Page 1 of 1

Blurb in Simmons Power Rankings

Posted: Fri Oct 5, 2007 4:18 pm
by ReasonablySober
Reading Bill has become the equivalent of some weird, painful S&M thing for me. It's painful in a way that I simply have to experience. I can't stand Boston fans. They can throw me into a blind rage like few things have. Bill **** Simmons is one of the biggest homers of them all and the son of a bitch writes an entertaining column every week.

The fact that he's found a way to draw a parallel that I can't completely discount between his Celtics and my Packers is driving my nuts. But like I said, I can't argue with it:

4. Green Bay
During Larry Bird's last two years on the Celtics, when his back was killing him and he was just about cooked, Dee Brown and Brian Shaw showed up, Reggie Lewis was coming into his own, Kevin McHale and Robert Parish were healthy again, Eddie Pinckney was emerging off the bench ... suddenly, they were playing fast-break basketball and Bird's game was completely rejuvenated in the process. The most fascinating dynamic? The respect the young guys held for Bird, Parish and McHale -- because of that respect, the youngsters followed instructions, never took a game off and never stopped busting their butts. You could see the reverence they had for the older guys, just like you could see how much the old guys loved playing with them. Even though they never made the Finals because Bird kept getting hurt, those were meaningful seasons for everyone who cared about the Celtics. Like two generations colliding. Everyone had the right level of urgency, as well as the proper level of appreciation for what was happening.

We're seeing the same thing happen with Favre and the Packers right now. It's not that "he's having fun" and "he's managing the game" and all the crap that the talking heads are spewing. This goes deeper -- it's about a seemingly washed-up superstar who landed in the right situation, realizes it, appreciates it, embraces it and, invariably, his skills regenerated and his team reinvigorated itself in the process. Everyone keeps mentioning how much fun Favre is having; nobody is mentioning his teammates. Each guy looks happier than the next, and if you think these guys aren't killing themselves to make sure Favre succeeds, you're crazy. (NFL Films caught a great moment before the Vikings game when each of his receivers was talking about how much he wanted to catch No. 421.) Most of them are young enough to remember watching Favre in his prime, and most of them are smart enough to appreciate that they've become part of something that's bigger than just a typical 4-0 season. Throw in Lambeau and it's the most amazing sports story in awhile. I just wish the Packers had a running game. Or even the mirage of a running game.


Can you imagine what people would say if all of the sudden we get one or two of those fluke 100 yard games from one of our runningbacks?

Posted: Fri Oct 5, 2007 6:53 pm
by Neusch23
I am surpised every time I see a poster here say we are fine with our current crew of RB's, when everyone else in the country is stating how bad we need a running game...

Posted: Fri Oct 5, 2007 7:04 pm
by ReasonablySober
Neusch23 wrote:I am surpised every time I see a poster here say we are fine with our current crew of RB's, when everyone else in the country is stating how bad we need a running game...


I don't know if we're fine at RB.

What I do know is that it's hard to run behind a line that isn't opening up any holes. There isn't a RB available that could help us considering how poorly the line is run blocking.

We're just going to have to wait until the offseason when free agency and the draft starts.

Posted: Fri Oct 5, 2007 7:14 pm
by MickeyDavis
There is a huge amount of respect for Favre among the youngsters on the team. But the receivers each wanted to catch 421 so they can cash in. Jennings is doing it already :)

Posted: Fri Oct 5, 2007 7:19 pm
by NeedsMoreCheese
MickeyDavis wrote:There is a huge amount of respect for Favre among the youngsters on the team. But the receivers each wanted to catch 421 so they can cash in. Jennings is doing it already :)


I heard that Donald Lee didnt want it though. Because he really wanted to keep his first TD ball.

Posted: Fri Oct 5, 2007 8:03 pm
by Nash13/Marion31
[quote="Kohl Is A Mome"]-= original quote snipped =-



I heard that Donald Lee didnt want it though. Because he really wanted to keep his first TD ball.[/quote]

I think you are talking about JJones, not Lee. If i'm not mistaken it was Jones that didn't want to catch the 421.

Posted: Fri Oct 5, 2007 8:18 pm
by El Duderino
I also hate all Boston teams and fans,but Simmons is the one writer i always make a point to read.

As for the bad running game,i think it's mostly from poor blocking,but the backs are partly to blame also.High quality running backs can find ways to get yards sometimes when obvious holes aren't there.

Posted: Fri Oct 5, 2007 9:59 pm
by smacks1
Nash13/Marion31 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I think you are talking about JJones, not Lee. If i'm not mistaken it was Jones that didn't want to catch the 421.


That would make more sense because Lee has already caught a few TD's

Posted: Fri Oct 5, 2007 10:42 pm
by NeedsMoreCheese
smacks1 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



That would make more sense because Lee has already caught a few TD's


Thats true. I never really looked into it, its what my mom had mentioned to me on sunday.

Posted: Sat Oct 6, 2007 1:34 am
by NeedsMoreCheese
For some reason i really liked this part of the article too
(Random question on the Travis Henry thing: I thought pot killed sperm cells? How many kids would this guy have sired if he wasn't a fan of the Mary Jane? Twenty? Thirty? And did you ever think the same person could potentially shatter Shawn Kemp's fertility records and Ricky Williams' drug test records? Put it this way: You are making a STRONG statement when you purchase a Henry jersey right now. You're basically saying, "I love pot, I love sex, and your dad would have a heart attack if he knew I was dating you.")

Posted: Sat Oct 6, 2007 7:16 am
by Bucks_Revenge
DrugBust wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I don't know if we're fine at RB.

What I do know is that it's hard to run behind a line that isn't opening up any holes. There isn't a RB available that could help us considering how poorly the line is run blocking.

We're just going to have to wait until the offseason when free agency and the draft starts.



I agree I dont care how bad of running backs a team may have...there has to be a point in a game where the line allows the back get a big gain, and for some reason our line has not let that happen....and if Favre was human they would of allowed a nfl high in sacks so far.