ImageImage

Superbowl thread

Moderator: Jake0890

Miller4ever
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,596
And1: 283
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Location: Location: Location:

Superbowl thread 

Post#1 » by Miller4ever » Mon Jan 25, 2010 1:27 pm

In case anybody wants to discuss.
User avatar
Dunthreevy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,946
And1: 1,353
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#2 » by Dunthreevy » Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:56 pm

Why would anyone around here want to discuss our team? :roll:

I haven't frequented too many other team boards on realgm, but I would be surprised if this one didn't have the least activity of them all.

Anyway, hooray for the us. 2nd Super Bowl in 4 seasons, and I actually get to enjoy this one, instead of hearing about it while in Iraq. I can't wait for February 7th! :D
Feel the rhythm! Feel the rhyme! Get on up, it's bobsled time!
User avatar
PR07
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,180
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 25, 2003
Location: PacersRule07

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#3 » by PR07 » Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:02 pm

Can't wait to see the boys play in blue down in Miami.
User avatar
Bleeding Blue
Head Coach
Posts: 6,573
And1: 538
Joined: Feb 29, 2008
Location: Home Of The Worlds Largest Christmas Tree
   

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#4 » by Bleeding Blue » Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:42 pm

I am super pumped for the game. Hopefully it won't rain like crazy like it did last time. My neighbors are actually driving to Miami to just tailgate, I can't even imagine how crazy that will be.

As far as the game goes, I think it is going to be a much better game than our last Super Bowl. Our defense will be the key to victory, much like the first 2 playoff games. If we get into a shootout with the Saints I think it reduces our chance of victory. Manning shouldn't have many problems with the Saints D as long as his protection is good. Favre got beat up real good (Which I enjoyed), but I don't see the same fate for Manning. Colts Win 30-24
"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my ass!"

- Bobby Knight
Miller4ever
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,596
And1: 283
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#5 » by Miller4ever » Thu Jan 28, 2010 6:19 pm

The thing about our defense against the Saints' is that our secondary is better, which means that if Manning is having an easier time than Brees, then we'll win. But this will be close.
User avatar
Dunthreevy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,946
And1: 1,353
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#6 » by Dunthreevy » Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:05 am

Bleeding Blue wrote:I am super pumped for the game. Hopefully it won't rain like crazy like it did last time. My neighbors are actually driving to Miami to just tailgate, I can't even imagine how crazy that will be.

As far as the game goes, I think it is going to be a much better game than our last Super Bowl. Our defense will be the key to victory, much like the first 2 playoff games. If we get into a shootout with the Saints I think it reduces our chance of victory. Manning shouldn't have many problems with the Saints D as long as his protection is good. Favre got beat up real good (Which I enjoyed), but I don't see the same fate for Manning. Colts Win 30-24


I'll buy that.

Going to be one of the better Super Bowls in recent years I think.
Feel the rhythm! Feel the rhyme! Get on up, it's bobsled time!
User avatar
Bleeding Blue
Head Coach
Posts: 6,573
And1: 538
Joined: Feb 29, 2008
Location: Home Of The Worlds Largest Christmas Tree
   

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#7 » by Bleeding Blue » Tue Feb 2, 2010 2:09 pm

I am sure everyone has heard, but Freeney has a torn ligament in his right ankle. This is a HUGE injury for us. The only bigger injury we could suffer would be Manning IMO. The Colts are holding hope that he will play, but I cannot see how he will be effective at all. They reported on ESPN that this injury normally needs 6-8 weeks to heal, Freeney has two.

This puts much more pressure on Manning & Co. to put up points because without Freeney the Saints will double team Mathis and potentially have an extra receiver they wouldn't have if Freeney was in the game. I still like our chances of winning, but to say I am 100% confident would be a lie.
"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my ass!"

- Bobby Knight
User avatar
Dunthreevy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,946
And1: 1,353
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#8 » by Dunthreevy » Tue Feb 2, 2010 3:49 pm

Freeney not playing would definitely be a huge blow to the defense. Having said that, I still think we have the players capable of filling the gap. Raheem Brock could start for a lot of the teams in the NFL and I assume he's going to see a lot of time this Sunday. Eric Foster will probably see a lot of time also, and as we all have seen he's a damn good young lineman with a lot of upside.

I honestly don't see Freeney missing this game. I think his time will be limited but just his presence on the field is a diversion for offensive lines. I think he's going to tell the medical staff to give him a shot and tape that ankle up real good and get out of his way.
Feel the rhythm! Feel the rhyme! Get on up, it's bobsled time!
User avatar
Bleeding Blue
Head Coach
Posts: 6,573
And1: 538
Joined: Feb 29, 2008
Location: Home Of The Worlds Largest Christmas Tree
   

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#9 » by Bleeding Blue » Tue Feb 2, 2010 6:52 pm

Dunthreevy wrote:Freeney not playing would definitely be a huge blow to the defense. Having said that, I still think we have the players capable of filling the gap. Raheem Brock could start for a lot of the teams in the NFL and I assume he's going to see a lot of time this Sunday. Eric Foster will probably see a lot of time also, and as we all have seen he's a damn good young lineman with a lot of upside.

I honestly don't see Freeney missing this game. I think his time will be limited but just his presence on the field is a diversion for offensive lines. I think he's going to tell the medical staff to give him a shot and tape that ankle up real good and get out of his way.


I agree that he will play, nothing will keep him for suiting up. I just question how effective he will be.
"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my ass!"

- Bobby Knight
User avatar
Latrell
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,447
And1: 5,552
Joined: May 06, 2004
Location: Tuscaloosa
     

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#10 » by Latrell » Wed Feb 3, 2010 3:20 am

Bleeding Blue wrote:
Dunthreevy wrote:Freeney not playing would definitely be a huge blow to the defense. Having said that, I still think we have the players capable of filling the gap. Raheem Brock could start for a lot of the teams in the NFL and I assume he's going to see a lot of time this Sunday. Eric Foster will probably see a lot of time also, and as we all have seen he's a damn good young lineman with a lot of upside.

I honestly don't see Freeney missing this game. I think his time will be limited but just his presence on the field is a diversion for offensive lines. I think he's going to tell the medical staff to give him a shot and tape that ankle up real good and get out of his way.


I agree that he will play, nothing will keep him for suiting up. I just question how effective he will be.


A slightly less effective Dwight is still better then no Dwight..With no Dwight the Saints can slide their protection on Mathis all day long.
Image
Miller4ever
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,596
And1: 283
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#11 » by Miller4ever » Wed Feb 3, 2010 6:21 pm

The DT's need to step up for this game. Their success will help makeup for Dwight's injury and also mitigate the runblocking of the Saints
User avatar
Dunthreevy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,946
And1: 1,353
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#12 » by Dunthreevy » Wed Feb 3, 2010 6:46 pm

Good news!

Freeney says ankle feels better each day
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/ ... id=4882978
Feel the rhythm! Feel the rhyme! Get on up, it's bobsled time!
User avatar
Bleeding Blue
Head Coach
Posts: 6,573
And1: 538
Joined: Feb 29, 2008
Location: Home Of The Worlds Largest Christmas Tree
   

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#13 » by Bleeding Blue » Thu Feb 4, 2010 4:05 am

Kravitz said today that he has heard from multiple sources that Powers had an operation on his foot. Powers said he is going to play, but who knows. We could really use him out there.
"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my ass!"

- Bobby Knight
User avatar
Dobber-16
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,486
And1: 439
Joined: May 19, 2009

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#14 » by Dobber-16 » Thu Feb 4, 2010 11:45 am

Colts win of course, but the game will be decided in the 4th quarter. The defense makes the plays, forces turnovers, and the Saints will be back to the bag days. Ain't dat nice.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote: all you guys bitching sound like fixed income grandmas at the grocery store.
User avatar
Dunthreevy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,946
And1: 1,353
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#15 » by Dunthreevy » Sat Feb 6, 2010 5:48 pm

1 more day! I'm stupid amped about the game. Only good things for our boys in blue.
Feel the rhythm! Feel the rhyme! Get on up, it's bobsled time!
MSGBallerz
Banned User
Posts: 3,748
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Location: NYC

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#16 » by MSGBallerz » Mon Feb 8, 2010 3:01 am

Saints win. Saints' defense absolutely outplayed the Colts defense. That was just pitiful. Manning has every right to demand a trade.
DubaLakers
Banned User
Posts: 3,830
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 02, 2007
Location: OC, CA

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#17 » by DubaLakers » Mon Feb 8, 2010 4:25 am

Saints pulled a onside kick out of their ass, just a terrible gameble and it paid off, then Peyon threw and Reggie made about the worst play they've ever made together on that pick 6. Then the 2 point BS conversion that wasn't a completion, wasn't meant to be, Saints were fortunate today.
User avatar
Charcoal Filtered
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,221
And1: 36
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Vancouver, WA

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#18 » by Charcoal Filtered » Mon Feb 8, 2010 5:09 am

Congrats to the Saints, they clearly outplayed us. We could not get any pressure on the QB and that was not good with our small DB's matched up with big WR's. We could not make the big play and Reggie Wayne hardly looked like an ALL PRO reciever today.

I still cannot believe a veteran WR was the player choking on that onside. We should have been ready for it.
The NBA: Where convicted tax evader Ken Mauer happens to officiate.
User avatar
Dunthreevy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,946
And1: 1,353
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#19 » by Dunthreevy » Mon Feb 8, 2010 6:39 pm

Hank Baskett was clearly thinking about the post-game sex he was going to be getting from Kendra, instead of thinking about recovering an onside kick.
Feel the rhythm! Feel the rhyme! Get on up, it's bobsled time!
User avatar
PR07
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,180
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 25, 2003
Location: PacersRule07

Re: Superbowl thread 

Post#20 » by PR07 » Mon Feb 8, 2010 11:12 pm

I think the Colts are the better team and would probably win at least 6 times if they played 10 games. However, the Saints were the better team yesterday. Our defense looked lost and was way too soft in coverage. Offense didn't make the plays late. Saints gambled, and their gambles paid off.

Return to Indianapolis Colts