Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 106,815
- And1: 41,382
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
I came into this thing without a favorite, but in the last week I've decided I want the Broncos to absolutely bludgeon the Panthers. No one seems to be giving them much of a chance and I like dogs. Send the old man out with another Super Bowl.
Pretty basic menu. Old fashioneds, bloodies, screwdrivers, nachos, guac, pizza.
Pretty basic menu. Old fashioneds, bloodies, screwdrivers, nachos, guac, pizza.
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,870
- And1: 4,929
- Joined: May 06, 2014
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
No favorite here in this game also but on the other side of the coin this is a rare SB where there's not a team I dislike and truly want to see lose so a good game is what I want to see.
That said I'm pulling for the Broncos for pretty much the same reasons as RS. Pull for the underdog and it would be a nice story to send Peyton out with a ring
That said I'm pulling for the Broncos for pretty much the same reasons as RS. Pull for the underdog and it would be a nice story to send Peyton out with a ring
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
- chuckleslove
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,566
- And1: 1,128
- Joined: Nov 17, 2009
- Location: In an RV down by the river
- Contact:
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
I have a cousin who married a really annoying Broncos fan who seems to think every team in the league has a ton of bandwagon fans other than the Broncos, so for that reason, go Panthers.
Broncos fans have at least as many bandwagon fans as any other team due to Manning alone.
Broncos fans have at least as many bandwagon fans as any other team due to Manning alone.
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,684
- And1: 27,268
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
Having Peyton Manning's only Super Bowl win be against the Bears would be pretty sweet.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
- PkrsBcksGphsMqt
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,827
- And1: 1,417
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Madison
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
Not only do I not hate either team, I kind of like them. I'd probably lean Panthers because Cam is on my keeper team. Would love to see Peyton get another though so Eli doesn't end up with more.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,975
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
Don't care of either way really.
2 great defenses going head to head which should be fun to watch. It will all come down to the QB's, Cam vs Manning. Whoever has a better game will more than likely win.
2 great defenses going head to head which should be fun to watch. It will all come down to the QB's, Cam vs Manning. Whoever has a better game will more than likely win.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,975
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
Last minute change of heart, i'm pulling for the broncos because of manning. Won' be devastated if they don't win but it would be great way for him to go out after the ups and downs of this year.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,975
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
That was one of the best national anthems i've ever heard.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
- dedned
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,726
- And1: 1,465
- Joined: Feb 02, 2005
- Location: nowhere
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
WiscoKing13 wrote:That was one of the best national anthems i've ever heard.
The broadcast I'm watching had no audio until the end.

Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
- chuckleslove
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,566
- And1: 1,128
- Joined: Nov 17, 2009
- Location: In an RV down by the river
- Contact:
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
WiscoKing13 wrote:That was one of the best national anthems i've ever heard.
Other than the mullet I agree.
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
- MikeIsGood
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,567
- And1: 11,502
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: Vamos Rafa
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
chuckleslove wrote:WiscoKing13 wrote:That was one of the best national anthems i've ever heard.
Other than the mullet I agree.
Yeah she kinda nailed it. A little too much 'Christina vibrato' for me at times, but hard to argue otherwise.
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,684
- And1: 27,268
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
That was a pretty bad spot.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
- crkone
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,100
- And1: 9,742
- Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
It was okay. She sounded like Cher a few times, lol.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,684
- And1: 27,268
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
That's a catch.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
- BigDee
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,175
- And1: 1,381
- Joined: Jul 11, 2006
- Location: Wisconsin
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
I don't know about that.
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
- Siefer
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,056
- And1: 6,704
- Joined: Nov 05, 2006
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
What a terrible review decision.
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
- BigDee
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,175
- And1: 1,381
- Joined: Jul 11, 2006
- Location: Wisconsin
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
Wow hell of play by Miller.
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,975
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
trwi7 wrote:That's a catch.
I think the it's the correct call. When the ball is wedged between his hand and body and goes towards his knee there's a part of the ball you can't see if it's above the ground. IMO good call.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,975
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
Huge drive on how Cam comes back from this, if he's rattled this could be a long day.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
- dedned
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,726
- And1: 1,465
- Joined: Feb 02, 2005
- Location: nowhere
-
Re: Super Bowl 50 - Game Thread
Siefer wrote:What a terrible review decision.
Seems pretty huge now. Could decide the game.
