19 am
El Duderino wrote:LUKE23 wrote:The Chillar one hurts. He gave us a 3rd ILB and is the best on the team at covering TE's.
I've been hearing this since we signed Chillar, but then my eyes see him getting beat in coverage a lot.
+1
Re: Chillar, Havner on IR
Posted: Wed Dec 1, 2010 5:47 am
Turk Nowitzki wrote:The LB core has held up very well so far but this one is going to hurt. We had Bishop ready to replace Barnett and there was a decent chance that Zombo would be an adequate replacement for B.Jones/Poppinga(the bar wasn't set very high). However, we do not have anyone waiting in the wings to replace Chillar.
Chillar is very replaceable as the third ILB so long as whoever takes his place knows the defense well enough.
For all the injuries the Packers have had, we are pretty healthy now and the only ones that really hurt are Finley, Grant, and Neal.
The rest of the guys on the IR were either marginal starters, marginal starters that were replaced by someone better like Barnett to Bishop and Burnett to Peprah, or spare parts type of players. Jenkins has his cast off and if Pickett can get over his ankle problems, we'll be as health as we can hope to be minus those three key guys in Finley, Grant, and Neal.
Re: Chillar, Havner on IR
Posted: Wed Dec 1, 2010 5:51 am
chuckleslove wrote:emunney wrote:Just want to see if he's got any more sweet game-losing facemasks up his sleeve.
You mean potential game saving?
In retrospect, the Packers would have been better off if Weems had returned that kick for a TD. At least then we'd have got the ball back with about 50 seconds left and a slim chance to drive for a tying TD.