Offseason thread
Moderator: Worm Guts
Re: Offseason thread
- hermes
- RealGM
- Posts: 93,367
- And1: 24,584
- Joined: Aug 27, 2007
- Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
Re: Offseason thread
so loeffler, berger, asiata are all coming back, and they tendered mike harris
Re: Offseason thread
- hermes
- RealGM
- Posts: 93,367
- And1: 24,584
- Joined: Aug 27, 2007
- Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
Re: Offseason thread
felton is a bill now
lot of interesting trades today
lot of interesting trades today
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 762
- And1: 165
- Joined: Nov 30, 2013
Re:
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,919
- And1: 5,943
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re:
T-wOlvEs 420 wrote:Little disappointed we've done nothing. ?
Sent from my SM-G900T using RealGM Forums mobile app
Boling would've been nice, but I'm still holding out hope for Taylor Mays. That's really the only guy I really wanted a lot. There's question marks at LT, RB, most of LB core, G, and CB, but I think SS is the only thing that'd be hard to address in house or in the draft.
Re: Offseason thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,919
- And1: 5,943
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: Offseason thread
McClain and Spikes are still out there if they want to bring in somebody inside LB. Otherwise I say go old school and bring in Harrison and Briggs and sub in youth on 3rd down. Greenway/Briggs/Harrison sounds fun to me, maybe i'm a weirdo.
Re:
- hermes
- RealGM
- Posts: 93,367
- And1: 24,584
- Joined: Aug 27, 2007
- Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
Re:
T-wOlvEs 420 wrote:Little disappointed we've done nothing. ?
Sent from my SM-G900T using RealGM Forums mobile app
they've been warning us for a month that they are going to take it slow, i'm not surprised they haven't made a big splash yet
Re: Offseason thread
- Goudelock
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 9,286
- And1: 20,868
- Joined: Jan 27, 2015
- Location: College of Charleston
Re: Offseason thread
I'm glad that they didn't do what the Giants just did and give a bunch of huge contracts to mediocre players.
Devin Booker wrote:Bro.
Re: Re:
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,919
- And1: 5,943
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: Re:
Devilzsidewalk wrote:T-wOlvEs 420 wrote:Little disappointed we've done nothing. ?
Sent from my SM-G900T using RealGM Forums mobile app
Boling would've been nice, but I'm still holding out hope for Taylor Mays. That's really the only guy I really wanted a lot. There's question marks at LT, RB, most of LB core, G, and CB, but I think SS is the only thing that'd be hard to address in house or in the draft.
I take that back, I forgot about Exum - he's got a lot of talent. I think he can be a starting SS in this league.
Having Exum on the field and Mays as a quasi-WLB in the nickel packages would be really nice.
Re: Offseason thread
- hermes
- RealGM
- Posts: 93,367
- And1: 24,584
- Joined: Aug 27, 2007
- Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
Re: Offseason thread
i wonder if they are waiting for the peterson ball to drop before getting on with other things - might be moving now that murray has signed
and i guess we're in talks with everyone who zimmer coached in cinncy
and i guess we're in talks with everyone who zimmer coached in cinncy
Re: Offseason thread
- hermes
- RealGM
- Posts: 93,367
- And1: 24,584
- Joined: Aug 27, 2007
- Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
Re: Offseason thread
now patterson might be on the trade block? wow
Offseason thread
- Twolf16
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,091
- And1: 89
- Joined: Jun 05, 2013
Offseason thread
I know crazy, and a waste of several draft picks. Just read we trades for Mike Wallace! We gave the dolphins a 5th round and we received a 7th.hermes wrote:now patterson might be on the trade block? wow
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Offseason thread
- hermes
- RealGM
- Posts: 93,367
- And1: 24,584
- Joined: Aug 27, 2007
- Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
Re: Offseason thread
holy smokes what?????????
Re: Offseason thread
-
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 26,166
- And1: 10,586
- Joined: Dec 27, 2003
Re: Offseason thread
Crazy, I don't know what to make of that. Why was Miami looking to move him? Does this mean we're not looking receiver in the 1st? Does it mean we need to move Peterson's contract?
Re: Offseason thread
- hermes
- RealGM
- Posts: 93,367
- And1: 24,584
- Joined: Aug 27, 2007
- Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
Re: Offseason thread
people seem to think that his contract is going to be restructured (otherwise why would we have traded for him) but i haven't seen anything saying so
and yeah, wr is probably off the table - but maybe we don't keep jennings which i don't know why we wouldn't
and yeah, wr is probably off the table - but maybe we don't keep jennings which i don't know why we wouldn't
Re: Offseason thread
- hermes
- RealGM
- Posts: 93,367
- And1: 24,584
- Joined: Aug 27, 2007
- Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
Re: Offseason thread
[tweet]https://twitter.com/vikingterritory/status/576533183912648705[/tweet]
oh jeez
oh jeez
Offseason thread
- Twolf16
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,091
- And1: 89
- Joined: Jun 05, 2013
Offseason thread
Worm Guts wrote:Crazy, I don't know what to make of that. Why was Miami looking to move him? Does this mean we're not looking receiver in the 1st? Does it mean we need to move Peterson's contract?
Miami was looking to move him because Wallace and the coaches had conflicting opinions about how he was used. It's been well documented the dolphins haven't used him the way they should of. I hope he restructures, but I doubt it. I like the move. Wallace, Jennings, Johnson, and Wright is a solid core. My guess is AP is traded. Now hopefully we can draft Collins, Scherf, or Thompson.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Offseason thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,919
- And1: 5,943
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: Offseason thread
Would've preferred to trade for Stills or sign Torrey Smith(or Desean Jackson last year for that matter), but Wallace is still an improvement over Jennings, so why not. Hopefully he's not a crybaby.
Re: Offseason thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,919
- And1: 5,943
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: Offseason thread
hermes wrote:people seem to think that his contract is going to be restructured (otherwise why would we have traded for him) but i haven't seen anything saying so
and yeah, wr is probably off the table - but maybe we don't keep jennings which i don't know why we wouldn't
Jennings wasn't in the top 30 of WRs last year, but he's making 9 mil. That cut should be automatic with or without Wallace.
Re: Offseason thread
- hermes
- RealGM
- Posts: 93,367
- And1: 24,584
- Joined: Aug 27, 2007
- Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
Re: Offseason thread
rumors are flying all over about whether he's restructured or not, he probably won't (this year anyway) - and they have the cap room to have him anyway i think. they still can restructure greenway (and maybe jennings - but i doubt that)