RealGM

Just got done watching the Jets game. Seems like all he knows how to do is win(besides INTs, oh yeah and TDs). Looks like we made a mistake. How many of you cats that tongue kiss Teddy boy diggin this year? 1 losing season in 17 years, of which came under the supervision of ol Teddy boy. Oh yeah tell me how we over achieved last year, cause that really helps your boy's cause. Considering if you take away last years record those two dipsh*ts(TT & MM) got nothing.

Why am I not surprised. A Favre fan coming to the Packers board to diss the Packers. And when the Packers were healthy and 4-3, Whereas the Jets were struggling and had just lost to the freaking Raiders, with everyone calling for Favre's head, nothing to be heard from them.

Really? That's your comeback? Cause I've been around. And I'm a Packer fan. If I wasn't a Packer fan I wouldn't give two sh*ts about letting Favre go. So tell me how great of a decision it was again.

What is the point? If the Packers were 7-3 you wouldn't be making this post.

I imagine our record would be better if we played the Chiefs, Bengals, and Rams at home too.

Must be pretty easy to win when your opponents to date have a winning percentage of about .40. Those games against the Bengals, Raiders, Rams and Chiefs sure were tough. And their upcoming games against San Francisco and Seattle are brutal.

I'm glad we got rid of him. The team needed to move on.

I don't visit this board much anymore, but I sure thought it'd be over this. But I guess there has to be a few.

No one needs to make a "comeback" to your argument because it doesn't deserve one.

Once again, as is my response to pretty much any Brett Favre post/article/blog these days - 'yawn.'

Captain Erv wrote:What is the point? If the Packers were 7-3 you wouldn't be making this post.

I imagine our record would be better if we played the Chiefs, Bengals, and Rams at home too.

The Packers are not 7-3 that's my point. Not sure who are these unstoppable teams that we beat. I mean there really isn't that many great teams. Do you want the Jets to go back and play the 90's Cowboys or something like that.

th87 wrote:Favre certainly had an amazing game, and he definitely still has the skills to succeed. And it's certainly possible that the Packers would've had a better record with him. However, the move was made for the future and is a more prudent one for that very reason. And he shouldn't have retired in the first place. Rodgers is the future and needs to be allowed time to grow. But this game does make me wonder how Favre would've done on the Packers this season.

The thing is trading Favre isn't even the worse move that Ted has made. We keep talking bout the future, but it sounds more like magic beans to me.

The whole Favre thing has been rehashed here 1000 times. It's time to move on. I was in favor of bringing him back. But we're 9 games into the season. He's a Jet and can be discussed on the Jets board if need be.