Overall talent level of this team
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 8:52 pm
I see a lot of people trying to judge TT vs. Sherman, or complain about the team's direction/lack of activity in free-agency. I have to ask you all:
Was this a 6-10 team with 6-10 level talent (or worse), or was it a 6-10 team with 10-6 level talent (or better)?
There's no complaining about injuries or free agency here, lets just judge the overall talent level of the team and see if the players lived up to that record.
Some examples (my opinion of course):
The Lions last year were an 0-16 team with 0-16 level talent (or worse, if that's possible).
The Seahawks last year were a 4-12 team with 8-8 level talent (or better).
The Titans last year were a 13-3 team with 8-8 level talent (or worse).
The Bears last year were a 9-7 team with 6-10 level talent (or worse).
I'll argue 2 things:
1. During the Sherman era, we were a 6-10 talent level team that finished above that every year thanks to one Mr. Brett Favre.
2. Today, we're a 6-10 team with 11-5 talent (OR BETTER if we hit with our first few picks in the draft this year).
Thoughts?
Was this a 6-10 team with 6-10 level talent (or worse), or was it a 6-10 team with 10-6 level talent (or better)?
There's no complaining about injuries or free agency here, lets just judge the overall talent level of the team and see if the players lived up to that record.
Some examples (my opinion of course):
The Lions last year were an 0-16 team with 0-16 level talent (or worse, if that's possible).
The Seahawks last year were a 4-12 team with 8-8 level talent (or better).
The Titans last year were a 13-3 team with 8-8 level talent (or worse).
The Bears last year were a 9-7 team with 6-10 level talent (or worse).
I'll argue 2 things:
1. During the Sherman era, we were a 6-10 talent level team that finished above that every year thanks to one Mr. Brett Favre.
2. Today, we're a 6-10 team with 11-5 talent (OR BETTER if we hit with our first few picks in the draft this year).
Thoughts?