More Playoff Teams?

Moderator: TyCobb

User avatar
Scalabrine
RealGM
Posts: 17,503
And1: 7,335
Joined: Jun 02, 2004
Location: NorCal
     

More Playoff Teams? 

Post#1 » by Scalabrine » Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:31 pm

What would the league do if they maybe expanded the playoff teams to 6 per league.

I think it would make it better becauase there are so many teams that are good that cant make the playoffs. It would lead to more upsets and more possibilities in the leaegue.

Its just so hard for teams that arent considered the elite (Yankees, Red Sox, White Sox, Twins, Tigers, Angels) three of those teams wont even make the playoffs this year and I think that any of those teams could win the world series but some wont even get a chance.

I know its not gonna happen but what are some pros an cons and maybe even ways we can fit it in without expanding the season much further?
Triple M
General Manager
Posts: 9,162
And1: 2,800
Joined: Apr 30, 2005
Location: 1994 of an Alternate Universe World Seres Parade
         

 

Post#2 » by Triple M » Sun Apr 22, 2007 2:18 am

I think the present playoff format is fine as is, Baseball has the most exciting post season and I really don't want to see it watered down. Also giving the top teams a bye in this type of format can actually be a disadvantage as resting a week-10 games is not really practical in baseball.
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

 

Post#3 » by WEFFPIM » Sun Apr 22, 2007 3:04 am

As much as I would love to see the playoffs expanded for more teams, this format is working very well, and it won't change for awhile.
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,870
And1: 26,392
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#4 » by trwi7 » Sun Apr 22, 2007 4:10 am

6 teams? So what happens when you get to the next round and there's only 3 teams? It's either 4 or 8.
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

 

Post#5 » by WEFFPIM » Sun Apr 22, 2007 5:29 am

trwi7 wrote:6 teams? So what happens when you get to the next round and there's only 3 teams? It's either 4 or 8.


You could have "bye-weeks" for the top 2 teams ala NFL
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#6 » by Bleeding Green » Sun Apr 22, 2007 6:44 am

No. The playoffs already go into the first week of October when it's cold. No more. Adding more teams removes some of the importance of the regular season.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

 

Post#7 » by SportsWorld » Sun Apr 22, 2007 5:01 pm

More Playoff Teams=Baseball in November=Cold
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

 

Post#8 » by WEFFPIM » Sun Apr 22, 2007 5:07 pm

SportsWorld wrote:More Playoff Teams=Baseball in November=Cold


Yeah. Maybe if the season were shortened to 154 games
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
J-Rich-
Banned User
Posts: 4,725
And1: 4
Joined: Jan 27, 2003

 

Post#9 » by J-Rich- » Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:56 pm

more teams=no more celebrating after clinching because they have a chance to get to the playoffs more often=no fun=some teams dont deserve to be there=etc.
studcrackers
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,226
And1: 6,100
Joined: Oct 31, 2004
Location: Getting hit in the head
         

 

Post#10 » by studcrackers » Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:42 pm

id love for 6 to be in but teams get rusty therefore it wouldnt work and 8 teams would water it down to much.
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
User avatar
Mardy2Curry
Junior
Posts: 344
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 13, 2007

 

Post#11 » by Mardy2Curry » Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:10 pm

Baseball has a 162 game season, now you add and extra round meaning that for sake of arguement a team could play 4 7-game series adding another 28 games to their already long season and like others said before me say a northeast team makes the WS, Boston, the NY's, Philly etc we'll be watching the ws with snow on the field. Not good totally not good. Next thing you know they'll want to move the WS to warm climate venue. If you cut back on the regular season games than maybe it would work. 8 teams would't be bad thats half the field in every league and its not like teams that don't need to be there will make it. It will still be quality postseason baseball.
Image
User avatar
bigboy1234
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,116
And1: 7
Joined: May 29, 2006

 

Post#12 » by bigboy1234 » Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:14 pm

There should only be 4 teams in the baseball playoffs.

But, I would really like if they made the seasons shorter (120), and the playoff series longer(best of 11). Right now, the first round of the playoffs is stupid, you play 162 games, and u can be out in 3 games, I don't like that much. But this will never happen, it just should.

Return to The General MLB Board