Page 1 of 2
Minnesota Vikings
Posted: Mon Apr 2, 2007 1:36 am
by kg2005
They kind of suck. So... nowhere to go but up!
Posted: Mon Apr 2, 2007 1:37 am
by Klomp
Well, they could go farther down.
Posted: Mon Apr 2, 2007 1:40 am
by kg2005
I suppose, but the state of the franchise is pretty much rock bottom.
Posted: Mon Apr 2, 2007 1:42 am
by FlightNo.23
Actually the franchise is in pretty good shape.
The defense is one of the better ones in the league. The only problem is that this team could've been a superbowl contender if they still had Culpepper and Moss now that they have a solid defense.
Posted: Mon Apr 2, 2007 3:07 am
by Devilzsidewalk
I found the defense to be highly overrated. No pass rush, mediocre secondary, nice run D, but who cares, you didnt even need to bother running the ball against the Vikings.
Vikings don't look to be in great shape to me. Childress is a weirdo, there's nothing at wide receiver, there's 1/2 of a good offensive line, an inexperienced rookie at QB, no pass rushers, all the starters at lb are question-marks; EJ is back at mlb where he struggled last time he was there, the other lb's are a guy who hasn't played a snap at lb yet in the NFL, and a journey man, 1 of the CB's is a full-time starter for the first time, the SS missed all last year.....there's problems.
Things could turn out well, but alot of things have to come together to make it happen.
Posted: Mon Apr 2, 2007 6:18 pm
by BiggMann
Overrated..? They had the #1 rush defense, with two DE's that we less than spectacluar. Udeze has what it takes to get it done, but just hasn't. Erasmus is often injured but shows flashes when healthy. Our LB crew should be solid, if Greenway can step up. Leber was solid last season, and EJ played like he did in college (which was at MLB). EJ struggled at MLB for the first little while, but now he's accustomed to the speed of the NFL and with the Williams Boys in the middle pretty much anyone could play MLB for us this year. And the fact that we lost Smoot was an addition by subtraction. It lets Griffin come in and start along side Winfield, our secondary still has some question marks... but we definitely have the ablity to get it done. Tank Williams and Greg Blue as SS, and Sharper and Dwight Smith at FS... I wouldn't be suprised to see Dwight Smith playing some Nickel or Dime CB either.
I dont think we have much to worry about on the defensive side of the ball... but our offense looks miserable. I dont mind TJack coming back to start, i think he's got all the skills necessary to be good, he just needs to be surrounded by playmakers... and as of right now we have none.
Posted: Mon Apr 2, 2007 9:09 pm
by dunkonu21
Davonte Edwards was also a very pleasant surprise at cornerback last season
Posted: Mon Apr 2, 2007 9:52 pm
by Devilzsidewalk
BiggMann wrote:Overrated..? They had the #1 rush defense, with two DE's that we less than spectacluar. Udeze has what it takes to get it done, but just hasn't. Erasmus is often injured but shows flashes when healthy. Our LB crew should be solid, if Greenway can step up. Leber was solid last season, and EJ played like he did in college (which was at MLB). EJ struggled at MLB for the first little while, but now he's accustomed to the speed of the NFL and with the Williams Boys in the middle pretty much anyone could play MLB for us this year. And the fact that we lost Smoot was an addition by subtraction. It lets Griffin come in and start along side Winfield, our secondary still has some question marks... but we definitely have the ablity to get it done. Tank Williams and Greg Blue as SS, and Sharper and Dwight Smith at FS... I wouldn't be suprised to see Dwight Smith playing some Nickel or Dime CB either.
I dont think we have much to worry about on the defensive side of the ball... but our offense looks miserable. I dont mind TJack coming back to start, i think he's got all the skills necessary to be good, he just needs to be surrounded by playmakers... and as of right now we have none.
bottom line is the Vikings were not good, or even average vs pass defense, they were downright horrible. That contributed to there great stats vs the run, nobody even bothered to run much of the time because the passing game worked so well.
I'm not down on the Vikings team, they got a lot of promise, and I'm personally cool with TJ at QB, but I'm of the opinion that they need at least one good DE and 2 good wide receivers. If they can sign Moulds then maybe trade down if CJ and Adrian Peterson are unavailable and pickup something like Ted Ginn and Lamar Woodley, then I'd be all "w00t w00t"
Posted: Mon Apr 2, 2007 10:41 pm
by nc21tarheels
Same boat I've been in for YEARS cheering on my 49ers, It'll soon get better. Patience my friends, PATIENCE. (i know I didn't wanna hear that **** back when the niners were getting stomped in week in and week out)
Posted: Tue Apr 3, 2007 7:33 pm
by revprodeji
Niners did a good job rebuilding, they did a very important thing. Which is to get a nice young coach that can be the face of the team.
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 12:03 am
by TheFranchise21
dunkonu21 wrote:Davonte Edwards was also a very pleasant surprise at cornerback last season
Am I missing something?
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 3:26 pm
by BiggMann
yeah our pass D was just flat out gross... but that wasn't because of our secondary, it was mainly because of our pass rush. When the QB has 5-8 seconds to find an open reciever it makes it very difficult for the secondary to stick on their man for that amount of time.
Udeze has to step up, i mean to play all 16 games and not record ONE FLIPPING sack is pittifull. Childress already said he doesn't plan on Erasmus being fully healthy by week 1.n So our D line is in trouble, but that doesn't mean we need to draft Jameel Anderson, however if Gaines Adams is available we'd be stupid not to draft him... he'll be a playmaker for sure. There are good DE's out there in this years draft, i'm pretty sure we will draft one in the first day. But like i said before, our main concern are our playmakers on the offensive side of the ball. TJ looks solid out there, Chester was a work horse... so we need to add some weapons for TJ to throw to and maybe add another RB to help carry the load... Mewelde, Ciatrick, and Pinner aren't my idea of a back up plan. Adding Adrian Peterson would be sweet but not likely, drafting CJ is very unlikely.... so our options are very limited, but something needs to be done
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 3:40 pm
by BiggMann
Vikings | Team invites Haddix for a tryout in May
Tue, 3 Apr 2007 18:09:21 -0700
Pete Iorizzo, of the Albany Times-Union, reports the Minnesota Vikings have invited Siena basketball player Michael Haddix for a tryout to be held the first week of May. Haddix is a former center on the Siena men's baseketball team. The Vikings have told Haddix they want to see him lift weights, run pass patterns and catch a few passes. If the workout goes well, the team might ask him to stay for a more extended workout. The team told Haddis they expect to work out three or four college basketball players to see if they can play tight end.
I thought Ciricui, and Shaincoe was a reach... but this is getting ridiculous. Michael Haddix...? i'm gonna have to do some research on this one.
Posted: Wed Apr 4, 2007 3:41 pm
by BiggMann
Posted: Fri Jun 1, 2007 3:24 am
by VikesRule
TheFranchise21 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Am I missing something?
I was about to say, lol. Edwards broke his arm last year.

Posted: Fri Jun 1, 2007 8:15 am
by TheFranchise21
Seriously, this diamond in the rough crap is getting old. Sign some legit ball players already. I don't care about guys who can run 2.9 40s and have six feet verticals. I care about guys who intercept 4-6 passes a year, get 10-12 sacks or 100-150 tackles.
Posted: Sun Jul 1, 2007 7:10 am
by Devilzsidewalk
TheFranchise21 wrote:Seriously, this diamond in the rough crap is getting old. Sign some legit ball players already. I don't care about guys who can run 2.9 40s and have six feet verticals. I care about guys who intercept 4-6 passes a year, get 10-12 sacks or 100-150 tackles.
I dunno, I kinda like those workout numbers. I'd take a 2.9 40 and a 6 foot vertical #1 overall sight unseen

Posted: Fri Jul 6, 2007 6:27 am
by TheFranchise21
A guy with great workout numbers and zero football experience/knowledge doesn't translate into success in the NFL.
Posted: Mon Jul 9, 2007 1:54 pm
by Worm Guts
Tell that to Antonio Gates
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:16 pm
by BiggMann
TheFranchise21 wrote:A guy with great workout numbers and zero football experience/knowledge doesn't translate into success in the NFL.
See: CHAD JACKSON
