ATL: Week 16
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
ATL: Week 16
- FAH1223
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,287
- And1: 7,382
- Joined: Nov 01, 2005
- Location: Laurel, MD
-
ATL: Week 16
Demarco Murray looks to play with a broken hand.
RGIII is back as the Redskins starter. Would be nice for him to go back to 201 and beat the Eagles. So the Packers can clinch.
RGIII is back as the Redskins starter. Would be nice for him to go back to 201 and beat the Eagles. So the Packers can clinch.

Re: ATL: Week 16
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,767
- And1: 27,344
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: ATL: Week 16
[tweet]https://twitter.com/NOTSportsCenter/status/545364302882799616[/tweet]
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: ATL: Week 16
- Asher
- Starter
- Posts: 2,034
- And1: 159
- Joined: Jul 05, 2006
Re: ATL: Week 16
Yup.
http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/3608/jay-cutler
wonder if this is trestman trying to take emery out with him, or a combo decision. either way, it's ugly in chicago.
http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/3608/jay-cutler
wonder if this is trestman trying to take emery out with him, or a combo decision. either way, it's ugly in chicago.
Re: ATL: Week 16
- MartyConlonOnTheRun
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,471
- And1: 13,291
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6
Re: ATL: Week 16
I hate this. I loved watching cutler failing.
Also he was chicagos main hope for beating the lions.
Also he was chicagos main hope for beating the lions.
Re: ATL: Week 16
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,767
- And1: 27,344
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: ATL: Week 16
Yeah. Clausen isn't beating the Lions. Chances are Cutler wasn't either but Cutler has a better chance of beating the Lions than Clausen does.
Either way, LOL Cutler, LOL Bears.
Either way, LOL Cutler, LOL Bears.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: ATL: Week 16
-
- Senior
- Posts: 731
- And1: 171
- Joined: Dec 26, 2012
Re: ATL: Week 16
i had no idea cutler was the highest paid offensive player in the league either. i would imagine he will be cut this offseason right? don't think anybody would trade for him given him contract
Re: ATL: Week 16
- MartyConlonOnTheRun
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,471
- And1: 13,291
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6
Re: ATL: Week 16
packfan414 wrote:i had no idea cutler was the highest paid offensive player in the league either. i would imagine he will be cut this offseason right? don't think anybody would trade for him given him contract
I could be wrong but Cutler has a weird contract where it would kill their cap if they cut him and that it is very unlikely.
Re: ATL: Week 16
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,528
- And1: 10,868
- Joined: Jan 14, 2014
- Location: Hong Kong
-
Re: ATL: Week 16
MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:packfan414 wrote:i had no idea cutler was the highest paid offensive player in the league either. i would imagine he will be cut this offseason right? don't think anybody would trade for him given him contract
I could be wrong but Cutler has a weird contract where it would kill their cap if they cut him and that it is very unlikely.
They can't cut him next year, I think it's an insane cap hit. I think possibly the following year but it's still a big cap hit. I looked it up a couple months ago but forgot now.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Re: ATL: Week 16
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,406
- And1: 343
- Joined: Dec 23, 2004
- Location: Rockford, IL
-
Re: ATL: Week 16
MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:packfan414 wrote:i had no idea cutler was the highest paid offensive player in the league either. i would imagine he will be cut this offseason right? don't think anybody would trade for him given him contract
I could be wrong but Cutler has a weird contract where it would kill their cap if they cut him and that it is very unlikely.
It's close to a $20 million cap hit. His contract is guaranteed for the next two years. Their best bet is to find a team that is extremely starved for a QB to see if they'll take on that contract. Teams like Buffalo, the Jets, and St. Louis would make a lot of sense in that regard.
It is pretty funny to still see some Bears fans defending Cutler. That contract was a bad one when they initially re-signed him; now it just looks horrific.
Re: ATL: Week 16
- MartyConlonOnTheRun
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,471
- And1: 13,291
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6
Re: ATL: Week 16
Flames24Rulz wrote:MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:packfan414 wrote:i had no idea cutler was the highest paid offensive player in the league either. i would imagine he will be cut this offseason right? don't think anybody would trade for him given him contract
I could be wrong but Cutler has a weird contract where it would kill their cap if they cut him and that it is very unlikely.
It's close to a $20 million cap hit. His contract is guaranteed for the next two years. Their best bet is to find a team that is extremely starved for a QB to see if they'll take on that contract. Teams like Buffalo, the Jets, and St. Louis would make a lot of sense in that regard.
It is pretty funny to still see some Bears fans defending Cutler. That contract was a bad one when they initially re-signed him; now it just looks horrific.
Isn't it something were it is almost a rolling two year guarantee so even next year they would owe two years? Honestly, I didn't think the deal was horrible at the time if you ignored the mental issues, which have gotten worse. At the time, it looked like he could mature and was good enough to take his team deep in the playoffs. As a percentage of the cap, it is worth it to overpay a QB since there impact is so big. I just think the structure of the contract screwed them over since they are stuck and everyone knows it.
Re: ATL: Week 16
-
- Senior
- Posts: 731
- And1: 171
- Joined: Dec 26, 2012
Re: ATL: Week 16
wow that's crazy. i still think cutler could possibly be successful if they brought in a coach that could control him like holmgren and favre. and then designed their offense through forte
Re: ATL: Week 16
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,940
- And1: 11,127
- Joined: Nov 01, 2012
Re: ATL: Week 16
Flames24Rulz wrote:
It is pretty funny to still see some Bears fans defending Cutler. That contract was a bad one when they initially re-signed him; now it just looks horrific.
The idiocy was in signing him to the deal in the first place. It ain't Jay's fault the Bears are idiots. Jay's just put up basically the exact same numbers percentage wise, he has over the past 3 years. He's just 1) been healthy, and 2) thrown the ball more.
Amos Barshad: "So you got a job, a place to live, a license? What’s left?"
Giannis: “Nothing. Just get a ring now.”
Giannis: “Nothing. Just get a ring now.”
Re: ATL: Week 16
- Ron Swanson
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,641
- And1: 29,466
- Joined: May 15, 2013
Re: ATL: Week 16
KJ Wright and Avril both signing $28 million extensions. They already signed Sherman and Thomas to monster deals, and they still have to set aside enough for Russell's inevitable massive contract. Where the hell is Seattle finding all this money to spend?
Re: ATL: Week 16
-
- Senior
- Posts: 583
- And1: 263
- Joined: Jul 10, 2012
-
Re: ATL: Week 16
Ron Swanson wrote:KJ Wright and Avril both signing $28 million extensions. They already signed Sherman and Thomas to monster deals, and they still have to set aside enough for Russell's inevitable massive contract. Where the hell is Seattle finding all this money to spend?
Harvin being gone already (who I figured would have been cut by 2016 anyways) helps, even though we'll still have a lot of dead money in him next year. Mebane (who's on IR) will very likely be cut and Okung should be but I don't have a lot of hope we'll do it. I actually thought Avril would get 9 mill per year on the open market so I'm surprised at what we got him at. Wright got what I thought he would but I thought we would have to choose between him and Wagner.
Re: ATL: Week 16
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 103,121
- And1: 55,663
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
Re: ATL: Week 16
Looks like Da Bears will have to send a decent pick along with Cutler in order for a team to take him off their hands.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Re: ATL: Week 16
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,726
- And1: 8,135
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
-
Re: ATL: Week 16
Can someone refresh my memory? Do we want Philly to win or lose today?
Do it for Chuck
Re: ATL: Week 16
- chuckleslove
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,566
- And1: 1,128
- Joined: Nov 17, 2009
- Location: In an RV down by the river
- Contact:
-
Re: ATL: Week 16
jakecronus8 wrote:Can someone refresh my memory? Do we want Philly to win or lose today?
lose
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
Re: ATL: Week 16
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,726
- And1: 8,135
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
-
Re: ATL: Week 16
chuckleslove wrote:jakecronus8 wrote:Can someone refresh my memory? Do we want Philly to win or lose today?
lose
And of course they piss and sh*t the bed.
Do it for Chuck
Re: ATL: Week 16
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,426
- And1: 1,248
- Joined: Sep 09, 2013
Re: ATL: Week 16
This Philly game is going the way we want it to so far. They lose, we win tomorrow and at least clinch a playoff spot. Still want the division next week though.