ImageImage

PFF top 101 playmakers of 2010

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
chuckleslove
RealGM
Posts: 18,566
And1: 1,128
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Location: In an RV down by the river
Contact:
     

PFF top 101 playmakers of 2010 

Post#1 » by chuckleslove » Fri May 6, 2011 3:24 pm

For those not familiar with the website, they literally watch every snap of every game and grade out all 22 players on the field for every play of the season. Sometimes they get some controversial rankings(like they constantly talk about how overrated Pouncey was as a rookie) but they really do their homework and are always happy to back it up with stats and reasoning.

http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/20 ... he-top-20/

Packers on the list

#1 Rodgers
#48 Sitton
#51 Tramon
#56 Clay
#82 Bishop
#87 Jennings
#98 Jenkins
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: PFF top 101 playmakers of 2010 

Post#2 » by Newz » Fri May 6, 2011 3:27 pm

Pretty awesome we have seven guys on the list. I wonder where that ranks amongst teams? I have to assume it is first or very close to it.

I also think it shows just how important Sitton is to this team and how underrated he is even by our own fans. He is an absolutely monster at RG. I also think it shows just how good Desmond Bishop is... People don't really rank him up there with our 'star players', but that guy had a great year.

Sad to see Raji, Clifton, Collins and Woodson be left off. :(
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: PFF top 101 playmakers of 2010 

Post#3 » by Newz » Fri May 6, 2011 3:32 pm

48. Josh Sitton, RG, Green Bay Packers
We were suitably impressed with Sitton throughout the season that he was our consensus All Pro choice at right guard. He really didn’t have anything to prove. Then the playoffs came and he was superb throughout, with a +1.8 rating being his lowest. That series of performances allayed any fears I had over his run blocking, which was good but not great until then. He’s on another level than all other guards with his pass protection.
Best Performance: Week 4 versus Detroit (+5.5)
Key Stat: Gave up one sack all year. In the Super Bowl.


Image
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,154
And1: 15,031
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: PFF top 101 playmakers of 2010 

Post#4 » by Ayt » Fri May 6, 2011 7:16 pm

Now we just need to extend Mr. Sitton.
Greatness
RealGM
Posts: 12,636
And1: 4,556
Joined: Aug 23, 2009
Location: Toronto
     

Re: PFF top 101 playmakers of 2010 

Post#5 » by Greatness » Fri May 6, 2011 8:03 pm

Thought Clay would be higher
User avatar
Wise1
RealGM
Posts: 18,261
And1: 256
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Location: Devouring worlds.
     

Re: PFF top 101 playmakers of 2010 

Post#6 » by Wise1 » Sun May 8, 2011 4:29 pm

Top 100 = top 6% of the league so anyone on that list is pretty damn impressive.
User avatar
MartyConlonOnTheRun
RealGM
Posts: 27,480
And1: 13,298
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6

Re: PFF top 101 playmakers of 2010 

Post#7 » by MartyConlonOnTheRun » Mon May 9, 2011 3:51 am

Is this a point based ranking? From the descriptions of players, it seems to include playoffs. Are the Packers ranked high partly because they had 4 extra games over some players?
User avatar
Aaron It Out
General Manager
Posts: 8,804
And1: 3,101
Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Location: Black Mercedes
     

Re: PFF top 101 playmakers of 2010 

Post#8 » by Aaron It Out » Mon May 9, 2011 1:19 pm

OR maybe we are the Superbowl champions because we have so many playmakers 8-)
EastSideBucksFan wrote:At some point this board is going to have to drop their stupid bullsht agendas and just enjoy the team for once.
User avatar
chuckleslove
RealGM
Posts: 18,566
And1: 1,128
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Location: In an RV down by the river
Contact:
     

Re: PFF top 101 playmakers of 2010 

Post#9 » by chuckleslove » Mon May 9, 2011 3:40 pm

MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:Is this a point based ranking? From the descriptions of players, it seems to include playoffs. Are the Packers ranked high partly because they had 4 extra games over some players?


They grade every player at every position on their website, they have a membership based system and I won't pay for a membership but they watch every play on film multiple times on every single game and grade out every player. I'm sure they have some sort of grading system but I don't know what exactly it is.
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page

Return to Green Bay Packers