ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
- humanrefutation
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 30,423
- And1: 13,939
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
https://sports.yahoo.com/2018-pro-bowl-steelers-place-nfl-high-eight-players-including-ryan-shazier-015717543.html
Not surprised that you didn't have any Packers making the Pro Bowl. But there are two former Packers - Hyde and Hayward.
Saints had two running backs named - Ingram and Kamara. I wonder when was the last time two running backs from the same team made the Pro Bowl?
Not surprised that you didn't have any Packers making the Pro Bowl. But there are two former Packers - Hyde and Hayward.
Saints had two running backs named - Ingram and Kamara. I wonder when was the last time two running backs from the same team made the Pro Bowl?
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,503
- And1: 7,308
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
TT should be embarrassed.
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
- BUCKnation
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,219
- And1: 2,938
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
Adams was probably the only one who deserved it all things considered. Maybe Bakh or Lane Taylor as well.
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
- humanrefutation
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 30,423
- And1: 13,939
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
Daniels is a first alternate, as is Ripkowski. Bakh is a second alternate.
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 110,860
- And1: 26,370
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
Mike Sherman is the new head coach of the Montreal Alouettes.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,574
- And1: 3,597
- Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
Bakh not being a pro bowler is awful. He is the only person on the team that 100% absolutely deserves to be there.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,328
- And1: 6,792
- Joined: Mar 08, 2012
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
Yeah we didn't need Hayward or Hyde at all. Those compensatory picks are way more valuable. SMH.
10/27/16
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden. Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
- Ron Swanson
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,466
- And1: 23,557
- Joined: May 15, 2013
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
I stopped caring about the Pro Bowl roster 10 years ago because it means absolutely nothing. AP All-Pro team is the only thing that matters.
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,625
- And1: 1,166
- Joined: Jan 26, 2008
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
Yep. Capers just hasn't been given the talent to field a good defense. Must be TT not giving him Pro Bowl-caliber players.
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,398
- And1: 343
- Joined: Dec 23, 2004
- Location: Rockford, IL
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
"True skills" is such a slap in the face to Capers, lol.
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
- crkone
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,566
- And1: 9,327
- Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
books wrote:
Yep. Capers just hasn't been given the talent to field a good defense. Must be TT not giving him Pro Bowl-caliber players.
I mean the list of players who he had that aren't on the team anymore and are/were scrubs/out of the league more than doubles the amount of pro bowlers who aren't on the team. He could have utilized talent better but he's had some terrible players to work with also. Casey was also amazing his rookie year and then had nagging injuries the next few seasons. I have no idea about Micah Hyde. On tape he was too slow to cover WRs/RBs and too small to cover TEs. On a team with better communication in the secondary he's thriving.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
- humanrefutation
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 30,423
- And1: 13,939
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
Looks like Vince McMahon is gonna get back into football. He just sold $100M of his WWE stock to invest in football, and he's trademarking XFL and "URFL" related ideas.
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,751
- And1: 10,220
- Joined: Jan 14, 2014
- Location: Hong Kong
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
Mags FTW wrote:TT should be embarrassed.
I would like a reporter to ask him something about that, I feel like TT does like one softball interview a year in Aug when everyone is in a hopeful mindset.
No wonder MM will never get fired by TT, TT is a vampire and hates talking to humans and MM does all of it for him.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
- Iheartfootball
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,749
- And1: 4,176
- Joined: May 09, 2014
- Location: The Bay Area, but not back down
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
Mags FTW wrote:TT should be embarrassed.
I don't think TT feels anything. Survey says he's probably a replicant.
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,503
- And1: 7,308
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
- humanrefutation
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 30,423
- And1: 13,939
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
- rilamann
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,825
- And1: 13,223
- Joined: Jun 20, 2003
- Location: Bobby!! Bobby!! Bobby!!
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
Flames24Rulz wrote:"True skills" is such a slap in the face to Capers, lol.
I think it's a huge slap in the face to the Packers as an organization, Dom Capers is a problem but he's only part of the problem. Things like Hayward and Hyde going elsewhere and looking like significantly better players goes much, much deeper than just Dom Capers.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
- rilamann
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,825
- And1: 13,223
- Joined: Jun 20, 2003
- Location: Bobby!! Bobby!! Bobby!!
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
Just seen the weirdest INT in the Saints Falcons game....lol
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,337
- And1: 6,489
- Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
rilamann wrote:Just seen the weirdest INT in the Saints Falcons game....lol
That was crazy.
Also crazy that the Saints have the offensive and defensive rookie of the year.
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
- rilamann
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,825
- And1: 13,223
- Joined: Jun 20, 2003
- Location: Bobby!! Bobby!! Bobby!!
Re: ATL Week 16: Pro Browlers Announced (No Packers)
I want to see the Saints play the Vikings in the playoffs, I think the Saints are the only team that can beat the Vikings in the NFC. That and it would be a great game.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****