Packers @ Raiders
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Packers @ Raiders
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Packers @ Raiders
Tom Silverstein @TomSilverstein 2m2 minutes ago
#Packers inactives:
QB Brett Hundley
CB Sam Shields
RB John Crockett
LB Andy Mulumba
G Josh Walker
TE Kennard Backman
WR Ty Montgomery
Better have a really short leash on Linsley.
#Packers inactives:
QB Brett Hundley
CB Sam Shields
RB John Crockett
LB Andy Mulumba
G Josh Walker
TE Kennard Backman
WR Ty Montgomery
Better have a really short leash on Linsley.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Packers @ Raiders
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Packers @ Raiders
Tom Silverstein @TomSilverstein 23s24 seconds ago
#Raiders inactives:
S Nate Allen
RB Roy Helu
CB Neiko Thorpe
OL Matt McCants
WR Rod Streater
TE Gabe Holmes
DT Leon Orr
#Packers
#Raiders inactives:
S Nate Allen
RB Roy Helu
CB Neiko Thorpe
OL Matt McCants
WR Rod Streater
TE Gabe Holmes
DT Leon Orr
#Packers
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Packers @ Raiders
- BigDee
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,175
- And1: 1,381
- Joined: Jul 11, 2006
- Location: Wisconsin
-
Re: Packers @ Raiders
No surprises on the inactive list.
Re: Packers @ Raiders
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Packers @ Raiders
Rob Demovsky @RobDemovsky 20s20 seconds ago
JC Tretter, not Linsley, gets the start at center.
JC Tretter, not Linsley, gets the start at center.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Packers @ Raiders
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Packers @ Raiders
They really need to give Janis better defined rules for bringing the ball out. He doesn't appear to get it.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Packers @ Raiders
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Packers @ Raiders
Great 3 and out.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Packers @ Raiders
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,361
- And1: 4,166
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Packers @ Raiders
Whoa a good punt. Buying a lotto ticket.
Re: Packers @ Raiders
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Packers @ Raiders
I remember when we could spread a team 5 wide.....
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Packers @ Raiders
- thomchatt3rton
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,405
- And1: 2,236
- Joined: Jun 11, 2009
-
Re: Packers @ Raiders
Theyre really out-schemin' us with these slightly tricky runs.
Thank goodness carr didnt see clay on that wr and change the play...
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Thank goodness carr didnt see clay on that wr and change the play...
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Packers @ Raiders
- thomchatt3rton
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,405
- And1: 2,236
- Joined: Jun 11, 2009
-
Packers @ Raiders
Btw, I predict CW is a non-factor today 
Sent from the future of this game

Sent from the future of this game
Re: Packers @ Raiders
- BigDee
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,175
- And1: 1,381
- Joined: Jul 11, 2006
- Location: Wisconsin
-
Re: Packers @ Raiders
Let's go O!
Re: Packers @ Raiders
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Packers @ Raiders
back shoulder apparently a joke.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Packers @ Raiders
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,684
- And1: 27,268
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Packers @ Raiders
Offense is **** again.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Packers @ Raiders
- thomchatt3rton
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,405
- And1: 2,236
- Joined: Jun 11, 2009
-
Re: Packers @ Raiders
But the punt-coverage unit looks great
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Packers @ Raiders
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Packers @ Raiders
Holly **** great play by hyde and dumbass **** by the defense for celebrating.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Packers @ Raiders
- crkone
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,101
- And1: 9,743
- Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Re: Packers @ Raiders
Lol Packers.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
Re: Packers @ Raiders
- Dwade03
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,984
- And1: 200
- Joined: Jul 05, 2005
- Location: Oconomowoc
-
Re: Packers @ Raiders
Hyde yess
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Fire Hammond
TKF wrote:Lue is a jackass
Re: Packers @ Raiders
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,684
- And1: 27,268
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Packers @ Raiders
Hyde actually kept up with a receiver!
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Packers @ Raiders
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Packers @ Raiders
Why is haha **** hyde and the rest of the team holding hyde up?
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Packers @ Raiders
- Dwade03
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,984
- And1: 200
- Joined: Jul 05, 2005
- Location: Oconomowoc
-
Re: Packers @ Raiders
**** morons
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Fire Hammond
TKF wrote:Lue is a jackass