LUKE23 wrote:I’m posting SOS links. Are you insinuating we should look at SOS some other way? If so, I’m assuming we are doing this for all objective/numerical arguments moving forward?
When have we not used SOS links to measure SOS? I’ve been here as long as you have.
I agree with you, but I think there are things that SOS doesn't consider, for example, playing Browns and Dolphins without their starting QB or SF with/without McCaffrey, let's say the team is a 60%, but without them it is more like 40%.
Packers is another example, facing us earlier in the season we wouldn't have Watson (injured), Amari was our returner and D was super bad. By the end of the season, Watson was playing (well), Nixon I don't even need to say anything and D was okayish. To sum up, depending on the week played you could be facing a bottom 5 team, or a top10-15 team.
Another point is that a win is a win, but it could have different margin of points, etc. SF and Vikings had the same record (13-4), but SF had a +173 in points, Vikings -3. That's why there is the discussion about being a legit 13-4 or not, for example.
Anyway, super hard to take in consideration injuries, trade, signings, rookie development, etc and there is no better way to do it right now, probably it will evolve in the future, just like the player stats evolved into advanced player stats.