Skins @ Seahawks Game Thread
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Skins @ Seahawks Game Thread
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,762
- And1: 6,963
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Skins @ Seahawks Game Thread
Go Skins!!!
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 103,094
- And1: 55,633
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
- rilamann
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,700
- And1: 15,232
- Joined: Jun 20, 2003
- Location: Damn that rilamann!!
-
Yea MD the Skins are lucky to only be down 0-7,the Skins defense hasnt played well so far (bad tackling) and the Skins have been pinned deep twice.Its odd because I watched the last 2 Skins games and the Skins defense has been great.
Hopefully the Skins can get it together and if and when they do they arent down big.
This game is huge for the Packers in my opinion for two reasons.
1.Skins have a much better chance in my opinion of beating the Cowboys than the Giants or Bucs do.
2.Out of the Bucks Ginats & Seahawks the Seahawks scare me the most as far as the Packers next opponet.
If the Skins win this game I think the Pack will have a fairly easy time with the Giants or Bucs then host the NFC Championship at Lambeau vs the Skins.I think the Skins have the Cowboys numbers plus their rivalry factor is big.
If the Hawks win I think the Packers will have a tough game vs the Hawks next week then have to go to Dallas if they beat the Hawks.
Go Skins.
Hopefully the Skins can get it together and if and when they do they arent down big.
This game is huge for the Packers in my opinion for two reasons.
1.Skins have a much better chance in my opinion of beating the Cowboys than the Giants or Bucs do.
2.Out of the Bucks Ginats & Seahawks the Seahawks scare me the most as far as the Packers next opponet.
If the Skins win this game I think the Pack will have a fairly easy time with the Giants or Bucs then host the NFC Championship at Lambeau vs the Skins.I think the Skins have the Cowboys numbers plus their rivalry factor is big.
If the Hawks win I think the Packers will have a tough game vs the Hawks next week then have to go to Dallas if they beat the Hawks.
Go Skins.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
- rilamann
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,700
- And1: 15,232
- Joined: Jun 20, 2003
- Location: Damn that rilamann!!
-
The sense I get from this game is that in order for the Skins to win they are going to need a big turnover to Spring ( pun intended) the game in their favor.
Skins D isnt playing good and they can't get anything realy going on offense.
Come on Skins.
Skins D isnt playing good and they can't get anything realy going on offense.
Come on Skins.

Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
- MadCityBucky
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,873
- And1: 11
- Joined: Jun 21, 2007
- rilamann
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,700
- And1: 15,232
- Joined: Jun 20, 2003
- Location: Damn that rilamann!!
-
The more I see the Seahawks in this game the less I fear the Packers playing them.
Reason being is the fact the Skins have no bussiness only being down 0-10 right now.If the Seahawks where a big bad team or a legit contender the score should be something like 24-0 at least right now.
If they can't put away a Redskin team at home that maybe just played their worst half of football all season it doesnt bode well for them when come to Lambeau.
The Hawks have a nice D-line but the Skins are making them look like they'd **** on the '85 Bears D-line.
Reason being is the fact the Skins have no bussiness only being down 0-10 right now.If the Seahawks where a big bad team or a legit contender the score should be something like 24-0 at least right now.
If they can't put away a Redskin team at home that maybe just played their worst half of football all season it doesnt bode well for them when come to Lambeau.
The Hawks have a nice D-line but the Skins are making them look like they'd **** on the '85 Bears D-line.

Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
- rilamann
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,700
- And1: 15,232
- Joined: Jun 20, 2003
- Location: Damn that rilamann!!
-
LUKE23 wrote:I don't think Seattle is a good matchup for us. They get a ton of heat on the QB and have a fast, fast defense. They can run and pass the ball.
I'd MUCH MUCH rather play Bucs or Giants.
I agree totally the Hawks are a tough match up for us then on top of that you got the Holmgren vs Favre factor.
Its going to be a tough game for the Packers no doubt about it.
With that said though based on what i've seen from Seattle this season and in this game I just don't think Seattle has what it takes to beat a 13-3 Packer team at Lambeau field.
Seattle does have a good D but keep in mind the Skins terrible offense is making them look a lot better than they realy are.
Its going to be a totally different ball game for Seattle in Green Bay with Favre and his cast of top notch recivers.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
- rilamann
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,700
- And1: 15,232
- Joined: Jun 20, 2003
- Location: Damn that rilamann!!
-
LUKE23 wrote:I don't think Seattle is a good matchup for us. They get a ton of heat on the QB and have a fast, fast defense. They can run and pass the ball.
I'd MUCH MUCH rather play Bucs or Giants.
I agree totally the Hawks are a tough match up for us then on top of that you got the Holmgren vs Favre factor.
Its going to be a tough game for the Packers no doubt about it.
With that said though based on what i've seen from Seattle this season and in this game I just don't think Seattle has what it takes to beat a 13-3 Packer team at Lambeau field.
Seattle does have a good D but keep in mind the Skins terrible offense is making them look a lot better than they realy are.
Its going to be a totally different ball game for Seattle in Green Bay with Favre and his cast of top notch recivers.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
- MadCityBucky
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,873
- And1: 11
- Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Absolutely no running game for the Hawks and with Hasselback getting banged up I like the Packers chances though Holgrem is a very good coach and should have the Hawks ready.
The Hawks D has a lot of speed, don't know why they haven't played well defensively this season.
I'd much rather play the Bucs/Giants though.
The Hawks D has a lot of speed, don't know why they haven't played well defensively this season.
I'd much rather play the Bucs/Giants though.
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,762
- And1: 6,963
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
MadCityBucky wrote:Absolutely no running game for the Hawks and with Hasselback getting banged up I like the Packers chances though Holgrem is a very good coach and should have the Hawks ready.
The Hawks D has a lot of speed, don't know why they haven't played well defensively this season.
I'd much rather play the Bucs/Giants though.
Seahawks were a top ranked D pretty much all year. Top 5 or better I believe.
- MadCityBucky
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,873
- And1: 11
- Joined: Jun 21, 2007
LUKE23 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Seahawks were a top ranked D pretty much all year. Top 5 or better I believe.
7th ranked defense PPG wise.
Definetely more of a run stopping group with a great defensive line lead by Patrick Kerney.
As for their secondary, I like Marcus Trufant but am not sure about the rest of the group.
- MadCityBucky
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,873
- And1: 11
- Joined: Jun 21, 2007