ImageImage

Sources: Nolan likely to run defense

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

Captain Erv
General Manager
Posts: 8,119
And1: 78
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Contact:
     

Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#1 » by Captain Erv » Wed Jan 7, 2009 6:38 pm

January 6, 2009

Nolan likely choice for defensive coordinator, sources say

By Pete Dougherty
pdougher@greenbaypressgazette.com

Mike Nolan has emerged as the clear front-runner to become the Green Bay Packers’ next defensive coordinator.

Two NFL sources said Tuesday that coach Mike McCarthy appears likely to bring in Nolan to replace Bob Sanders, whose firing was announced Monday. One source said word at the Cactus Bowl, the all-star game for Division II seniors in Kingsville, Texas, is the move is all but done. Another said there appeared to be at least a 90 percent chance Nolan will join the Packers.

Nolan, who was fired as San Francisco’s head coach seven games into this season, has 11 years of experience as a defensive coordinator in the NFL with Baltimore (2002-04), the New York Jets (2000), Washington (1997-99) and the New York Giants (1993-96). As a head coach, Nolan had some problems with players on the offensive side of the ball, but as a defensive coordinator, he has a reputation for being a high-energy, optimistic leader whom players like.

“I think he’s a good coach,” said a scout familiar with Nolan. “Sometimes he was a little strong and butted heads with those guys (on San Francisco’s offense), but as a smart guy and likable and all that, he’s all that.”

Nolan, 49, looked like a strong candidate for the job from the start because of his ties to McCarthy. When Nolan became San Francisco’s head coach in 2005, he hired McCarthy as offensive coordinator, and the two by all accounts worked well their one season together before McCarthy became the Packers’ head coach in 2006.

Nolan’s 11 years as NFL defensive coordinator is a major selling point if McCarthy is reluctant to bring in a first-time defensive coordinator now that his program with the Packers is entering its fourth season. Nolan is a known quantity in the job, whereas another of McCarthy’s possible candidates, Winston Moss, never has been a defensive coordinator. Moss, who is McCarthy’s assistant head coach and linebackers coach, was the only defensive position coach McCarthy retained Monday when he fired Sanders and four other defensive assistants Monday. Moss also has interviewed for the St. Louis Rams’ head-coaching vacancy.

Nolan is one of several respected defensive coordinators available this offseason, along with Gregg Williams, who wasn’t retained by Jacksonville because of philosophical differences with coach Jack Del Rio; Romeo Crennel, who was fired as Cleveland’s coach last week; Jim Haslett, who finished this season as St. Louis’ interim coach; and Eric Mangini, who was fired as the New York Jets’ coach last week, though he appears to be the top candidate to become Cleveland’s next head coach.

There also are some up-and-coming NFL assistants who could be candidates for their first job as a defensive coordinator, though again McCarthy appears to think he’s too far into his tenure to take such a risk. Among the top prospects are Sean McDermott, Philadelphia’s secondary coach; Keith Butler, Pittsburgh’s linebackers coach; Pepper Johnson, New England’s defensive line coach; and Bill Sheridan, the New York Giants’ linebackers coach.

Nolan also has appeal because though he prefers to run a 3-4 defense, he’s also worked in the 4-3 and mixed that in extensively as coach of the 49ers. In his first season with San Francisco, the 49ers ran mostly a 4-3 and gradually evolved into primarily a 3-4 defense over his three-plus seasons with the team. McCarthy also might prefer a slower transition to the 3-4, because the Packers’ roster is built to play a 4-3, and switching to primarily a 3-4 in one offseason could be difficult and require major changes in personnel.

“He’s good now. He’s smart,” said the scout who’s familiar with Nolan. “He can run 3-4, 4-3, he knows it all. It depends on what personnel you have. He’ll do whatever, morph to whatever. He’ll use your players to their strengths. He’s smart that way.”

Nolan has had some ups and downs as a defensive coordinator in the NFL but became the 49ers’ head coach largely on the strength of his performance as Baltimore’s defensive coordinator from 2002 to 2004. In his first season, he took over a Ravens defense gutted by a roster purge, and it finished only No. 22 in yards allowed and No. 19 in points allowed. But his defense finished No. 3 in yards and No. 6 in points in ’03, and Nos. 6 in both in ’04.

Before that, Nolan had the difficult job of replacing Bill Belichick as the New York Jets’ defensive coordinator in 2000. He essentially ran Belichick’s version of the 3-4 and improved the Jets ranking in yards allowed from the previous season (No. 21 in ’99 to No. 11 in 2000) and dropped slightly in points allowed (from No. 9 in ’99 to No. 13 in ’00). That offseason, though, Jets coach Al Groh left to become head coach at Virginia, and new coach Herm Edwards fired Nolan and most of the rest of the coaching staff.

Nolan’s most controversial stint as defensive coordinator, though, came with Washington from 1997 through 1999, after four generally successful seasons as the Giants’ defensive coordinator pegged him as a future head coach. Nolan’s first two seasons with Washington produced a solid performance in ’97, when his defense ranked No. 16 in yards allowed and No. 8 in points, and a bad year in ’98, when it ranked Nos. 24 and 28 respectively.

Then in 1999, brash neophyte Daniel Snyder purchased the team, and when Nolan’s defense struggled — it finished the season ranked No. 30 in yards and No. 24 in points — Snyder went after his defensive coordinator. The first-year NFL owner considered Nolan’s defenses vanilla, twice had ice cream delivered to Nolan’s office to hammer home the point, and after the 10-6 season, fired Nolan.

Nolan caught on as Baltimore’s receivers coach in ’01 — the only season he’s coached offense — then became defensive coordinator in 2002. The Ravens had won the Super Bowl in the 2000 season with one of the best defenses in NFL history, finished 10-6 in 2001, then had a roster makeover because salary-cap and age issues. Among the players the Ravens lost going into 2002 were defensive tackle duo Sam Adams and Tony Siragusa, linebacker Jamie Sharper, safety Rod Woodson, defensive end Rob Burnett and cornerback Duane Starks. Nolan’s defense finished that season No. 22 in yards allowed and No. 19 in points allowed, before finishing in the top six in both categories the next two years.


Doesn't exactly have ringing endorsements across the board, but it is definitely something different.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,843
And1: 42,152
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#2 » by ReasonablySober » Wed Jan 7, 2009 8:12 pm

You can't make chicken salad out of chicken ****. That 49ers team had crap for talent outside of Willis. They blew their load on high priced free agents and each of them has been a disappointment. They also didn't help themselves in the draft over the last couple seasons. Manny Lawson was the Aaron Maybin of this draft: tall, slender and fast but not built to play standing up. Maybin isn't a 3-4 OLB and neither was/is Lawson. Kentwan Balmer is a 3-4 DE, not a DT. Just like the Packers blew it by passing on Ngata, so did the 49ers. Their mistake was even more egregious considering they absolutely needed a guy like him in the middle. They needed a pass rusher and let Lamar Woodley go by in 2007. Groves would have been a good option in 2008.

It's like they actively tried to add the worst possible players to their defense.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,762
And1: 6,963
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#3 » by LUKE23 » Wed Jan 7, 2009 9:01 pm

I forgot that we passed on Ngata in the Hawk draft. Looking back, yeah, might want to do that one over.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,119
And1: 55,662
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#4 » by MickeyDavis » Wed Jan 7, 2009 9:23 pm

Get Jenkins, Barnett and Bigby back healthy. Draft a DLineman or two. Maybe pick one up in FA. Nolan will look good. Trot the same guys out there that we did in December 2008 and Nolan will look like crap.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#5 » by El Duderino » Wed Jan 7, 2009 9:28 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:Get Jenkins, Barnett and Bigby back healthy. Draft a DLineman or two. Maybe pick one up in FA. Nolan will look good. Trot the same guys out there that we did in December 2008 and Nolan will look like crap.


That's about it

Sean McDermott from Philly was one guy that sounded like a very intriguing guy to consider, but i think Nolan appeals to McCarthy because they've worked together before.
User avatar
notoriousTJ11
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,362
And1: 3
Joined: Jun 08, 2003
Location: Morrison Hotel

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#6 » by notoriousTJ11 » Thu Jan 8, 2009 2:29 pm

New JS article now saying Williams has a shot ... should be interesting
User avatar
Simulack
RealGM
Posts: 11,300
And1: 4
Joined: Jan 03, 2002

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#7 » by Simulack » Thu Jan 8, 2009 4:04 pm

Although I'm fine with Nolan, I'd be even more happy if we hired Gregg Williams. Either of these guys will be an upgrade and with some some high draft picks and money to spend in free agency, TT has a shot to turn around this defense very quickly.
bucks59
Senior
Posts: 646
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 15, 2006
Contact:

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#8 » by bucks59 » Thu Jan 8, 2009 5:17 pm

I personally would prefer someone from the Eagles organization. Their defense is very aggressive, with unique blitz schemes. They have also had assistants that have had success in other organizations. I think everyone would agree that the biggest problem with the Packers defense is that it was soft and predictable. Well, the team that has run the least soft and predictable defense over the last several years is the Eagles. I don't know any specific people within the organization, but there has to be some qualified assistant that the Packers could at least interview.
User avatar
Wade-A-Holic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,055
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 09, 2003

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#9 » by Wade-A-Holic » Thu Jan 8, 2009 5:27 pm

It sounds like it is going to come down to whoever is the best candidate that McCarthy can get along with, which is a little bit unnerving. I mean, Bret Bielema fired his defensive coordinator just because he didn't get along with him and that defensive coordinator went on to do a great job at Northwestern while the Badgers defense got much worse. I think McCarthy is a very good football coach but I fear that his desire to micromanage and have his hand in everything might be his down fall.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,119
And1: 55,662
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#10 » by MickeyDavis » Thu Jan 8, 2009 6:32 pm

New Orleans fired their DC yesterday and have Williams in for an interview today. If MM drags his feet Williams won't be an option. Although maybe that's exactly what he wants so he can bring in his buddy Nolan.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
eagle13
Head Coach
Posts: 6,145
And1: 107
Joined: Feb 15, 2007
Location: san diego

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#11 » by eagle13 » Thu Jan 8, 2009 7:06 pm

So far with Williams and with Johnson (as DL coach) and to lesser extent Nolan - these guys can coach either 4-3 or 3-4. Looks like M3 has not chosen scheme and to match DC but rather get the best DC and then choose scheme together. At least I hope. Maybe getting guy who can make gradual transition, OR is wise enuf to create a new hybrid based on guys we have +2 via draft or FA or trade.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,149
And1: 15,027
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#12 » by Ayt » Thu Jan 8, 2009 8:46 pm

Wade-A-Holic wrote:It sounds like it is going to come down to whoever is the best candidate that McCarthy can get along with, which is a little bit unnerving. I mean, Bret Bielema fired his defensive coordinator just because he didn't get along with him and that defensive coordinator went on to do a great job at Northwestern while the Badgers defense got much worse. I think McCarthy is a very good football coach but I fear that his desire to micromanage and have his hand in everything might be his down fall.


I don't really agree with this. Of course he wants to pick someone he knows he can work with. Beyond that, I don't see him as the type of coach that wants to meddle in the defense. He has his hands full on the offensive side of the ball. He wants someone whose defensive philosophy better fits what he wants, and from what he's stated in the past, that is a more creative defense than the one Sanders was able to come up with.

I think he reluctantly went with Sanders when he was first hired. The list of guys available at that point wasn't great, so they stuck with the system they had in place and promoted from within. Now he has the opportunity to clean out all the holdovers in the defensive staff and hire a new DC that can run the defense. I think he would have liked to have done this from the beginning, but the timing wasn't right. Now, he was able to fire basically everyone, and there is a great list of candidates, one of which he's very familiar with in Nolan.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#13 » by xTitan » Fri Jan 9, 2009 2:20 am

Packers want Williams to come in but he has not ties to anyone in the Packer organization. I keep hearing great thing about Williams but his defense was awful last year, got less pressure on the QB then the Pack did and the handful of games I had seen the Jags play I didn't see a lot of blitzing.....so who knows.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#14 » by El Duderino » Fri Jan 9, 2009 2:40 am

xTitan wrote:Packers want Williams to come in but he has not ties to anyone in the Packer organization. I keep hearing great thing about Williams but his defense was awful last year, got less pressure on the QB then the Pack did and the handful of games I had seen the Jags play I didn't see a lot of blitzing.....so who knows.


Don't forget that Del Rio is the head coach and comes from a defensive background. If i remember correctly, during our game with Jacksonville, there was mention that Williams and Del Rio didn't exactly see eye to eye on how to run the defense. Williams hasn't always been a big blitz guy, it depended on his personnel on defense, as it should be.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#15 » by xTitan » Fri Jan 9, 2009 2:54 am

El Duderino wrote:
xTitan wrote:Packers want Williams to come in but he has not ties to anyone in the Packer organization. I keep hearing great thing about Williams but his defense was awful last year, got less pressure on the QB then the Pack did and the handful of games I had seen the Jags play I didn't see a lot of blitzing.....so who knows.


Don't forget that Del Rio is the head coach and comes from a defensive background. If i remember correctly, during our game with Jacksonville, there was mention that Williams and Del Rio didn't exactly see eye to eye on how to run the defense. Williams hasn't always been a big blitz guy, it depended on his personnel on defense, as it should be.


Why am I beginning to get the feeling that it doesn't matter who GB hires, they are still going to be a soft defense with there ultra soft front 7.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#16 » by El Duderino » Fri Jan 9, 2009 3:19 am

If we stay a 4-3 defense, i think Jenkins/Kampman can be a pretty good combo at end, but we just badly need an influx of talent and athletic ability at defensive tackle, to me it was easily the biggest weakness on the defense and probably the whole team. If they can add an end as depth who can bring some pass rush ability in case of injury and so Jenkins can slide to DT on pass downs, that could help a lot. So could just adding a skilled DT with pass rush ability if they switch to a one gap scheme.

I'd also like to see a linebacker added who is skilled at blitzing and can make some big plays behind the line of scrimmage, but only so much can be done in one offseason, especially if Ted avoids free agency and sticks with only using the draft to add players.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,843
And1: 42,152
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#17 » by ReasonablySober » Fri Jan 9, 2009 4:15 am

I think there's a guy, likely available in the second round, that could be a real nice player for the Packers. Depending on where they go in round one, Clay Matthews could be a great pick. He's been an OLB in the past and a DE this season. He probably won't have his hand in the dirt, but he could be an excellent stand-up DE or OLB in a 3-4. Of all the USC talent in that Penn State game, Matthews looked the best.

On another note, Chris Brown maybe the most underrated offensive player in the country. People talk about Murray but I never here Brown's name mentioned. Everytime I see him play he looks outstanding. Nothing he does is overly flashy but he's always moving forward and he's fast as hell. On the other team, Harvin looks awesome.
User avatar
SugarRay34
Veteran
Posts: 2,914
And1: 11
Joined: Oct 10, 2003
Location: cappingthegame.com

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#18 » by SugarRay34 » Fri Jan 9, 2009 11:11 pm

If/when Nolan is hired I just hope he stays with 4 down lineman. Kampman and Jenkins 2 of our best players would have to adjust so much that it could make our defense even worse next year if we moved to a 3-4. I did not hear many good things about Nolan's "Big Nickel" defense which is a 4-2-5 but as long it involves the 4 lineman I am cool with it.

After all that, i would lreally like to atleast interview the guy from the Eagles. After what I saw with Spagnola in New York, I would love to get Jim Johnsons type of system in here.
User avatar
aaprigs311
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,425
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Location: Titletown

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#19 » by aaprigs311 » Fri Jan 9, 2009 11:39 pm

Anyone else on the Gregg Williams bandwagon with me ?
User avatar
aaprigs311
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,425
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Location: Titletown

Re: Sources: Nolan likely to run defense 

Post#20 » by aaprigs311 » Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:40 am

Williams interviewed with MM today and was at Lambeau nearly the entire day. Whichever direction MM chooses to go he needs to do it quick. The Saints are hot on Williams' trail and I'm sure other teams have a least contacted Nolan.

Return to Green Bay Packers