ImageImage

ATL: Week 9

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,286
And1: 7,381
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

ATL: Week 9 

Post#1 » by FAH1223 » Wed Nov 2, 2016 12:05 pm

Trent Williams suspended 4 games for missing a drug test

Should help the Pack on 11/20, a game I'll be going to
Image
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,486
And1: 4,427
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#2 » by Kerb Hohl » Wed Nov 2, 2016 2:45 pm

Norv Turner canned. Errr, he is "resigning."
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,502
And1: 29,308
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#3 » by Ron Swanson » Wed Nov 2, 2016 4:31 pm

So what are the chances at this point of the Vikings pulling a last year's Falcons and completely missing the playoffs after a 5-0 start? Predictably, their dominant defense could only cover up for their horrid offense for so long.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,486
And1: 4,427
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#4 » by Kerb Hohl » Wed Nov 2, 2016 5:05 pm

I'm glad to be wrong about them so far. This game is huge if you want them to be the Falcons of last year. As much as they've sucked, their homefield advantage is still huge. If they're 5-3 looking at some challenging games coming up, then they could miss the playoffs. I still think they can squeak at least four home games and an away game or two if their defense shows up.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,502
And1: 29,308
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#5 » by Ron Swanson » Wed Nov 2, 2016 5:37 pm

Kerb Hohl wrote:I'm glad to be wrong about them so far. This game is huge if you want them to be the Falcons of last year. As much as they've sucked, their homefield advantage is still huge. If they're 5-3 looking at some challenging games coming up, then they could miss the playoffs. I still think they can squeak at least four home games and an away game or two if their defense shows up.


I'm looking at their schedule and yeah, they're bound to scrape by and get a couple home wins, but the Lions are no joke and Stafford has looked like a borderline MVP candidate. @Jacksonville is really the only road game where I feel that they should definitely win, but they can pretty much lose any game if they couldn't move the ball against an awful Bears defense.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,741
And1: 54,910
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#6 » by MickeyDavis » Wed Nov 2, 2016 6:26 pm

Love seeing the Queens in panic mode.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,284
And1: 7,931
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#7 » by Mags FTW » Thu Nov 3, 2016 12:07 am

Conspiracy Theory being floated on Reddit:

Shurmur was actually the one designing and calling plays the first 4 games with Bradford due to his familiarity coaching him. Norv got his duties back over the bye week and produced two extremely lack luster games back at the helm designing and calling plays. Spielman and management tell Norv they want Shurmur calling plays and Norv resigns.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,486
And1: 4,427
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#8 » by Kerb Hohl » Thu Nov 3, 2016 4:41 pm

Mags FTW wrote:Conspiracy Theory being floated on Reddit:

Shurmur was actually the one designing and calling plays the first 4 games with Bradford due to his familiarity coaching him. Norv got his duties back over the bye week and produced two extremely lack luster games back at the helm designing and calling plays. Spielman and management tell Norv they want Shurmur calling plays and Norv resigns.


Maybe...but those would be some magical plays. Teams are just covering all of the mid-range routes and stopping the Asiata/McKinnon train with their front 6 as well as getting pressure on Bradford with their front 4. Teams are starting to figure them out.
Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 20,361
And1: 8,168
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#9 » by Profound23 » Fri Nov 4, 2016 2:53 am

Watching Tampa rush snaps at the end of the 1st and 3rd quarter....dumb with ATLs defense killing their line why allow them to time the snap?
raysbookclub
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,756
And1: 1,258
Joined: Jan 26, 2008
     

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#10 » by raysbookclub » Sat Nov 5, 2016 2:39 pm

Will be interesting to see the Vikings against the Lions this week and then @WAS. Can their offense turn it around? Were their defensive probs vs the Bears a fluke? But the Lions are tough to figure, too; they win 3 straight against good teams (PHI, LA, WAS) and then lose to HOU.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,284
And1: 7,931
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#11 » by Mags FTW » Sat Nov 5, 2016 5:15 pm

books wrote:Will be interesting to see the Vikings against the Lions this week and then @WAS. Can their offense turn it around? Were their defensive probs vs the Bears a fluke? But the Lions are tough to figure, too; they win 3 straight against good teams (PHI, LA, WAS) and then lose to HOU.

For the Vikings, it's all their offensive line. The rumor on Norv being fired is that he wasn't calling enough quick hitters that negate their line sucking.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,284
And1: 7,931
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#12 » by Mags FTW » Sun Nov 6, 2016 6:13 pm

Why did the Steelers just run it on 3rd and 9?
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,741
And1: 54,910
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#13 » by MickeyDavis » Sun Nov 6, 2016 7:12 pm

Yup Norv was the problem with the Queens offense
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
thomchatt3rton
Head Coach
Posts: 6,405
And1: 2,236
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#14 » by thomchatt3rton » Sun Nov 6, 2016 7:36 pm

Dallas is really the perfect situation for a rookie starting QB to be successful (and they've done a good job making themselves into that perfect situation too).

Not to take away from Dak, but Dallas has a great O-line, a good running game, and a passing offense that not only doesn't ask him to do too much but also seems tailored to fit his strengths.

This could be the rare case where a rookie QB doesn't really hit a wall and start playing like crap in a major way. (at least during the regular season).
User avatar
BigDee
RealGM
Posts: 16,175
And1: 1,381
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
Location: Wisconsin
     

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#15 » by BigDee » Sun Nov 6, 2016 7:37 pm

Giants decided to show up today.
User avatar
BigDee
RealGM
Posts: 16,175
And1: 1,381
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
Location: Wisconsin
     

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#16 » by BigDee » Sun Nov 6, 2016 7:54 pm

LOl at Vikings Walsh.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,741
And1: 54,910
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#17 » by MickeyDavis » Sun Nov 6, 2016 8:28 pm

Hang on Detroit
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
RubberSoul
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,710
And1: 3,195
Joined: May 23, 2014
       

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#18 » by RubberSoul » Sun Nov 6, 2016 8:48 pm

Lions couldn't have made it easier on them on 4th and 4.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
BigDee
RealGM
Posts: 16,175
And1: 1,381
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
Location: Wisconsin
     

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#19 » by BigDee » Sun Nov 6, 2016 8:49 pm

Is Diggs there only wr.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,684
And1: 27,268
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: ATL: Week 9 

Post#20 » by trwi7 » Sun Nov 6, 2016 8:54 pm

Lions suck balls.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.

Return to Green Bay Packers