What kind of contract you bringing these guys back on?
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2018 6:32 am
Alot of fans love to use the phrases "just get rid of them", "I cant wait till goes somewhere else" or things along the lines of "We cant let him leave no matter what" when it comes to impending FAs but generally the truth of it is that it comes down to cost. Both high and low. If a guy comes cheap enough or doesnt break the bank like one would expect it generally becomes a good idea to bring them back so I was curious what's the "limit" you'd go on a "per year" basis to bring some of these guys back next year and why
Just a curious thought exercise but here we go:
Cobb- An interesting one imo. Alot of people swirling around the forums like to say overpaid very quickly when it comes to him but looking around the league his contract really doesnt seem like that big of an albatross when it comes to the top slot receivers in the league. The real question is whether it's even worth it to pay for a slot receiver to begin with? I say yes.... To an extent.... If he can be retained for say around 7-8 per year I'd argue it's a damn good idea to bring him back especially considering the youth at the position is a big question. If you answered no to the previous question then it's probably a hard pass
Ha Ha- This boards new favorite whipping boy. Hes not nearly as bad as some would like to pretend. Not the elite Saftey that PFF had him rated but still, despite popular opinion, is a good but not great Saftey. "If" he can be retained on a contract slightly above what say Burnet got from Pittsburgh, which would be in the 6-8 range I say go for especially considering the mess at Saftey we're going to have if he leaves. (Probably a long shot considering the inflation that happens every FA period but hey it's the point of the exercise)
Bulaga- I think many have allready written him off as gone due to age and injuries but I'm not so sure. Yes hes getting long in the tooth and has injury concerns but other teams know those things about him too so hes not going to command a big contract. So with that in mind even with those concerns he can still play, when healthy, so unless they plan on going Tackle in the 1st round this year if they can bring back Bulaga at a price point around 5-6 a year I'd do it and not think twice. Even if they draft a Tackle early that ends up taking over the starting role I wouldn't concern myself with paying Bulaga to simply be a top flight level backup and provide much needed depth
Mathews- Yes hes done and will never be even just good again. That said "if" they could get him for a little above the vet minimum its hard to argue he couldn't even be a rotational guy should they draft a pass rusher high
Montgomery- I actually like Monty as a scat back but anything more then the minimum is a no go
Sent from my SM-G892A using RealGM mobile app
Just a curious thought exercise but here we go:
Cobb- An interesting one imo. Alot of people swirling around the forums like to say overpaid very quickly when it comes to him but looking around the league his contract really doesnt seem like that big of an albatross when it comes to the top slot receivers in the league. The real question is whether it's even worth it to pay for a slot receiver to begin with? I say yes.... To an extent.... If he can be retained for say around 7-8 per year I'd argue it's a damn good idea to bring him back especially considering the youth at the position is a big question. If you answered no to the previous question then it's probably a hard pass
Ha Ha- This boards new favorite whipping boy. Hes not nearly as bad as some would like to pretend. Not the elite Saftey that PFF had him rated but still, despite popular opinion, is a good but not great Saftey. "If" he can be retained on a contract slightly above what say Burnet got from Pittsburgh, which would be in the 6-8 range I say go for especially considering the mess at Saftey we're going to have if he leaves. (Probably a long shot considering the inflation that happens every FA period but hey it's the point of the exercise)
Bulaga- I think many have allready written him off as gone due to age and injuries but I'm not so sure. Yes hes getting long in the tooth and has injury concerns but other teams know those things about him too so hes not going to command a big contract. So with that in mind even with those concerns he can still play, when healthy, so unless they plan on going Tackle in the 1st round this year if they can bring back Bulaga at a price point around 5-6 a year I'd do it and not think twice. Even if they draft a Tackle early that ends up taking over the starting role I wouldn't concern myself with paying Bulaga to simply be a top flight level backup and provide much needed depth
Mathews- Yes hes done and will never be even just good again. That said "if" they could get him for a little above the vet minimum its hard to argue he couldn't even be a rotational guy should they draft a pass rusher high
Montgomery- I actually like Monty as a scat back but anything more then the minimum is a no go
Sent from my SM-G892A using RealGM mobile app