ImageImage

Moss officially a Patriot

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
deep throat
Banned User
Posts: 2,025
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 07, 2006

Moss officially a Patriot 

Post#1 » by deep throat » Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:57 pm

For a 4th round pick. He is in Boston to pass his physical. He redid his contract to make it work. Looks like he gets his Super Bowl.
Check out this site http://nflplaya.com/
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 15,544
And1: 1,237
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: WI
       

 

Post#2 » by Thunder Muscle » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:00 pm

User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#3 » by europa » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:00 pm

Remember when people were saying Brady didn't have anybody to throw to? Funny how he now has weapons coming out of his ass now.

Moss
Stallworth
Welker

With Caldwell and Watson plus Faulk out of the backfield.

It's funny watching so many teams bumble their way around and by contrast Belichick just keeps doing it the right way year after year.
Nothing will not break me.
BuckPack
Starter
Posts: 2,205
And1: 802
Joined: May 05, 2006
Location: NY

 

Post#4 » by BuckPack » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:03 pm

haven't been around much to discuss the picks, but not dealing for Moss and instead drafting Jones is infuriating.

I'm pretty shocked right now.
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 15,544
And1: 1,237
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: WI
       

 

Post#5 » by Thunder Muscle » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:07 pm

There must be something behind it. Maybe Moss wasn't warm to the idea of coming to play for the Pack. There are so many factors that I'm sure we are unaware of.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 106,626
And1: 41,225
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

 

Post#6 » by ReasonablySober » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:08 pm

I said it in another thread but a quick thread, but I'm surprised he went for a 4th (kudos to guys like BP who predicted it). I'm not surprised TT didn't get in out it. Moss doesn't make us a contender so adding him doesn't seem smart. Adding him to a team with loads of mature leaders that's got to be the early favorite for the Super Bowl makes all the sense in the world.
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 15,544
And1: 1,237
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: WI
       

 

Post#7 » by Thunder Muscle » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:11 pm

Its not like this Randy Moss circa 1999 either.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#8 » by europa » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:17 pm

N8Frog wrote:Its not like this Randy Moss circa 1999 either.


That's why I wasn't a huge advocate of trading for him. I don't think he's the Randy Moss he once was. That said, the low price tag lowered the risk substantially and there's no question his talent would have provided an upgrade at a clear position of need. And that would have helped the Packers improve which should be the goal for every season.

The key is whether he would have toed the line in Green Bay. He's been a team killer in two different places now but based on the rumors Favre seemed confident he would've been fine with the Packers. It's obvious Belichick believes he'll stay the course in New England.

There's a reason why the Patriots have been so good under Belichick and why other teams bumble about and go nowhere. This is yet another example in my opinion. When the opportunity presents itself for your team to improve you take it.
User avatar
Wise1
RealGM
Posts: 18,261
And1: 256
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Location: Devouring worlds.
     

 

Post#9 » by Wise1 » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:18 pm

Moss would have helped the Pack big time. No doubt about that. Too bad TT couldn't get this one done. I'm sure the Raiders would have rather shipped Moss to the NFC.

I suppose Moss preferred NE.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 106,626
And1: 41,225
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

 

Post#10 » by ReasonablySober » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:19 pm

europa wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



That's why I wasn't a huge advocate of trading for him. I don't think he's the Randy Moss he once was. That said, the low price tag lowered the risk substantially and there's no question his talent would have provided an upgrade at a clear position of need. And that would have helped the Packers improve which should be the goal for every season.

The key is whether he would have toed the line in Green Bay. He's been a team killer in two different places now but based on the rumors Favre seemed confident he would've been fine with the Packers. It's obvious Belichick believes he'll stay the course in New England.

There's a reason why the Patriots have been so good under Belichick and why other teams bumble about and go nowhere. This is yet another example in my opinion. When the opportunity presents itself for your team to improve you take it.


That really hasn't been their MO, however. For years they've let talent go to acquire draft picks. It's only now that they're on the cusp that they've gone crazy in trades and free agency.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,505
And1: 29,499
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

 

Post#11 » by paulpressey25 » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:23 pm

I can't criticize TT for this because we don't know what went on behind the scenes.....it's entirely possible that Harlan and some higher ups vetoed this because of negative fan reaction that might occur. Whether we all want it or not, there are a bunch of old-timer types who wouldn't want Moss wearing the green and gold and have voiced concern to the front office.

The other part is whether TT and the braintrust felt Moss would help or hurt Mike McCarthy. It's quite possible that Moss could ruin McCarthy if he got out of hand. That's a legitimate discussion topic and it's not worth having the team get torn apart which Moss has been known to do.

I have no problem with us not getting Moss. My bigger problem is the fact TT has really done nothing of note here this offseason, other than so far draft four guys that none of us have heard much of, and all have mixed grades from various scouts.
User avatar
DelaneyRudd
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 104,512
And1: 9,460
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
     

 

Post#12 » by DelaneyRudd » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:26 pm

I am fine either way. It definately would have been a calculated risk, that I have no problem with the team deciding it wasn't worth the headache.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#13 » by europa » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:27 pm

DrugBust wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



That really hasn't been their MO, however. For years they've let talent go to acquire draft picks. It's only now that they're on the cusp that they've gone crazy in trades and free agency.


His MO has been to make smart personnel moves and add the necessary talent. The team was lacking playmakers on offense last season and he didn't hesitate to address that area of need.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#14 » by europa » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:27 pm

Frankly, I would've rather had Darrell Jackson than Randy Moss. A fourth-round pick for DJax is a steal for the Niners.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
Wise1
RealGM
Posts: 18,261
And1: 256
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Location: Devouring worlds.
     

 

Post#15 » by Wise1 » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:30 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:I can't criticize TT for this because we don't know what went on behind the scenes.....it's entirely possible that Harlan and some higher ups vetoed this because of negative fan reaction that might occur. Whether we all want it or not, there are a bunch of old-timer types who wouldn't want Moss wearing the green and gold and have voiced concern to the front office.

The other part is whether TT and the braintrust felt Moss would help or hurt Mike McCarthy. It's quite possible that Moss could ruin McCarthy if he got out of hand. That's a legitimate discussion topic and it's not worth having the team get torn apart which Moss has been known to do.

I have no problem with us not getting Moss. My bigger problem is the fact TT has really done nothing of note here this offseason, other than so far draft four guys that none of us have heard much of, and all have mixed grades from various scouts.


I may have heard Mortenson say that Moss was willing to renegotiate his contract for the Pats but unwilling to do so for the Packers. That says to me that Moss prefered NE. I'm sure Oak would have given the opposing conference favored status if all other things were equal.
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 15,544
And1: 1,237
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: WI
       

 

Post#16 » by Thunder Muscle » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:31 pm

Maybe the X factor is Greg Jennings. Bringing Moss would knock him down to the 3rd WR and maybe the Pack feel he is going to make big strides this year.

I guess this can be analyzed from alot of angles. For better or for worse, it didn't happen. I've always been a believer in TT and I expect a competitive team in years to come.
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 15,544
And1: 1,237
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: WI
       

 

Post#17 » by Thunder Muscle » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:32 pm

Wise1 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I may have heard Mortenson say that Moss was willing to renegotiate his contract for the Pats but unwilling to do so for the Packers. That says to me that Moss prefered NE. I'm sure Oak would have given the opposing conference favored status if all other things were equal.


That makes sense.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,505
And1: 29,499
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

 

Post#18 » by paulpressey25 » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:34 pm

Wise1 wrote:-=I may have heard Mortenson say that Moss was willing to renegotiate his contract for the Pats but unwilling to do so for the Packers. That says to me that Moss prefered NE. I'm sure Oak would have given the opposing conference favored status if all other things were equal.


Good point...another thing behind the scenes we just don't know about....
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#19 » by europa » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:37 pm

And another reason why trading for Darrell Jackson may have made more sense.
Nothing will not break me.
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 15,544
And1: 1,237
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: WI
       

 

Post#20 » by Thunder Muscle » Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:39 pm

Its all good. The next big thing...

Image

Return to Green Bay Packers