4th round: Allen Barbe

eagle13 · Post #1 » by **eagle13** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:50 am

Will Patrickstill be there?

wichmae · Post #2 » by **wichmae** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:51 am

yes...

Post #3 » by **humanrefutation** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:52 am

We may still deal this pick for Randy Moss.

Fort Minor · Post #4 » by **Fort Minor** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:53 am

humanrefutation wrote:We may still deal this pick for Randy Moss.

I'm trying to remain optimistic. :nod:

Post #5 » by **humanrefutation** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:54 am

Mark May is an excellent analyst. He's usually right on.

eagle13 · Post #6 » by **eagle13** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:54 am

ESPN2 says Pats have pending conditional 08 picks based on performance (3rd maybe) on table. Possible 3rd team involved but if Pats are involved 3rd team won't be us.

Post #7 » by **humanrefutation** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:56 am

eagle13 wrote:ESPN2 says Pats have pending conditional 08 picks based on performance (3rd maybe) on table. Possible 3rd team involved but if Pats are involved 3rd team won't be us.

NE just landed Moss IMO.

Post #8 » by **humanrefutation** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:56 am

Oakland just got NE's third.

Fort Minor · Post #9 » by **Fort Minor** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:57 am

What a stubborn fossil TT is.

Post #10 » by **humanrefutation** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:58 am

If the NE-Oak trade is what I think it is, I'll be furious. It will ruin my perspective on this draft for now.

MartyConlonOnTheRun · Post #11 » by **MartyConlonOnTheRun** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:00 am

what 3rd are u guys talking about?

Fort Minor · Post #12 » by **Fort Minor** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:00 am

humanrefutation wrote:If the NE-Oak trade is what I think it is, I'll be furious. It will ruin my perspective on this draft for now.

Seriously...Moss or that absolutely ridiculous reach of a pick in Jones? I had begun to formulate a good opinion on TT. If this goes down, as the way the deal looks right now, he's back on the **** list.

Fort Minor · Post #13 » by **Fort Minor** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:00 am

MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:what 3rd are u guys talking about?

One of the compensary picks I think.

eagle13 · Post #14 » by **eagle13** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:01 am

Good night guys.

Hold down the fort tommorow. I'm gone.

Post #15 » by **humanrefutation** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:01 am

Maybe it isn't Moss...they haven't even brought it up yet.

MartyConlonOnTheRun · Post #16 » by **MartyConlonOnTheRun** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:02 am

thats weird, why wouldnt it say from NE

Fort Minor · Post #17 » by **Fort Minor** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:02 am

humanrefutation wrote:Maybe it isn't Moss...they haven't even brought it up yet.

Yeah that's a bit wierd. You'd think if it were Moss it'd get the "breaking news" treatment.

Post #18 » by **humanrefutation** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:03 am

Fort Minor wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Yeah that's a bit wierd. You'd think if it were Moss it'd get the "breaking news" treatment.

Maybe no information has been released yet about the details of the trade? Or maybe it WASN'T the Moss deal.

I'm hoping for the latter.

Thunder Muscle · Post #19 » by **Thunder Muscle** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:04 am

I haven't seen anything yet...?

MartyConlonOnTheRun · Post #20 » by **MartyConlonOnTheRun** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:04 am

so it was originally NE's pick for sure?