Round 3, Pick 68: D. Smoot

Post #1 » by **UCF** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:14 pm

Hopefully we go O-line or TE with this pick.

Post #2 » by **JaxMagic** » Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:30 pm

Nathan Peterman could be a guy to keep an eye on if he is till there in the 3rd.

Post #3 » by **UCF** » Sat Apr 29, 2017 2:01 am

Read on Twitter

Nemesis21 · Post #4 » by **Nemesis21** » Mon May 1, 2017 3:38 pm

Should have went O line in this round also, not DE.

Post #5 » by **JaxMagic** » Mon May 1, 2017 9:36 pm

Nemesis21 wrote:Should have went O line in this round also, not DE.

The armchair GM in me agrees.

Post #6 » by **UCF** » Tue May 2, 2017 1:46 am

This was the pick that didn't make sense to me. I would have preferred more depth at OL.

TDJacksonville · Post #7 » by **TDJacksonville** » Sun May 14, 2017 3:25 pm

UCF wrote:This was the pick that didn't make sense to me. I would have preferred more depth at OL.

The Westbrook pick made less sense but I agree with either a te or oline here.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk

Post #8 » by **UCF** » Mon May 15, 2017 2:31 pm

TDJacksonville wrote:
UCF wrote:This was the pick that didn't make sense to me. I would have preferred more depth at OL.

The Westbrook pick made less sense but I agree with either a te or oline here.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk

I think this is more about how they graded these guys. Quality over position need. Westbrook has the chance to be something special if he can keep his head on straight.

TDJacksonville · Post #9 » by **TDJacksonville** » Mon May 15, 2017 6:22 pm

UCF wrote:
TDJacksonville wrote:
UCF wrote:This was the pick that didn't make sense to me. I would have preferred more depth at OL.

The Westbrook pick made less sense but I agree with either a te or oline here.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk

I think this is more about how they graded these guys. Quality over position need. Westbrook has the chance to be something special if he can keep his head on straight.

The only way dede plays is if we let either Robinson or lee or both walk. Robinson should be a no brainer to keep. Lee is debatable cuz of his injury history

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk

Post #10 » by **UCF** » Mon May 15, 2017 6:52 pm

I'm hopefully they trade one of them to improve depth elsewhere if that's the case. Robinson should get the extension he's earned.

TDJacksonville · Post #11 » by **TDJacksonville** » Mon May 15, 2017 7:03 pm

UCF wrote:I'm hopefully they trade one of them to improve depth elsewhere if that's the case. Robinson should get the extension he's earned.

You have to consider the fact we used a 4th round pick on a 4th wr on a run-heavy team. That's bad management 101. Look at who's available to help the defense or even the run game.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk

Post #12 » by **UCF** » Mon May 15, 2017 8:19 pm

Yeah, I admittedly was a bit confused as to the need to draft another WR. Coughlin might look to spend that extra cash on 1 year deals for veterans in the fa market to plug the holes in the depth chart.

TDJacksonville · Post #13 » by **TDJacksonville** » Mon May 15, 2017 8:21 pm

UCF wrote:Yeah, I admittedly was a bit confused as to the need to draft another WR. Coughlin might look to spend that extra cash on 1 year deals for veterans in the fa market to plug the holes in the depth chart.

Its not like lee is gonna make more then 6 million. Rather have lee and we don't have cap space problems so

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk

Post #14 » by **UCF** » Mon May 15, 2017 8:56 pm

If Lee can be signed for a decent amount it's a no brainer.

I'm really interested to see how the added emphasis on the run game will impact the performance of our WR's.

TDJacksonville · Post #15 » by **TDJacksonville** » Mon May 15, 2017 9:09 pm

UCF wrote:If Lee can be signed for a decent amount it's a no brainer.

I'm really interested to see how the added emphasis on the run game will impact the performance of our WR's.

Its kinda like Coughlin didn't realize his 3 best skill guys are wrs. I'm still not even sold on Fournette being an elite nfl rb.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk

Post #16 » by **UCF** » Mon May 15, 2017 9:29 pm

I would have rather drafted cook in the second

TDJacksonville · Post #17 » by **TDJacksonville** » Mon May 15, 2017 9:39 pm

UCF wrote:I would have rather drafted cook in the second

Eh I rather have gotten McNichols in round 5.

Something like Allen, Robinson, Elflein, Lawson, McNichols, Myrick, Williams.

Gets big end settled. Brings in 2 quality olinemen. Adds a good pass rushing Leo. McNichols brings promise to rb.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk