ImageImage

ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 30,423
And1: 13,939
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#1 » by humanrefutation » Wed Dec 20, 2017 2:12 am

https://sports.yahoo.com/2018-pro-bowl-steelers-place-nfl-high-eight-players-including-ryan-shazier-015717543.html

Not surprised that you didn't have any Packers making the Pro Bowl. But there are two former Packers - Hyde and Hayward.

Saints had two running backs named - Ingram and Kamara. I wonder when was the last time two running backs from the same team made the Pro Bowl?
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 34,503
And1: 7,308
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#2 » by Mags FTW » Wed Dec 20, 2017 2:27 am

TT should be embarrassed.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 17,219
And1: 2,938
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#3 » by BUCKnation » Wed Dec 20, 2017 2:54 am

Adams was probably the only one who deserved it all things considered. Maybe Bakh or Lane Taylor as well.
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 30,423
And1: 13,939
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#4 » by humanrefutation » Wed Dec 20, 2017 4:12 am

Daniels is a first alternate, as is Ripkowski. Bakh is a second alternate.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,860
And1: 26,370
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#5 » by trwi7 » Wed Dec 20, 2017 3:58 pm

Mike Sherman is the new head coach of the Montreal Alouettes.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Balls2TheWalls
RealGM
Posts: 19,574
And1: 3,597
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
         

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#6 » by Balls2TheWalls » Thu Dec 21, 2017 12:43 am

Bakh not being a pro bowler is awful. He is the only person on the team that 100% absolutely deserves to be there.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
XtremeDunkz
General Manager
Posts: 8,328
And1: 6,792
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
       

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#7 » by XtremeDunkz » Thu Dec 21, 2017 12:45 am

Yeah we didn't need Hayward or Hyde at all. Those compensatory picks are way more valuable. SMH.
10/27/16
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden.:lol: Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 22,466
And1: 23,557
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#8 » by Ron Swanson » Thu Dec 21, 2017 3:09 pm

I stopped caring about the Pro Bowl roster 10 years ago because it means absolutely nothing. AP All-Pro team is the only thing that matters.
raysbookclub
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,625
And1: 1,166
Joined: Jan 26, 2008
     

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#9 » by raysbookclub » Thu Dec 21, 2017 3:51 pm

Read on Twitter


Yep. Capers just hasn't been given the talent to field a good defense. Must be TT not giving him Pro Bowl-caliber players.
Flames24Rulz
Head Coach
Posts: 6,398
And1: 343
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
       

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#10 » by Flames24Rulz » Thu Dec 21, 2017 5:16 pm

"True skills" is such a slap in the face to Capers, lol.
User avatar
crkone
RealGM
Posts: 28,566
And1: 9,327
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#11 » by crkone » Thu Dec 21, 2017 6:44 pm

books wrote:
Read on Twitter


Yep. Capers just hasn't been given the talent to field a good defense. Must be TT not giving him Pro Bowl-caliber players.



I mean the list of players who he had that aren't on the team anymore and are/were scrubs/out of the league more than doubles the amount of pro bowlers who aren't on the team. He could have utilized talent better but he's had some terrible players to work with also. Casey was also amazing his rookie year and then had nagging injuries the next few seasons. I have no idea about Micah Hyde. On tape he was too slow to cover WRs/RBs and too small to cover TEs. On a team with better communication in the secondary he's thriving.

Code: Select all

o- - -  \o          __|
   o/   /|          vv`\
  /|     |              |
   |    / \_            |
  / \   |               |
 /  |                   |
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 30,423
And1: 13,939
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#12 » by humanrefutation » Fri Dec 22, 2017 1:22 am

Looks like Vince McMahon is gonna get back into football. He just sold $100M of his WWE stock to invest in football, and he's trademarking XFL and "URFL" related ideas.
HKPackFan
RealGM
Posts: 14,751
And1: 10,220
Joined: Jan 14, 2014
Location: Hong Kong
   

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#13 » by HKPackFan » Fri Dec 22, 2017 10:37 am

Mags FTW wrote:TT should be embarrassed.


I would like a reporter to ask him something about that, I feel like TT does like one softball interview a year in Aug when everyone is in a hopeful mindset.


No wonder MM will never get fired by TT, TT is a vampire and hates talking to humans and MM does all of it for him.
#FreeChuckDiesel
User avatar
Iheartfootball
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,749
And1: 4,176
Joined: May 09, 2014
Location: The Bay Area, but not back down
     

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#14 » by Iheartfootball » Fri Dec 22, 2017 4:56 pm

Mags FTW wrote:TT should be embarrassed.


I don't think TT feels anything. Survey says he's probably a replicant.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 34,503
And1: 7,308
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#15 » by Mags FTW » Fri Dec 22, 2017 5:34 pm

RIP Dick Enberg

User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 30,423
And1: 13,939
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#16 » by humanrefutation » Fri Dec 22, 2017 5:35 pm

Mags FTW wrote:RIP Dick Enberg



Oh, my!
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 25,825
And1: 13,223
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Bobby!! Bobby!! Bobby!!
     

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#17 » by rilamann » Sun Dec 24, 2017 7:10 pm

Flames24Rulz wrote:"True skills" is such a slap in the face to Capers, lol.


I think it's a huge slap in the face to the Packers as an organization, Dom Capers is a problem but he's only part of the problem. Things like Hayward and Hyde going elsewhere and looking like significantly better players goes much, much deeper than just Dom Capers.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 25,825
And1: 13,223
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Bobby!! Bobby!! Bobby!!
     

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#18 » by rilamann » Sun Dec 24, 2017 7:13 pm

Just seen the weirdest INT in the Saints Falcons game....lol
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 18,337
And1: 6,489
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#19 » by Profound23 » Sun Dec 24, 2017 7:19 pm

rilamann wrote:Just seen the weirdest INT in the Saints Falcons game....lol


That was crazy.

Also crazy that the Saints have the offensive and defensive rookie of the year.
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 25,825
And1: 13,223
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Bobby!! Bobby!! Bobby!!
     

Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers) 

Post#20 » by rilamann » Sun Dec 24, 2017 7:21 pm

I want to see the Saints play the Vikings in the playoffs, I think the Saints are the only team that can beat the Vikings in the NFC. That and it would be a great game.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****

Return to Green Bay Packers