MadCityBucky wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Agreed. Just like you blitz rookie QB's, you should blitz a backup QB. Especially if they're not very good. Force them to make quick throws and create opportunities for interceptions.
We put quite a bit of pressure on the Eagles and their very good line without having to blitz alot.The Giants line isn't as good and i wouldn't blitz that much unless the front four can't create some havoc.
1.Blitzing does open up the chance for allowing a big play or two.Given the Packers aren't an explosive offense,make the Giants with a rookie QB and unproven RB try to put together 7-8-9-10-11 play drives without stalling out or turning it over vs maybe getting caught in a blitz or two that leads to a cheap long TD or more.
2.More guys back in coverage makes a rookie QB have to be very precise and has more defenders back to pick off a pass.
I'm not saying to never blitz,but i wouldn't get silly by doing it to often or by sending multiple blitzers on given plays which could lead to getting burned.Try to confuse him with a few zone blitzes and/or sending an extra guy here and there,but our front four should be good enough to not force us to take to many risky chances.Get burned in a blitz and give up say a 65 yard bomb and maybe one bad turnover by us,suddenly their crowd is in a frenzy and our offense is out of their comfort zone.
Preventing the big play was as big a reason as any as to why GB won the game vs the Eagles.