Game 7: Saints @ Packers
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 92,660
- And1: 45,229
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
Charles Davis is a maroon
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,593
- And1: 433
- Joined: Dec 30, 2014
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
dools644 wrote:The most disappointing part of this to me is that Jones wasn't used at all to help Hundley. There was a lot of running but never to set up the pass.
This team is in a lot of trouble. The defense might be the worst edition ever. Six wins is looking like a mountain.
The D has play extremely well against a great saints O. Forced two turnovers and has been on the field all game.
Bucks fandom bringing me happiness still seems like a dream.
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
- thomchatt3rton
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,387
- And1: 2,228
- Joined: Jun 11, 2009
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
I saw that 3rd-and-2 conversion play coming a f*cking mile away
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 110,861
- And1: 26,372
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
Brees QB sneak from the 2 is hilarious and something McCarthy would love to do.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,994
- And1: 7,273
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
Xanadu wrote:dools644 wrote:The most disappointing part of this to me is that Jones wasn't used at all to help Hundley. There was a lot of running but never to set up the pass.
This team is in a lot of trouble. The defense might be the worst edition ever. Six wins is looking like a mountain.
The D has play extremely well against a great saints O. Forced two turnovers and has been on the field all game.
Indeed. They have nothing to be ashamed about. This loss is on McCarthy all the way.
Do it for Chuck
Re: RE: Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,860
- And1: 19,660
- Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Re: RE: Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
trwi7 wrote:MickeyDavis wrote:Someone please tell McCarthy it's the 4th quarter. Thank you.
And that they're losing. He's calling plays like we're up by 10 (those play calls still would've been stupid if we were up 10.)
Yeah that last possession was completely baffling. Mccarthy not going to open it up until its too late.
Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 237
- And1: 134
- Joined: Feb 05, 2015
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
Xanadu wrote:dools644 wrote:The most disappointing part of this to me is that Jones wasn't used at all to help Hundley. There was a lot of running but never to set up the pass.
This team is in a lot of trouble. The defense might be the worst edition ever. Six wins is looking like a mountain.
The D has play extremely well against a great saints O. Forced two turnovers and has been on the field all game.
I strongly disagree. In the end points are all that matter so yes, in a way they did their job. But they have looked atrocious on the whole.
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,412
- And1: 9,993
- Joined: May 12, 2002
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
midranger wrote:What a joke that series was. Here comes the TD to seal the game.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
- thomchatt3rton
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,387
- And1: 2,228
- Joined: Jun 11, 2009
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
RRyder823 wrote:thomchatt3rton wrote:RRyder823 wrote:If u only scored 16 points on rookie mode you suck and need a new game.
Sent from my SM-G892A using RealGM mobile app
Undeniably true they've only scored 16. Can't take that fact away. But their O is trending upwards bigtime.
True. Just that the Saints got a damn good offense and will agree slot of solid defenses so it shouldn't be overlooked
Sent from my SM-G892A using RealGM mobile app
I'm not sure how good NO's offense is on the road- other than the 34 pts they put up @ CAR (which largely came off 3 Cam Newton INTs) they haven't scored a ton away from New Orleans.
But even still, against this D, they should be lighting us up. The difference is the 2 picks by Brees and the fact that they didn't in general wake up until the 3rd quarter (since time they've been killing us).
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
- FAH1223
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,875
- And1: 6,969
- Joined: Nov 01, 2005
- Location: Laurel, MD
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
thomchatt3rton wrote:I saw that 3rd-and-2 conversion play coming a f*cking mile away
Why doesn't MM run those plays? It's money against Dom
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
- rilamann
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,825
- And1: 13,223
- Joined: Jun 20, 2003
- Location: Bobby!! Bobby!! Bobby!!
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
If we can't beat a mediocre Saints team on wet grass with our defense getting 2 turnovers, yeah we're probably going 5-11...maybe.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,593
- And1: 433
- Joined: Dec 30, 2014
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
dools644 wrote:Xanadu wrote:dools644 wrote:The most disappointing part of this to me is that Jones wasn't used at all to help Hundley. There was a lot of running but never to set up the pass.
This team is in a lot of trouble. The defense might be the worst edition ever. Six wins is looking like a mountain.
The D has play extremely well against a great saints O. Forced two turnovers and has been on the field all game.
I strongly disagree. In the end points are all that matter so yes, in a way they did their job. But they have looked atrocious on the whole.
Right now only 19 points and again when we constantly put them in a bad spot because of bad field postion. Circumstances matter and again they haven't look that bad at all.
Bucks fandom bringing me happiness still seems like a dream.
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,431
- And1: 166
- Joined: Apr 24, 2006
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
If you don't trust Hundley in a situation where you need to move the ball (or period honestly) against the Saints defense why is he even QB right now?
Go Packers, Go Bulls, Go Cubs, Go Hawkeyes, Go Blackhawks
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 98,445
- And1: 34,961
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
That's another thing I've never seen. Just put it over the line and pull it back immediately.
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 237
- And1: 134
- Joined: Feb 05, 2015
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
No game is a given with this squad. Cleveland on the road is entirely losable.
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 110,861
- And1: 26,372
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
Can't wait to see McCarthy's play calling down by two scores with 5 minutes left.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,653
- And1: 42
- Joined: Jun 28, 2006
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
Apparently ok to hold and tackle our db trying to make a tackle
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,492
- And1: 1,985
- Joined: Dec 18, 2005
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
Oh wait, he can just go over the top? Whoops, forgot about that.
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 110,861
- And1: 26,372
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
dools644 wrote:No game is a given with this squad. Cleveland on the road is entirely losable.
I think we might be favored against the Ravens and will be against the Browns but underdogs against everyone else, even the Bears who looks surprisingly competent.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 237
- And1: 134
- Joined: Feb 05, 2015
Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers
Xanadu wrote:dools644 wrote:Xanadu wrote:The D has play extremely well against a great saints O. Forced two turnovers and has been on the field all game.
I strongly disagree. In the end points are all that matter so yes, in a way they did their job. But they have looked atrocious on the whole.
Right now only 19 points and again when we constantly put them in a bad spot because of bad field postion. Circumstances matter and again they haven't look that bad at all.
Lol, agree to disagree. They've looked terrible plenty. Blitzes not getting home, receivers running free with farmland around them, running backs shredding them at will.
The two picks are the reason the saints don't have 45 points. Circumstances matter, but I don't know how any body watching this is encouraged by the defense. They've given up 470 yards. They are terrible. Just that the offense is too now.