Grade the draft
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation
Grade the draft
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 106,665
- And1: 41,258
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Grade the draft
CB Eric Stokes, Georgia (Round 1, Pick 29)
C Josh Myers, Ohio State (Round 2, Pick 62)
WR Amari Rodgers, Clemson (Round 3, Pick 85)
G Royce Newman, Ole Miss (Round 4, Pick 142)
DT Tedarrell Slaton, Florida (Round 5, Pick 173)
CB Shemar Jean-Charles, Appalachian State (Round 5, Pick 178)
G Cole Van Lanen, Wisconsin (Round 6, Pick 214)
LB Isaiah McDuffie, Boston College (Round 6, Pick 220)
RB Kylin Hill, Mississippi State (Round 7, Pick 256)
Yea, everyone knows it's a fools errand to grade a draft immediately. But do it anyway.
C Josh Myers, Ohio State (Round 2, Pick 62)
WR Amari Rodgers, Clemson (Round 3, Pick 85)
G Royce Newman, Ole Miss (Round 4, Pick 142)
DT Tedarrell Slaton, Florida (Round 5, Pick 173)
CB Shemar Jean-Charles, Appalachian State (Round 5, Pick 178)
G Cole Van Lanen, Wisconsin (Round 6, Pick 214)
LB Isaiah McDuffie, Boston College (Round 6, Pick 220)
RB Kylin Hill, Mississippi State (Round 7, Pick 256)
Yea, everyone knows it's a fools errand to grade a draft immediately. But do it anyway.
Re: Grade the draft
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,368
- And1: 1,418
- Joined: Jun 23, 2010
Re: Grade the draft
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 101,546
- And1: 54,795
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
Re: Grade the draft
- tski1972
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,291
- And1: 3,760
- Joined: May 24, 2011
- Location: Wow-saw, WI
- Contact:
-
Re: Grade the draft
I loved it, it was better than Cats.
http://twitter.com/MarkIsOld

"Because of Giannis, the once lousy Bucks are back in the NBA conversation." - 60 Minutes

"Because of Giannis, the once lousy Bucks are back in the NBA conversation." - 60 Minutes
Re: Grade the draft
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,675
- And1: 27,265
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Grade the draft
MickeyDavis wrote:B
Mickey during the draft
Great pick
Great pick
Great pick
Great pick
Great pick
Great pick
Great pick
Great pick
Great pick
Mickey grading the draft
B
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Grade the draft
- LittleRooster
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,599
- And1: 3,247
- Joined: Apr 02, 2010
-
Re: Grade the draft
trwi7 wrote:MickeyDavis wrote:B
Mickey during the draft
Great pick
Great pick
Great pick
Great pick
Great pick
Great pick
Great pick
Great pick
Great pick
Mickey grading the draft
B
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Grade the draft
- Wisky4life
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,282
- And1: 1,214
- Joined: Feb 05, 2014
- Contact:
Re: Grade the draft
B-
Thought this years draft was a little short on talent after the top 20 compared to past years.
Would have liked us to move up in the 1st.
Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app
Thought this years draft was a little short on talent after the top 20 compared to past years.
Would have liked us to move up in the 1st.
Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app
“We’re going to turn this team around 360 degrees.” –Jason Kidd
Re: Grade the draft
- LikeABosh
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,078
- And1: 8,821
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Grade the draft
I won't know what to grade it until Mr. Sober grades it
Re: Grade the draft
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 106,665
- And1: 41,258
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
Re: Grade the draft
LikeABosh wrote:I won't know what to grade it until Mr. Sober grades it
Sir, I gave it a B.
They somehow took guys I didn't particularly want at their spot, but managed to take the positions I was hoping for. Since I don't know dick, I'm gonna be happy they looked to have plugged some needed holes.

Re: Grade the draft
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,675
- And1: 27,265
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Grade the draft
ReasonablySober wrote:I don't know dick
Going to get this framed and hang it on my wall.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Grade the draft
- LikeABosh
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,078
- And1: 8,821
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Grade the draft
ReasonablySober wrote:LikeABosh wrote:I won't know what to grade it until Mr. Sober grades it
Sir, I gave it a B.
They somehow took guys I didn't particularly want at their spot, but managed to take the positions I was hoping for. Since I don't know dick, I'm gonna be happy they looked to have plugged some needed holes.
Ok thanks. I'd say A- and meet you halfway, but I think B+ is fine. Filled some needs but didn't do anything that jumped out at me
Re: Grade the draft
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,618
- And1: 1,756
- Joined: Oct 04, 2011
- Location: Riverwest
-
Re: Grade the draft
D- cuz they didn't get Rodgers weapons like all the casuals wanted.
Re: Grade the draft
- MoMM
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,549
- And1: 1,766
- Joined: Jan 08, 2002
- Location: Brazilian in Barcelona
- Contact:
-
Re: Grade the draft
https://www.nfl.com/news/2021-nfl-draft-final-quick-snap-grades-for-all-32-teams
=> Final Grade by them: A
Day 1 grade: A
Day 2 grade: A-
Day 3 grade: A
Analysis: Cornerback was a major need for the Packers, and with receiver Rashod Bateman off the board to the Ravens, they decided to pick up the speedy and competitive Stokes with their first-round selection. Myers will be a sturdy professional in the pivot for the next few years, though it will be interesting to see how other center prospects who were available at No. 62 will work out for their teams. Rodgers was an excellent selection in Round 3 to give the team a much-needed returner and playmaker in the slot (and sometimes in the backfield).
The Packers found their right tackle in Newman, who isn’t a plus athlete but can move defenders off the ball and is reliable in pass protection. Van Lanen is another solid late-round lineman. The defensive line got a big man up front in Slaton, who was unblockable at times for the Gators when fresh. Jean-Charles should contribute in the slot and outside, always fighting through the receiver to knock away passes. McDuffie was a great value for a team needing an active inside linebacker. Hill could stick as a third back and provide real value if Aaron Jones and/or AJ Dillon get hurt.
=> Final Grade by them: A
Re: Grade the draft
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,653
- And1: 1,885
- Joined: Jun 17, 2009
- Location: Out in the Driftless Area
-
Re: Grade the draft
"B" Before the draft, I was hoping they'd snag either DL, CB, OL, or and LB in the early rounds. That could be done while drafting the BPA at the time and still filling gaps. They got the Corner and some linemen, and Amari Rogers could be a real asset, so I should be happy. I'm kinda enh.., but then the Packers were mostly drafting near the end of each round, so the pool gets picked over by the time they select.
*******************************************************
Re: Grade the draft
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,024
- And1: 661
- Joined: Apr 25, 2003
Re: Grade the draft
Happiest with the draft I've been in a while. Pretty solid, defensible picks. Will be interesting to see if Gute picked the right center in Myers, as he had his pick of the litter.
Don't think we got any stars, but hard to do too much better where we drafted, IMO.
Don't think we got any stars, but hard to do too much better where we drafted, IMO.
Re: Grade the draft
- LittleRooster
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,599
- And1: 3,247
- Joined: Apr 02, 2010
-
Re: Grade the draft
A-
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Grade the draft
- HaroldinGMinor
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,298
- And1: 20,216
- Joined: Jan 23, 2013
-
Re: Grade the draft
Seems like a lot of high floor guys. Hopefully Stokes reaches his potential.
Edit: I'll add that with all the dudes they have locked into big contracts (and with a couple more on the horizon), they need a bunch of these guys to make the team and contribute in one way or another on their rookie deals.
Edit: I'll add that with all the dudes they have locked into big contracts (and with a couple more on the horizon), they need a bunch of these guys to make the team and contribute in one way or another on their rookie deals.
At a party given by a billionaire, Kurt Vonnegut informs Joseph Heller that their host had made more money in a single day than Heller had earned from his novel Catch-22.
Heller responds, “Yes, but I have something he will never have — ENOUGH.”
Heller responds, “Yes, but I have something he will never have — ENOUGH.”
Re: Grade the draft
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,500
- And1: 2,293
- Joined: May 27, 2005
-
Re: Grade the draft
I like everyone but Stokes. Hope he surprises me. or he stands next to King in training camp a lot and his speed magically transfers over.
B+
B+
Bucks in 6
Re: Grade the draft
-
- Junior
- Posts: 354
- And1: 317
- Joined: Aug 30, 2017
-
Re: Grade the draft
A++++++++.
Can never go wrong drafting a CB in round 1 or 2.
Taking a C in round 2 is a great use of a premium draft pick and he should be a starter day 1.
Team has needed a slot WR since before Cobb got injured and became ineffective about 6-7 years ago, so love the round 3 pick.
Using 3 picks on projected NFL guards, just one year after taking 2 guards and a C, is a sure fire way to make sure the interior offensive line continues to be a position of strength.
If and when the round 5 DT ever commits to getting into shape he could fill a run-stopper void that has only existed for about a decade now.
The 5th round CB and the 6th round LB look like they could contribute to STs and the Pack's STs sure could use some contributors.
The RB in round 7 looks like a potential steal and you need multiple RBs in MLF's offense.
I see both some potential future impact guys and some immediate contributors (which is really odd because I swear I read somewhere that no player who the Pack could have selected in round 1 in 2020 could have contributed to the team as a rookie last season).
Can never go wrong drafting a CB in round 1 or 2.
Taking a C in round 2 is a great use of a premium draft pick and he should be a starter day 1.
Team has needed a slot WR since before Cobb got injured and became ineffective about 6-7 years ago, so love the round 3 pick.
Using 3 picks on projected NFL guards, just one year after taking 2 guards and a C, is a sure fire way to make sure the interior offensive line continues to be a position of strength.
If and when the round 5 DT ever commits to getting into shape he could fill a run-stopper void that has only existed for about a decade now.
The 5th round CB and the 6th round LB look like they could contribute to STs and the Pack's STs sure could use some contributors.
The RB in round 7 looks like a potential steal and you need multiple RBs in MLF's offense.
I see both some potential future impact guys and some immediate contributors (which is really odd because I swear I read somewhere that no player who the Pack could have selected in round 1 in 2020 could have contributed to the team as a rookie last season).
Re: Grade the draft
- Matches Malone
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,693
- And1: 26,133
- Joined: Nov 23, 2005
-
Re: Grade the draft
Solid B from me. Filled some needs and got high upside guys. Kylin Hill in the 7th might be a steal as well. He's kind of like James White and if rumors were true, Packers had interest in White during FA.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?