RealGM

Sorry boys, due to a laptop going crazy the original thread was deleted (I'm trying to get it back). Lots of good info in there about the cap, etc we'll have to try to recapture it.

Go home MD, you're drunk.

jakecronus8 wrote:Go home MD, you're drunk.

This post brought to you courtesy of happy hour at Art's.

Likely story, MD. Blame the laptop. Surrrrrrrrre.

I see in a couple mocks that Eric Fisher is falling to around 15-17. What would it take for us to move up ten spots in the draft to go and get him?

Revis Island?

Profound23 wrote:Revis Island?

No. Not that we could even afford it if we wanted to.

PkrsBcksGphsMqt wrote:

Profound23 wrote:Revis Island?

No. Not that we could even afford it if we wanted to.

It's not going to happen.......but I would do anything I could to get Revis, short of giving up Clay or Aaron. Even if it meant not having enough money for Raji's extension.

Woodson, Jennings, Finley gone and we would have enough money for Revis. Ted would never trade picks and Revis wouldn't want to come to GB more than likely anyways.

Revis is making close to $6 million, right? I think Tramon is making close to that if not more.

Last thing I said was Rodgers' extension should be around $8 mil/year more, Matthews ~$8-10 mil/year and Raji only about $2 mil/year.

I wish I was at Art's right now, brutal week

Newz wrote:I see in a couple mocks that Eric Fisher is falling to around 15-17. What would it take for us to move up ten spots in the draft to go and get him?

Our 1st, 2nd & 5th to go to #15

eagle13 wrote:

Newz wrote:I see in a couple mocks that Eric Fisher is falling to around 15-17. What would it take for us to move up ten spots in the draft to go and get him?

Our 1st, 2nd & 5th to go to #15

And that's completely ignoring that he's not gonna be there.

Bucksfans1and2 wrote:

eagle13 wrote:

Newz wrote:I see in a couple mocks that Eric Fisher is falling to around 15-17. What would it take for us to move up ten spots in the draft to go and get him?

Our 1st, 2nd & 5th to go to #15

And that's completely ignoring that he's not gonna be there.

Yeah. I can't see both the Cards and Chargers passing on him.

Bucksfans1and2 wrote:

eagle13 wrote:

Newz wrote:I see in a couple mocks that Eric Fisher is falling to around 15-17. What would it take for us to move up ten spots in the draft to go and get him?

Our 1st, 2nd & 5th to go to #15

And that's completely ignoring that he's not gonna be there.

I was shocked to see him fall that far in the few mocks that I saw him drop. But I would be willing to give up our 1st, 2nd and 5th to get him if that's what it took.

MickeyDavis wrote:I wish I was at Art's right now, brutal week

I was actually there, for the first time, after the Bucks game on Tuesday. Words cannot express...

Apparently our roster moves got lost... So here is my updated version

DRAFT
1 DL
2 OLB
3 WR
4 CB
4 ILB
5 RB
6 FB
7 C/G

GONE
DB Woodson
LB Hawk Walden Zombo Lattimore
WR Jennings Driver
RB Starks Kuhn Benson Grant
TE Williams
OL Saturday

PUP
Sherrod OL - got a bad feeling - maybe mid season
Worthy DL

ROSTER - 53
OFFENSE - 24
QB Rodgers / Harrell
RB Rogers / Green / 5th
FB 6th
WR Cobb / 3rd / Boykin
WR Nelson / Jones / Ross
TE Finley / Quarless / Crabtree / Taylor
LT Bulaga / Datko
LG Lang / (VanRoten)
C EDS / VanRoten /
RG Sitton / (Barclay)
RT Barclay / Newhouse

DEFENSE – 26
LDE Raji / Neal
NT Pickett (Raji)
RDE Wilson / 1st / Daniels
LOLB Perry / 2nd
WILB Bishop / Jones / Manning
SILB Smith / Francois / 4th
ROLB Matthews / Moses
LCB Williams / Hayward / 4th
RCB Shields / House / Bush
SS Burnett / Richardson
FS McMilian / Jennings

DEFENSIVE SUB-PACKAGES
NB Hayward
DM Jennings
DT 1st / Daniels
DT Raji / Neal

SPECIAL TEAMS - 3
K Crosby
P Masthay
LS Goode
KR Ross
PR Ross

PRACTICE SQUAD - 7
Campbell QB
7th C/G
Miller NT
+4

I strongly disagree with these rankings of QBs under 30.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100000 ... s-under-30

Yea, Rodgers is way too high.

Matt Flynn, 27, Seattle Seahawks: We haven't seen much of him, but the fact that the Seahawks do a very good job evaluating players leads you to think he likely has some serious potential.

Why are the Seahawks given the credit for evaluating the talent? I question the writer(s) when they say something like that.