Packers/Vikes Postgame
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Packers/Vikes Postgame
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,763
- And1: 6,963
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Packers/Vikes Postgame
I think this is an underrated win. Really impressed with our balance right now. Rodgers is locked in. Next week is big.
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
- Aaron It Out
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,804
- And1: 3,101
- Joined: Jun 27, 2008
- Location: Black Mercedes
-
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
They looked really good tonight. and I feel that's a bit of an understatement. I don't want to get extremely carried away, though. Afterall, it was the Vikings.
EastSideBucksFan wrote:At some point this board is going to have to drop their stupid bullsht agendas and just enjoy the team for once.
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,787
- And1: 27,356
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame

stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
- Matches Malone
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,227
- And1: 26,567
- Joined: Nov 23, 2005
-
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
Great win. I can't wait to get Casey Hayward back. Tramon has looked like poop. Hyde stepping up and showing his return abilities. Love what the running game has been. If we can keep James Starks healthy the rest of the way, we are looking at a very dangerous two-headed monster. Add the fact that James Jones should be coming back and we are looking nice for all the injuries we have had to endure.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,692
- And1: 3,187
- Joined: May 29, 2009
- Location: MKE
-
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
I agree with the theme of balance, Luke. How complete of a team we are becoming is what stands out most to me. The last few years we've relied heavily on an elite air threat to be successful. We still have the same pass thrower, very good pass catching options(more so once Cobb and Jones are back), a couple good to very good runners, good blocking, a good secondary, a good front 7 - maybe great once Perry and Matthews return, and a returner in Hyde who I'd be fine if he just caught the ball, but even showed he can break one tonight. Sorry for the long winded sentence, but I'm pretty excited about this team.
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,274
- And1: 501
- Joined: Feb 07, 2012
-
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
Next up at QB for the Vikes...


Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
- rilamann
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,700
- And1: 15,232
- Joined: Jun 20, 2003
- Location: Damn that rilamann!!
-
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
It's looking like I might have to make reservations at the crow buffet....fine with me.This team is looking pretty damn good.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,600
- And1: 4,251
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
This game was a lot closer than it actually was. It was a fun game.
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,426
- And1: 1,248
- Joined: Sep 09, 2013
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
Don't turn the ball over next week and I feel the Bears D can be shredded much like the Vikes D was tonight. Their D has really fallen off this year. Injuries and age finally catching up to them. I suppose if this was in Chicago I MIGHT be a little nervous, but Monday night in GB? I think we blow them out.
As for tonight, Rodgers was locked in, running game continued to look great and the D continued to play as well as they have since roughly week 2.
As for tonight, Rodgers was locked in, running game continued to look great and the D continued to play as well as they have since roughly week 2.
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,763
- And1: 6,963
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
I think we are the best team in the NFC if we get healthy. Wouldn't have said that without the OL run blocking like they are. That's a dimension we haven't had in a long **** time.
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,426
- And1: 1,248
- Joined: Sep 09, 2013
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
Kevin Seifert @SeifertESPN
Greg Jennings was gone from the #Vikings locker room by the time reporters were let in.
Wow. Wouldn't surprise me if he was begging to come back in that post game conversation with Rodgers.
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,787
- And1: 27,356
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
Best response to that tweet was #BeGone
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,390
- And1: 8,012
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
40 minutes to 20 minutes in time of possession. Running games are good.
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,787
- And1: 27,356
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
So are **** offenses that you can get off the field in 3 plays.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 5,142
- And1: 163
- Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
rilamann wrote:It's looking like I might have to make reservations at the crow buffet....fine with me.This team is looking pretty damn good.
All of us already made the reservation for u. This is a just about a yearly event for u and we figured the least we could do this year is save u a little trouble...


Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 5,142
- And1: 163
- Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,545
- And1: 1,328
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: Working on pad level
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
Aaron It Out wrote:They looked really good tonight. and I feel that's a bit of an understatement. I don't want to get extremely carried away, though. Afterall, it was the Vikings.
Everyone from Ted to the whole coaching staff deserves a ton of credit for the team still managing to play well even though so many starters and many key starters have been out injured.
One thing which rarely gets talked about is the continuity of the coaching staff. We've lost very few assistant coaches over the last 4-5 years and between them and McCarthy i think that's helped the team stay the course even as injuries seem to ravage the Packers more than most teams.
Obviously having Rodgers helps a ton, but this whole organization is just so stable from top to bottom. The coaching staff buys in completely to Ted's vision for building a team and there really have been very few players over the years who seem to have a strong me first agenda over team first.
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
- Buck You
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 37,555
- And1: 541
- Joined: Jul 24, 2006
- Location: Illinois
-
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
- SpReEfOrAlL
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,330
- And1: 161
- Joined: Jul 29, 2002
- Location: July 2010!
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
- Ill-yasova
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,364
- And1: 2,562
- Joined: Jul 13, 2006
Re: Packers/Vikes Postgame
Buck You wrote:
Yep. Wife was burning a hole through me during that part of the game. I greatly appreciate the GIF.