RealGM

So start off with

9-7

7-9

I think... I hope it is too early for this discussion.

10-6, PLAYOFFS!

I have to wait and see what the roster looks like. Who we draft, trades, free agents. It's a tough schedule, or so it seems now. There will be teams that look tough that won't be and weak teams that turn it around. I can't wait

MickeyDavis wrote:I have to wait and see what the roster looks like. Who we draft, trades, free agents. It's a tough schedule, or so it seems now. There will be teams that look tough that won't be and weak teams that turn it around. I can't wait

Agreed. You can't make a season prediction until your roster is fully completed. We have a whole draft, and another series of cuts, and some possible trades.

Adding Moss and Turner? I'll go ahead and say 11-5. Adding Lynch and Jarrett? I'll say 9-7. Many different scenarios will play out.

9-7 is my guess I'm excited big time.

I'd say 11-5. So many young guys on the team with one more year of experience.

11-5

10-6, just because of how well the D came together at the end of the season.

But it is still too early to tell what will happen. We do need a couple of spots that need some work at.

16-0

No really, 9-7 and we get into the wild card game, win, and then we meat the bears in the first round and blow them out but we lose the in next round.

MickeyDavis wrote:I have to wait and see what the roster looks like. Who we draft, trades, free agents. It's a tough schedule, or so it seems now. There will be teams that look tough that won't be and weak teams that turn it around. I can't wait

OF course that's true but I thought it would be interesting to test how true that is. Right now based on last season, what we have now, our draft position, and TTs history of GMing - 9-7 seems about right.

Getting Moss OR Jackson AND Turner OR Norwood might mean 11-5. But I do not think TT is going to really get any of those guys. Moss maybe? So adding a couple good rookies and one year's experience for last years rookies= 9-7.

very early but right now I see 6-10.

DrugBust wrote:very early but right now I see 6-10.

Last year you were wildly positive at 11-5 / 10-6

and now this year - THAT conservative?

OK. May I ask why 6-10?

eagle13 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Last year you were wildly positive at 11-5 / 10-6

and now this year - THAT conservative?

OK. May I ask why 6-10?

Last year I thought we could go 11-5 or 10-6 not because of how good we were, but how bad our opponents were. This season I think our schedule is just much tougher:

I think we win at home against:

Detroit
Minnesota
Washington
Carolina
Oakland

I think on the road we'll beat:

Either Detroit or Minnesota but not both.

and that's it.

Our other road games are against:

Chicago
Dallas
New York
St. Louis
Denver
Kansas City

That's **** brutal. If neither squad is missing any key pieces (like KC missing Johnson or the Rams missing Jackson), I don't see us winning a game against those teams because they're simply a lot better.

way too early to tell, but the schedule is brutal.

we'll talk after the draft and we see how the Packers intend to fill some of their holes.

6 and 10 for the same reasons DB gave.

But then we will go back to having the easy schedule, our young guys will have one more year under their belts and TT will see it's now time to open the wallet and bring in a few key free agents. This was his plan all along and we will then win the division and be good for many years.

0-16, Favre gets destroyed in the first game trying to make up for having no NFL quality RB in the backfield.

Nah, they'll be around .500

Ruben Douglas wrote:0-16, Favre gets destroyed in the first game trying to make up for having no NFL quality RB in the backfield.

You must be worried as hell about the Bears, then. They've got no NFL quality RB and Rex Grossman.

13-3

The Packers win the Super Bowl. The hand of god raises the state of Wisconsin from the earth, and then drops it on Illinois.