ImageImage

Game 7: Saints @ Packers

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 92,660
And1: 45,229
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#321 » by MickeyDavis » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:42 pm

Charles Davis is a maroon
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Xanadu
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,593
And1: 433
Joined: Dec 30, 2014
     

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#322 » by Xanadu » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:42 pm

dools644 wrote:The most disappointing part of this to me is that Jones wasn't used at all to help Hundley. There was a lot of running but never to set up the pass.

This team is in a lot of trouble. The defense might be the worst edition ever. Six wins is looking like a mountain.

The D has play extremely well against a great saints O. Forced two turnovers and has been on the field all game.
Bucks fandom bringing me happiness still seems like a dream.
User avatar
thomchatt3rton
Head Coach
Posts: 6,387
And1: 2,228
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#323 » by thomchatt3rton » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:42 pm

I saw that 3rd-and-2 conversion play coming a f*cking mile away
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,861
And1: 26,372
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#324 » by trwi7 » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:43 pm

Brees QB sneak from the 2 is hilarious and something McCarthy would love to do.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 15,994
And1: 7,273
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#325 » by jakecronus8 » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:43 pm

Xanadu wrote:
dools644 wrote:The most disappointing part of this to me is that Jones wasn't used at all to help Hundley. There was a lot of running but never to set up the pass.

This team is in a lot of trouble. The defense might be the worst edition ever. Six wins is looking like a mountain.

The D has play extremely well against a great saints O. Forced two turnovers and has been on the field all game.


Indeed. They have nothing to be ashamed about. This loss is on McCarthy all the way.
Do it for Chuck
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 23,860
And1: 19,660
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: RE: Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#326 » by WeekapaugGroove » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:43 pm

trwi7 wrote:
MickeyDavis wrote:Someone please tell McCarthy it's the 4th quarter. Thank you.


And that they're losing. He's calling plays like we're up by 10 (those play calls still would've been stupid if we were up 10.)

Yeah that last possession was completely baffling. Mccarthy not going to open it up until its too late.

Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
dools644
Sophomore
Posts: 237
And1: 134
Joined: Feb 05, 2015

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#327 » by dools644 » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:43 pm

Xanadu wrote:
dools644 wrote:The most disappointing part of this to me is that Jones wasn't used at all to help Hundley. There was a lot of running but never to set up the pass.

This team is in a lot of trouble. The defense might be the worst edition ever. Six wins is looking like a mountain.

The D has play extremely well against a great saints O. Forced two turnovers and has been on the field all game.


I strongly disagree. In the end points are all that matter so yes, in a way they did their job. But they have looked atrocious on the whole.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 38,412
And1: 9,993
Joined: May 12, 2002

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#328 » by midranger » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:44 pm

midranger wrote:What a joke that series was. Here comes the TD to seal the game.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
User avatar
thomchatt3rton
Head Coach
Posts: 6,387
And1: 2,228
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#329 » by thomchatt3rton » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:44 pm

RRyder823 wrote:
thomchatt3rton wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:If u only scored 16 points on rookie mode you suck and need a new game.



Sent from my SM-G892A using RealGM mobile app


Undeniably true they've only scored 16. Can't take that fact away. But their O is trending upwards bigtime.

True. Just that the Saints got a damn good offense and will agree slot of solid defenses so it shouldn't be overlooked

Sent from my SM-G892A using RealGM mobile app


I'm not sure how good NO's offense is on the road- other than the 34 pts they put up @ CAR (which largely came off 3 Cam Newton INTs) they haven't scored a ton away from New Orleans.

But even still, against this D, they should be lighting us up. The difference is the 2 picks by Brees and the fact that they didn't in general wake up until the 3rd quarter (since time they've been killing us).
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 15,875
And1: 6,969
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#330 » by FAH1223 » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:44 pm

thomchatt3rton wrote:I saw that 3rd-and-2 conversion play coming a f*cking mile away


Why doesn't MM run those plays? It's money against Dom
Image
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 25,825
And1: 13,223
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Bobby!! Bobby!! Bobby!!
     

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#331 » by rilamann » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:45 pm

If we can't beat a mediocre Saints team on wet grass with our defense getting 2 turnovers, yeah we're probably going 5-11...maybe.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
Xanadu
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,593
And1: 433
Joined: Dec 30, 2014
     

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#332 » by Xanadu » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:46 pm

dools644 wrote:
Xanadu wrote:
dools644 wrote:The most disappointing part of this to me is that Jones wasn't used at all to help Hundley. There was a lot of running but never to set up the pass.

This team is in a lot of trouble. The defense might be the worst edition ever. Six wins is looking like a mountain.

The D has play extremely well against a great saints O. Forced two turnovers and has been on the field all game.


I strongly disagree. In the end points are all that matter so yes, in a way they did their job. But they have looked atrocious on the whole.

Right now only 19 points and again when we constantly put them in a bad spot because of bad field postion. Circumstances matter and again they haven't look that bad at all.
Bucks fandom bringing me happiness still seems like a dream.
bcl20
Starter
Posts: 2,431
And1: 166
Joined: Apr 24, 2006

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#333 » by bcl20 » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:46 pm

If you don't trust Hundley in a situation where you need to move the ball (or period honestly) against the Saints defense why is he even QB right now?
Go Packers, Go Bulls, Go Cubs, Go Hawkeyes, Go Blackhawks
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,445
And1: 34,961
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#334 » by ReasonablySober » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:47 pm

That's another thing I've never seen. Just put it over the line and pull it back immediately.
dools644
Sophomore
Posts: 237
And1: 134
Joined: Feb 05, 2015

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#335 » by dools644 » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:47 pm

No game is a given with this squad. Cleveland on the road is entirely losable.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,861
And1: 26,372
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#336 » by trwi7 » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:47 pm

Can't wait to see McCarthy's play calling down by two scores with 5 minutes left.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
mnstinks
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,653
And1: 42
Joined: Jun 28, 2006

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#337 » by mnstinks » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:47 pm

Apparently ok to hold and tackle our db trying to make a tackle
dogswithbeesintheirmouths
Head Coach
Posts: 6,492
And1: 1,985
Joined: Dec 18, 2005

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#338 » by dogswithbeesintheirmouths » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:48 pm

Oh wait, he can just go over the top? Whoops, forgot about that.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,861
And1: 26,372
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#339 » by trwi7 » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:50 pm

dools644 wrote:No game is a given with this squad. Cleveland on the road is entirely losable.


I think we might be favored against the Ravens and will be against the Browns but underdogs against everyone else, even the Bears who looks surprisingly competent.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
dools644
Sophomore
Posts: 237
And1: 134
Joined: Feb 05, 2015

Re: Game 7: Saints @ Packers 

Post#340 » by dools644 » Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:50 pm

Xanadu wrote:
dools644 wrote:
Xanadu wrote:The D has play extremely well against a great saints O. Forced two turnovers and has been on the field all game.


I strongly disagree. In the end points are all that matter so yes, in a way they did their job. But they have looked atrocious on the whole.

Right now only 19 points and again when we constantly put them in a bad spot because of bad field postion. Circumstances matter and again they haven't look that bad at all.


Lol, agree to disagree. They've looked terrible plenty. Blitzes not getting home, receivers running free with farmland around them, running backs shredding them at will.

The two picks are the reason the saints don't have 45 points. Circumstances matter, but I don't know how any body watching this is encouraged by the defense. They've given up 470 yards. They are terrible. Just that the offense is too now.

Return to Green Bay Packers