ImageImage

Wynn needs to start over Jackson

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,750
And1: 6,956
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Wynn needs to start over Jackson 

Post#1 » by LUKE23 » Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:07 pm

Or at least until Morency is up to full strength. He hits the hole quicker, has more power behind him, and it appears he has just as much open field speed. Been much more impressed with Wynn than BJax.
User avatar
Ill-yasova
RealGM
Posts: 13,361
And1: 2,562
Joined: Jul 13, 2006

 

Post#2 » by Ill-yasova » Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:19 pm

Jackson seems hesitant. I agree for the time being.
User avatar
ClassicJack
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,805
And1: 968
Joined: Nov 24, 2005
     

 

Post#3 » by ClassicJack » Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:23 pm

I agree too. I just don't get Jackson. He doesn't run particularly hard, he doesn't make people miss, can't block, drops passes.....I just don't get it. :dontknow:
F*** Marc Davis, f*** Tim Donaghy and f*** David Stern as a staff, record label and as a mothaf**kin crew......and if you wanna be down with Stern then F*** YOU TOO!!! Stu Jackson f*** you too.....all you mothaf**kas F*** YOU TOO!!!!
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

 

Post#4 » by El Duderino » Sun Sep 16, 2007 11:15 pm

We've played six games now and i'm still waiting for a single moment to happen where i can say,so this is why we drafted Jackson.I know the run blocking has been horrid,but good backs at times create plays on their own.

You would think that out of all the carries Jackson has had so far in six games,at least a few times he'd have shown some great burst and/or some great wiggle to make a guy or two miss.

So far at least,he's shown more the skills of a 6th-7th round pick,not second rounder.
Johnny Newman
Banned User
Posts: 2,928
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 08, 2005
Location: Milwaukee,WI.

 

Post#5 » by Johnny Newman » Sun Sep 16, 2007 11:28 pm

Dont forget Grants one carry but ended in a sweet spin move!
User avatar
DigitalFool
Veteran
Posts: 2,573
And1: 152
Joined: Jul 13, 2006

 

Post#6 » by DigitalFool » Sun Sep 16, 2007 11:51 pm

I like Wynn as a change of pace back - I just don't know if Jackson brings anything to the table. If we keep a three back rotation, we would at least keep them fresh and keep defenses from planning as much on a key focus back...
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,593
And1: 54,822
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

 

Post#7 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Sep 17, 2007 12:39 am

Wynn had one nice run. Before that he had 12 yards on 9 carries.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,049
And1: 14,927
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

 

Post#8 » by Ayt » Mon Sep 17, 2007 12:45 am

Our horrible run blocking is more important to me than who starts. That said, Wynn looked very good on his short TD run and he showed off some impressive ability on the long run.
jligon
Sophomore
Posts: 224
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 10, 2007

 

Post#9 » by jligon » Mon Sep 17, 2007 4:17 am

MickeyDavis wrote:Wynn had one nice run. Before that he had 12 yards on 9 carries.

I was going to point out the same thing. But actually he had at least two good runs and I'm thinking there might have been a third (or that could have been a move on a pass play that I'm thinking of). However, he got dumped at least twice deep in the back field for 5+ yard losses or more, therefore the 9 rushes for only 12 yards.

I don't think either of them looked horrible today and we did seem to establish at least the possible threat that we'd run. I'm not sure I'm a fan of the way Brett telegraphs the run by holding the ball out immediately. They did a good job of keeping the Giants off balance today but there were those couple runs where their lineman got to our back untouched.
User avatar
DH34Phan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,627
And1: 114
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Contact:

 

Post#10 » by DH34Phan » Mon Sep 17, 2007 4:53 am

As long as we are winning, I am fine with Wynn and Jackson learning as we go.

They are struggling now, but with more game experience I think both will be fine.
Flames24Rulz
Head Coach
Posts: 6,406
And1: 343
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
       

 

Post#11 » by Flames24Rulz » Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:37 am

Once Morency comes back, our running game should (hopefully) begin to take off.

I like Wynn a lot. I was a big fan of the pick and was real happy he made the team. But like others have said, I think he's a good change-of-pace back, not an every down back.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,593
And1: 54,822
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

 

Post#12 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Sep 17, 2007 1:10 pm

Our blocking has to get better before any of our backs look good. I wouldn't be surprised to see Wynn get the start Sunday .

Return to Green Bay Packers