ImageImage

Postgame: Rams at Packers

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,767
And1: 27,344
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#1 » by trwi7 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:20 pm

Defense won this game. Offense has a ton to work on.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,389
And1: 8,012
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#2 » by Mags FTW » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:22 pm

Offense needs to settle down. I think they fell in love with with drawing teams offside and catching them with 12 on the field. Get back to basics please.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,455
And1: 11,474
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#3 » by Turk Nowitzki » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:23 pm

Ugly win, good news that is that pretty much everyone in the league is playing ugly football right now.
User avatar
MartyConlonOnTheRun
RealGM
Posts: 27,471
And1: 13,291
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#4 » by MartyConlonOnTheRun » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:28 pm

Rodger and Lacy had their worst games in a few years and we still won by 2 TDs. I'm taking that as a good sign. Rodgers won't through 2 INTs for at least another 6 games
ACGB
RealGM
Posts: 10,714
And1: 2,813
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Location: 414
 

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#5 » by ACGB » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:36 pm

Seems like the injuries are catching up to the offense. Almost all key players are either missing or banged up.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,149
And1: 15,027
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#6 » by Ayt » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:37 pm

Mags FTW wrote:Offense needs to settle down. I think they fell in love with with drawing teams offside and catching them with 12 on the field. Get back to basics please.


We just lack players at WR and TE right now. Hopefully we get Adams back soon. We need a guy like him on the outside who can actually make some plays down the field.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,287
And1: 7,382
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#7 » by FAH1223 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:40 pm

ACGB wrote:Seems like the injuries are catching up to the offense. Almost all key players are either missing or banged up.


Bulaga played pretty good in his return, thought he would need another couple weeks

Lang's injury is the most concerning.

And our WR situation would be so bad if #89 wasn't there. Man. It's also telling that the coaches have no confidence in either #83 or #84 on offense. We could use one of them.
Image
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,977
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#8 » by WiscoKing13 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:43 pm

I forgot who tweeted it, but without Jordy the pack need to look at the Pats play calling. They've been working without a deep threat since moss left and their offense never looked like this.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,977
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#9 » by WiscoKing13 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:45 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
Lang's injury is the most concerning.


It sucks and we'd much rather have Lang but this roster has plenty of quality options at OG compared to what have at OT.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,977
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#10 » by WiscoKing13 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:47 pm

Also how about not going for it on 4th and 1? By some miracle they don't block the kick and then get a 60 yard pass play that we save with a shoe string tackle. Why not just go for it and if we miss they still have to get 11 points.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
User avatar
LikeABosh
RealGM
Posts: 19,124
And1: 8,855
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
     

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#11 » by LikeABosh » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:50 pm

Loved the defense in this game. Foles only had like 60 yards passing or something? Awesome
User avatar
MartyConlonOnTheRun
RealGM
Posts: 27,471
And1: 13,291
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#12 » by MartyConlonOnTheRun » Sun Oct 11, 2015 9:03 pm

WiscoKing13 wrote:Also how about not going for it on 4th and 1? By some miracle they don't block the kick and then get a 60 yard pass play that we save with a shoe string tackle. Why not just go for it and if we miss they still have to get 11 points.

Versus not making it and the Rams throwing a 60 yard pass play that we save with a shoe string tackle and only being up by a FG?
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,977
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#13 » by WiscoKing13 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 9:03 pm

Interested to hear if the NFL says anything about the INT that was clearly trapped and wasn't reviewed. That was a bunch of ****.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,977
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#14 » by WiscoKing13 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 9:04 pm

MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:
WiscoKing13 wrote:Also how about not going for it on 4th and 1? By some miracle they don't block the kick and then get a 60 yard pass play that we save with a shoe string tackle. Why not just go for it and if we miss they still have to get 11 points.

Versus not making it and the Rams throwing a 60 yard pass play that we save with a shoe string tackle and only being up by a FG?

More things can go wrong on a FG kick that nets you almost nothing versus a 4th and 1.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,909
And1: 16,587
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#15 » by humanrefutation » Sun Oct 11, 2015 9:16 pm

Pass rush was outstanding today. Really forced the Foles to make some rushed throws and picks.

The offense is struggling, clearly. Guys just are not getting separation even with Rodgers having time in the pocket. I imagine that losing Lang for a significant period of time will hamper our running game as well.

Hopefully, getting Adams back will make a difference there, but we're really really missing Jordy.
User avatar
DH34Phan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,627
And1: 114
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Contact:

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#16 » by DH34Phan » Sun Oct 11, 2015 9:30 pm

Nice to see the young guys in the secondary have great games. Clinton-Dix, Rollins, and Randall are looking very good.
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,977
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#17 » by WiscoKing13 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 9:40 pm

Looking at the rest of the schedule, how the hell did we get 4 west cost trips in one year? Hate how the year ends we go to OAK and then have to go to AZ. That AZ game could be huge.

Also 4 straight division games after CAR, there has to be a let down in one of those.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
User avatar
thomchatt3rton
Head Coach
Posts: 6,405
And1: 2,236
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#18 » by thomchatt3rton » Sun Oct 11, 2015 9:44 pm

WiscoKing13 wrote:I forgot who tweeted it, but without Jordy the pack need to look at the Pats play calling. They've been working without a deep threat since moss left and their offense never looked like this.


Totally agree. Tho Pats do have gronk, which really helps open things up for the edelmans of the world. But yeah.
I thought the KC game was the dawning of a new era in tailor-made offensive game-planning w all the short, quick passes but I guess it was just crappy CB by the chiefs.
Injuries obviously really affecting what GB wants to do tho, and Clements etc havent caught up to gameplanning for a vastly depleted, 1TE-havin' receiving corps.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 20,546
And1: 8,292
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#19 » by Profound23 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 11:34 pm

Unbelievable day:

Driving up to Packer game, car died, need new transmission. Missed the game. Get home, get blown out in fantasy football and lose Jamaal Charles for the year. UGH!

For years I have been trying to acquire Jamaal Charles and see a Packer regular season game. What terrible luck.
User avatar
DigitalFool
Veteran
Posts: 2,576
And1: 152
Joined: Jul 13, 2006

Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers 

Post#20 » by DigitalFool » Sun Oct 11, 2015 11:52 pm

My wife is very casual Packer fan and I went I let out a groan with the first INT, she said what happened? I said Favre just threw an interception. She's like Favre? Oops...yeah spoiled with Rodgers at QB.

That said, the silver lining is we don't have to hear about the home streak anymore. It was getting obnoxious.

Return to Green Bay Packers