RealGM

Pop quiz, hot shots.

I voted Romo, but now regret it...is there a "do something productive on sundays instead of watch football" option?

Doesn't really matter, Hundley actually isn't that bad.Problem is even with a good QB like Hundley this is a 4-12 team.Probably 7-9 with a pro bowl caliber QB and 10 or 11 wins with a top 5 all time QB.

We don't have a roster that could go 10-6 like with a Case Keenum type like the Vikings for example.

Hundley

It's kind of moot. We don't have an OL

Hundley, but we're **** regardless.

rilamann wrote:Doesn't really matter, Hundley actually isn't that bad.Problem is even with a good QB like Hundley this is a 4-12 team.Probably 7-9 with a pro bowl caliber QB and 10 or 11 wins with a top 5 all time QB.

We don't have a roster that could go 10-6 like with a Case Keenum type like the Vikings for example.

I think it depends if they think they can get Aaron back. If there's a shot, they should call Romo and try to tread water. If he's out all year, go with Hundley. If he sucks, we get a decent draft pick. If he's good, we can trade him for a decent draft pick. Win/win.

Even if you replaced Aaron Rodgers with someone like Matt Ryan this is probably still only a 9-7 team, maybe.

Mags FTW wrote:

rilamann wrote:Doesn't really matter, Hundley actually isn't that bad.Problem is even with a good QB like Hundley this is a 4-12 team.Probably 7-9 with a pro bowl caliber QB and 10 or 11 wins with a top 5 all time QB.

We don't have a roster that could go 10-6 like with a Case Keenum type like the Vikings for example.

I think it depends if they think they can get Aaron back. If there's a shot, they should call Romo and try to tread water. If he's out all year, go with Hundley. If he sucks, we get a decent draft pick. If he's good, we can trade him for a decent draft pick. Win/win.

I hear what you are saying, but even if Rodgers comes back in December and this team has more than 5 wins I'll be pretty surprised.

If this team was capable of treading water without Rodgers they'd be able do it with Hundley.This team isn't sniffing a #6 seed with anything less than a MVP caliber QB.

Whatever leads to the most losses.

Kap, if only for the general litness that will ensue on @JScomments

I'd like to see what Hundley can do with reps with the #1s. What's the point of keeping him as a backup if he can't play when called on?

I'd call Kaep and Romo, too. Romo probably says no. Kaepernick is worth bringing in for a workout to see if he can still play. His athleticism, at the very least, would give them a weapon out of the backfield.

So I don't see this as an either/or. Do it all.

"Hundley is our guy" - MM in the post game

Uncle Rico has the arm

Hundley isn't bad. It's just we can't field an offensive line.

He will look better as the season goes on. But the tackle situation is a shid show.

Kap would be interesting but MM would have no clue how to use him.

I am sure Romo is thinking how much he would love to leave the booth and play behind the Packers O-line.

jazzfanWA wrote:I am sure Romo is thinking how much he would love to leave the booth and play behind the Packers O-line.

Even if the Packers line was healthy I doubt Romo would leave the booth. He's been hurt a ton in his career and can probably ask for whatever he wants on his next contract because CBS isn't going to want to lose him and if they don't meet his demands, some other network probably will.

On the bright side the Bucks start early this year

Get Taysom Hill back and let him run until he gets hurt