Page 1 of 22
Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:32 pm
by LUKE23
http://accuscore.com/football-betting-s ... ing-systemPlayoff projections nearly halfway through:
NFC:
1. Packers (13.5-2.5)
2. Saints (11.2-4.8)
3. Niners (10.8-5.2)
4. Cowboys (9.3-6.7)
5. Falcons (9.2-6.8)
6. Lions (9.1-6.9)
AFC:
1. Patriots (12.0-4.0)
2. Steelers (11.2-4.8)
3. Chargers (10.1-5.9)
4. Texans (9.6-6.4)
5. Ravens (10.3-5.7)
6. Bills (9.1-6.9)
Games of note this week:
Saints @ Rams - go Rams
Dolphins @ Giants - go Dolphins
Vikings @ Panthers -go Vikings
Redskins @ Bills - go Bills
Lions @ Broncos - go Broncos
Browns @ Niners - go Browns
Cowboys @ Eagles - don't care, I guess go Eagles
Some pretty bad matchups, lots of heavy favorites in the NFC games.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:40 pm
by LUKE23
Bernard Berrian released. They got good return on that investment.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 5:05 pm
by Marley2Hendrix
LUKE23 wrote:Bernard Berrian released. They got good return on that investment.
Yep, bernard DID NOT add to Minnesota's league leading number of players arrested during his time with the vikings. I think that is a net positive for that franchise (note - I didn't look it up to verify that Berrian did not get arrested, which may not have been a safe assumption on my part).
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 5:14 pm
by PkrsBcksGphsMqt
Letting Berrian go was one of, if not the smartest moves the Bears have made in the last 10 years.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 5:45 pm
by MickeyDavis
Crap games this week. Good time to take a Sunday NFL break and get ready for the rest of the season.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:24 pm
by SheedsWeed
Saw a segment on NFL Live with TO working out today. I wonder if any teams will sign him. They mentioned SF as a possible team, but idk if they want his distractions considering they started the season pretty decently.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 2:25 am
by BUCKnation
SheedsWeed wrote:Saw a segment on NFL Live with TO working out today. I wonder if any teams will sign him. They mentioned SF as a possible team, but idk if they want his distractions considering they started the season pretty decently.
he didnt cause any problems in buffalo, im surprised no one else is giving him a shot
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:26 am
by skitch815
LUKE23 wrote:Games of note this week:
Vikings @ Panthers -go Vikings
Why are we cheering for the Vikings here?
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:29 am
by ReasonablySober
skitch815 wrote:LUKE23 wrote:Games of note this week:
Vikings @ Panthers -go Vikings
Why are we cheering for the Vikings here?
The more wins they get the further they are away from an impact player. Luck, Blackmon, etc.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:35 am
by BUCKnation
DrugBust wrote:skitch815 wrote:LUKE23 wrote:Games of note this week:
Vikings @ Panthers -go Vikings
Why are we cheering for the Vikings here?
The more wins they get the further they are away from an impact player. Luck, Blackmon, etc.
makes sense, i was wondering the same thing at first
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 1:20 pm
by Newz
BUCKnation wrote:he didnt cause any problems in buffalo, im surprised no one else is giving him a shot
He's old, he wasn't very good last year, he is coming off of a major surgery and he is a serious risk in the locker room.
I'd be surprised if anyone did give him a shot.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 9:09 pm
by SheedsWeed
Newz wrote:BUCKnation wrote:he didnt cause any problems in buffalo, im surprised no one else is giving him a shot
He's old, he wasn't very good last year, he is coming off of a major surgery and he is a serious risk in the locker room.
I'd be surprised if anyone did give him a shot.
I don't know, the way Oakland evaluated Carson Palmer's worth, they might sign T.O. and officially "go all-in this year."
Wow, I still can't believe the draft picks they gave up for that guy. Unbelievable.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:31 pm
by LUKE23
Honestly, if I'm Chicago, I'm giving him a look.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:33 am
by skitch815
The surgery definitely is a huge flag but would you really say TO wasn't very good last year? 72 catches 983 yards and 9 TDs seems pretty good considering he was Cincy's #2 WR
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:13 am
by Ill-yasova
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:40 am
by BUCKnation
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:26 am
by Badgerlander
Carimi is back
Chris Harris confirmed he was released this morning. Was inactive in Week 6, started Week 7.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 7:50 pm
by Newz
THE PACKERS HAVE DONE IT!
WE ARE AT THE TOP OF THE REALGM POWER RANKINGS! SWEET FORMULA!!!!!11!
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:34 pm
by Kerb Hohl
I don't necessarily see what is so horrible about those formulas. They take a larger sample to straighten themselves out.
Re: Week 8: Non-Packers
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:50 pm
by Newz
GrendonJennings wrote:I don't necessarily see what is so horrible about those formulas. They take a larger sample to straighten themselves out.
So when is it going to straighten itself out? Almost 50% of the season is gone and it's supposed to be a week-by-week power ranking.
The formula still can't determine it's dumb to have the Saints as the 9th best team in the league?
I'd agree it wouldn't be horrible if it ever came even remotely close to projecting an accurate list.
