ImageImage

Favre calls out management on not getting Randy

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,745
And1: 6,951
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Favre calls out management on not getting Randy 

Post#1 » by LUKE23 » Sun May 13, 2007 5:00 am

And he damn well should.

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=604780

Not going to have a happy Favre to start minicamp sounds like. I think his comments are legit though. 4th rounder? Give me a break. This was my biggest problem on draft day, the thing I was most mad about.
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,021
And1: 4,116
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

 

Post#2 » by DanoMac » Sun May 13, 2007 6:31 am

User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,675
And1: 27,265
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#3 » by trwi7 » Sun May 13, 2007 8:47 am

DannoMac20 wrote:http://greenbaypressgazette.packersnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070512/PKR01/70512050/1989

stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
th87
RealGM
Posts: 11,535
And1: 13,447
Joined: Dec 04, 2005

 

Post#4 » by th87 » Sun May 13, 2007 8:55 am

I nearly died when I saw "imbusal". Not to be mean or anything!

This basically confirms what most of us have been thinking all along. Ted set an offer, thinking the Patriots don't match it, and goes to sleep. The Patriots up the offer, and stubborn, rigid Ted doesn't budge, or doesn't even hear about it. Pathetic.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,675
And1: 27,265
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#5 » by trwi7 » Sun May 13, 2007 9:08 am

th87 wrote:I nearly died when I saw "imbusal". Not to be mean or anything!

This basically confirms what most of us have been thinking all along. Ted set an offer, thinking the Patriots don't match it, and goes to sleep. The Patriots up the offer, and stubborn, rigid Ted doesn't budge, or doesn't even hear about it. Pathetic.


Come on, does this man look stubborn or rigid?

Image

Oh wait. I guess he does.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
th87
RealGM
Posts: 11,535
And1: 13,447
Joined: Dec 04, 2005

 

Post#6 » by th87 » Sun May 13, 2007 9:13 am

And I have some fearless predictions:

I think our defense is going to be excellent this year. Harrell will do pretty well towards the end of the season, and the defense will propel us to a 9-7 record.

Our offense will be pretty good, but we'll be clamoring for a deep threat that would put us around 11-5. And we could've had that.
User avatar
th87
RealGM
Posts: 11,535
And1: 13,447
Joined: Dec 04, 2005

 

Post#7 » by th87 » Sun May 13, 2007 9:15 am

trwi7 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Come on, does this man look stubborn or rigid?

(picture)

Oh wait. I guess he does.


Haha. This is a CLASSIC example of why assistants should remain assistants. A total Terry Stotts syndrome.

Oh snap - I just realized that I can make fun of Terry Stotts here without ANY repercussions!!

Terry Stotts is a sucky head coach!
One of the worst we've had!
Look at the Warriors with a REAL coach!
Larry Krystkowiak is wayyyy better!
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,675
And1: 27,265
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#8 » by trwi7 » Sun May 13, 2007 9:35 am

Epicurus wrote:Terry Stotts is a sucky head coach!
One of the worst we've had!
Look at the Warriors with a REAL coach!
Larry Krystkowiak is wayyyy better!


Holy damn he finally admitted it! :D
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
th87
RealGM
Posts: 11,535
And1: 13,447
Joined: Dec 04, 2005

 

Post#9 » by th87 » Sun May 13, 2007 10:00 am

We should enjoy this freedom for a while, because I'm betting Epicurus' antenna should go off any minute.
User avatar
deep throat
Banned User
Posts: 2,025
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 07, 2006

 

Post#10 » by deep throat » Sun May 13, 2007 1:23 pm

I don't know if you saw it, but they asked Teddy about Favre wanting Moss. He looked real startled and said he had no input from Favre and didn't think that was an issue.

I wish Favre would have voiced something prior to the draft. He was very quiet, and if you are to believe Ted Favre had no dialogue with Ted regarding the acquisition of Moss. I kind of think that this came down more to M3 then it did Ted. I think that M3 was worried about having someone like Moss on the roster. Ted could have also been worried that this team wasn't going to be that good and Moss would dismantle some of the team unity and good character he has been trying to establish.

I too would have loved to see Moss in GB. You would have had the gun slinging strong armed QB and the still awfully fast 4.29 Moss. If nothing else, it would have been a very interesting year. Instead Ted reached for another possession type receiver in the 3rd and cntinued to rebuild while giving Favre the finger behind his back.
Check out this site http://nflplaya.com/
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,505
And1: 29,499
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

 

Post#11 » by paulpressey25 » Sun May 13, 2007 1:30 pm

th87 wrote:We should enjoy this freedom for a while, because I'm betting Epicurus' antenna should go off any minute.


I'm not sure he comes over to the Packer board....we can critique Stotts freely here..... :)

But since he hasn't been on the Bucks board lately, I'm sure he's visiting Terry in Europe and will be back to tell us about it in a week.

Back on topic.....if all it truly took was $3mm guaranteed and a fourth rounder, TT should have pulled the trigger.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,526
And1: 54,776
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

 

Post#12 » by MickeyDavis » Sun May 13, 2007 2:01 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



if all it truly took was $3mm guaranteed and a fourth rounder, TT should have pulled the trigger.
BuckPack
Starter
Posts: 2,205
And1: 802
Joined: May 05, 2006
Location: NY

Re: Favre calls out management on not getting Randy 

Post#13 » by BuckPack » Sun May 13, 2007 5:05 pm

LUKE23 wrote:And he damn well should.

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=604780

Not going to have a happy Favre to start minicamp sounds like. I think his comments are legit though. 4th rounder? Give me a break. This was my biggest problem on draft day, the thing I was most mad about.


Agreed. That was my reaction as well and I'm still livid about it. Ted did not have to sacrifice his long term rebuilding plan to acquire Moss, so I still see very little ardumnets against acquiring him.

Ted's biggest mistake at the helm of the Packers. And while I hate saying this, b/c I don't think one individual should ever be put above the team, he owed it to Favre to make an effort to acquire more playmakers for him. He didn't need to sacrifice his roster and this team's future, but a 4th round pick and 3 million is certainly justifiable.
User avatar
Neusch23
Head Coach
Posts: 7,250
And1: 59
Joined: Jul 04, 2005
Location: Green Bay
     

 

Post#14 » by Neusch23 » Sun May 13, 2007 5:07 pm

this is one of the largest mistakes I have seen by a GM. It isn't in the same league as Jerry Krause letting Jordan and Pip walk before they wanted to, but it is up there on the list of worst decisions made by a GM.

I am starting to want to get on the get rid of TT bandwagon.
User avatar
MikeIsGood
RealGM
Posts: 35,531
And1: 11,468
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Vamos Rafa
     

Re: Favre calls out management on not getting Randy 

Post#15 » by MikeIsGood » Sun May 13, 2007 5:41 pm

BuckPack wrote:Agreed. That was my reaction as well and I'm still livid about it. Ted did not have to sacrifice his long term rebuilding plan to acquire Moss, so I still see very little ardumnets against acquiring him.


B-I-N-G-O.

Why do I keep reading around here that TT is building for the future and he shouldn't be concerned with Brett? Moss was acquired for a freaking 4th round pick. That is not sacrificing your future plans. It's more like getting the best of both worlds. He easily could have acquired Moss while still otherwise building for the future instead of now. He still could have taken Harrell (and been more justified doing so IMO, even though I'm alright with the pick), Jackson, etc.

There's nothing wrong with building for the future, but still giving your QB something to work with now. It's not like you're sacrificing a 1st-rounder or anything. It's sad - that would have probably been the best receiving core Favre had ever had to work with in his career, at the tender old age of 37.
User avatar
DelaneyRudd
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 104,512
And1: 9,460
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
     

 

Post#16 » by DelaneyRudd » Sun May 13, 2007 5:50 pm

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18642417/

This will all blow over, and the Packers will be a surprise team. Jennings will step up and be a reliable 1st option. Franks will rebound. The real problem is at RB.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,675
And1: 27,265
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#17 » by trwi7 » Sun May 13, 2007 5:56 pm

DelaneyRudd wrote:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18642417/

This will all blow over, and the Packers will be a surprise team. Jennings will step up and be a reliable 1st option. Franks will rebound. The real problem is at RB.


I really wish I could be optimistic about this team but I don't see anymore than 6 or 7 wins this year.

Thanks Ted, **** dumbass **stands up and gives normal deer in the headlights look in my direction**
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Flames24Rulz
Head Coach
Posts: 6,406
And1: 343
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
       

 

Post#18 » by Flames24Rulz » Sun May 13, 2007 5:57 pm

Thompson is a complete dumbass. If we got Moss and a manageable RB, this could very well have been a team that could've contended with the division. Instead, the idiot is still stuck in rebuild mode.

I agree with Brett and I know 99.9% of Packers fans will agree with Brett. Thompson needs to go. Now.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,505
And1: 29,499
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

 

Post#19 » by paulpressey25 » Sun May 13, 2007 7:18 pm

This is classic management technique here. TT and MM didn't want Moss....didn't want to deal with the headaches....didn't want him around the young players.

Now they can't come out and tell their star guy Favre that, since he wants Moss. So TT pretends to be interested.....would take Moss only if he comes for free with no guaranteed money, that way if he's an ass in training camp, he's gone. In the meantime, the plan is to really just let Moss end up on another team, but make Favre think they tried.

The problem is that they did such a half-ass job of it, and Moss ended up going so cheap that they got caught in their own game and Favre called them on it.
User avatar
deep throat
Banned User
Posts: 2,025
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 07, 2006

 

Post#20 » by deep throat » Sun May 13, 2007 7:24 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:This is classic management technique here. TT and MM didn't want Moss....didn't want to deal with the headaches....didn't want him around the young players.

Now they can't come out and tell their star guy Favre that, since he wants Moss. So TT pretends to be interested.....would take Moss only if he comes for free with no guaranteed money, that way if he's an ass in training camp, he's gone. In the meantime, the plan is to really just let Moss end up on another team, but make Favre think they tried.

The problem is that they did such a half-ass job of it, and Moss ended up going so cheap that they got caught in their own game and Favre called them on it.


I think your 100% on the money. I think M3 played abigger role then people think. He is a young inexperienced Head Coach and the propsect of dealing with a guy like Moss if the team started to lose probably was enough to blck the deal.
Check out this site http://nflplaya.com/

Return to Green Bay Packers