Thoughts on wussifying football?
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 5:54 am
I had ESPN on earlier today and Lawrence Taylor was pimping his video game and the subject of todays football came up briefly, which Taylor said was soft because of all the penalties/fines for hard hits or things like horse collar tackles. The guy talking to LT said it's done to lessen injuries to which Taylor said, it's part of the game and if players don't like that, they should take up tennis.
With all the rules now that nearly makes hitting any QB hard a penalty and/or fine or many other hard hits/blocks doing the same, i think it's getting ridiculous. Hines Ward got a couple fines for what i thought were perfectly legal blocks. I thought the hit on Boldin that knocked him out was a totally clean hit, yet the league suspends Smith for a game and fines him 50 grand..
Guys like Smith in the secondary IMO get shafted all the time. You have safeties closing on receivers at a high rate of speed and so often at the last second, the receiver ducks or changes his body angle which leads to head to head collisions. How is a DB that is running fast supposed to know whether a receiver will duck or change their body angle at the last split second? Does the league think these defenders can stop time so that they can see ahead of time what the receiver will do with his body at that last second? When blocking a guy who doesn't see the block coming, are the guys supposed slow up and do it all swell and nice now? Are we far away from quarterbacks having an X sewed on the front/back of their jersey and if they are touched anywhere else, it's roughing the passer and a fine?
I understand that athletes are much bigger and faster than in the past so collisions can cause more harm. That said, it's getting to where nearly any huge hit ends up drawing a fine and every Sunday around the league there are a couple silly roughing the passer calls on plays where little to nothing dangerous happened. I can see why so many defensive players get frustrated because the league clearly benefits from the violent and physical nature of the game,yet if any player stays on the ground after a big hit, it's more likely than not going to draw a hefty fine even though the play wasn't a penalty.
With all the rules now that nearly makes hitting any QB hard a penalty and/or fine or many other hard hits/blocks doing the same, i think it's getting ridiculous. Hines Ward got a couple fines for what i thought were perfectly legal blocks. I thought the hit on Boldin that knocked him out was a totally clean hit, yet the league suspends Smith for a game and fines him 50 grand..
Guys like Smith in the secondary IMO get shafted all the time. You have safeties closing on receivers at a high rate of speed and so often at the last second, the receiver ducks or changes his body angle which leads to head to head collisions. How is a DB that is running fast supposed to know whether a receiver will duck or change their body angle at the last split second? Does the league think these defenders can stop time so that they can see ahead of time what the receiver will do with his body at that last second? When blocking a guy who doesn't see the block coming, are the guys supposed slow up and do it all swell and nice now? Are we far away from quarterbacks having an X sewed on the front/back of their jersey and if they are touched anywhere else, it's roughing the passer and a fine?
I understand that athletes are much bigger and faster than in the past so collisions can cause more harm. That said, it's getting to where nearly any huge hit ends up drawing a fine and every Sunday around the league there are a couple silly roughing the passer calls on plays where little to nothing dangerous happened. I can see why so many defensive players get frustrated because the league clearly benefits from the violent and physical nature of the game,yet if any player stays on the ground after a big hit, it's more likely than not going to draw a hefty fine even though the play wasn't a penalty.