ImageImageImageImage

Unretired retired numbers

GreenerPastures
Banned User
Posts: 3,202
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 04, 2005

Unretired retired numbers 

Post#1 » by GreenerPastures » Thu Jul 5, 2007 10:43 pm

The following players numbers have yet to be retired, even though they were the last ones to wear it.

5 -- Nomar Garciaparra
14 -- Jim Rice
21 -- Roger Clemens


42 and Mo Vaughn doesn't count because major league baseball had already retired it all across in honor of Jackie Robinson.

Now do you think that the organization will ever formally retire their numbers? In Nomar's case, he left on a rather sour note, so probably not. In Rice's case, he has to make the HOF, right? And as for Clemens, that depends on what hat he will wear when he is inducted into the hall-of-fame. It'll probably be with the Bombers, although Clemens has seemingly gotten less bitter about his "divorce" in '96 with us with every passing year.

I wonder if you HAVE to be a hall of famer in order to have your number retired. There are a lot of intelligent baseball posters here, so I'll leave that up to you.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#2 » by Basketball Jesus » Thu Jul 5, 2007 10:50 pm

From the Sox home page:

The Red Sox policy on retiring uniform numbers is based on the following criteria:
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#3 » by Basketball Jesus » Thu Jul 5, 2007 10:51 pm

The question now becomes whether they waive the ten-year requirement for Petey.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
GreenerPastures
Banned User
Posts: 3,202
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 04, 2005

 

Post#4 » by GreenerPastures » Thu Jul 5, 2007 10:56 pm

So Nomar doesn't qualify... too bad. But they've probably retired it, in an unofficial manner, out of respect. Even though he doesn't deserve it.

Jim Rice just has to make the HOF. He is bound to at some point.

The biggest ? mark is Clemens, IMO. That'll be the most deserving of three, yet the most controversial one as well.
The Rondo Show
Analyst
Posts: 3,588
And1: 327
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

 

Post#5 » by The Rondo Show » Thu Jul 5, 2007 11:03 pm

Basketball Jesus wrote:The question now becomes whether they waive the ten-year requirement for Petey.
They better.
Image
GreenerPastures
Banned User
Posts: 3,202
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 04, 2005

 

Post#6 » by GreenerPastures » Thu Jul 5, 2007 11:09 pm

Oh yeah Pedro is another one, he's in the same boat as Nomar
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#7 » by Basketball Jesus » Thu Jul 5, 2007 11:11 pm

Except that Pedro has possibly the best stretch of pitching in the history of baseball during his stint with the club. Nomar was just a very, very good SS.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
GreenerPastures
Banned User
Posts: 3,202
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 04, 2005

 

Post#8 » by GreenerPastures » Thu Jul 5, 2007 11:18 pm

I was at the 17 K 1 run performance game against the Devil Rays. Fantastic. What sucked is the fact that we scored 0 runs that game. Jimy Williams, you f-ng moron. Why did you start f-ng Andy Sheets over Nomar?
User avatar
Dirty Water
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,785
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 29, 2005
Location: The future

 

Post#9 » by Dirty Water » Fri Jul 6, 2007 2:10 am

It's all about overpaying for marginal upgrades according the the baseball gurus in this forum. No one stays with a team for 10 years anymore. They are going to have to banish that rule.
User avatar
Bleeding Green
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,178
And1: 13,875
Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Location: Atlantic Champs OMG OMG OMG!

 

Post#10 » by Bleeding Green » Fri Jul 6, 2007 4:37 am

Clemens and Pedro will be retired. The others? Nah. Nomar isn't going to sniff the Hall now that he's basically washed up as a 1B with no power.

Jim Rice will not make the Hall of Fame. And if he does, I'm going to cry for Dwight Evans' sake.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,596
And1: 8,074
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

 

Post#11 » by Celtics_Champs » Fri Jul 6, 2007 4:41 am

Yep, I have the feeling they will make the exception with pedro.

Clemens, probably. I hope the retire it.

Probably not nomar.

Jim Rice, ya never know. I am tired of getting hopes up though, that he will get in, and every year he is on the pre game show after the decision was made, and ya just feel bad for the guy.

Cool discussion though. Who are others that deserve to be brought up in discussions. I swear awhile ago I read on Bostondirtdogs, that they were set to retire Conigliaro. Maybe I misread it, and it was an oppinion thread.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#12 » by Basketball Jesus » Fri Jul 6, 2007 12:22 pm

Ghost of the Garden wrote:It's all about overpaying for marginal upgrades according the the baseball gurus in this forum. No one stays with a team for 10 years anymore. They are going to have to banish that rule.


Nope; it's all about getting one's uniform dirty and TEH 25!!!
User avatar
2004RedSox
Sophomore
Posts: 109
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 19, 2007

Clemens... a must! 

Post#13 » by 2004RedSox » Sat Jul 21, 2007 11:21 pm

The biggest ? mark is Clemens, IMO. That'll be the most deserving of three, yet the most controversial one as well.


I would have to say Clemens has to be on the list... Period. 7 Cy Young awards (2 more than anyone else has) and has dominated the pitching world through the 80's, 90's, and now the 2000's. Incredible!

I would have to say that it's a bit funny that he started with the Bo Sox and might be ending at the Yank's.

I would have to say that as soon as Rice hits the HOF, done.

Great discussion though...
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,745
And1: 229
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#14 » by sunshinekids99 » Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:58 am

I'd like to see the Sox put Pesky's number up there. He's been with the Red Sox for so long. I know the numbers don't back it up, but I think he deserves it.
Image
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#15 » by Basketball Jesus » Sun Jul 22, 2007 1:45 pm

They officially named the pole after him, though. That (i.e. having something named after you) is one of the highest honors a non-HoFer can receive here, it seems.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.

Return to Boston Red Sox