Page 1 of 2
Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sat Oct 1, 2011 7:27 pm
by Celtics_Champs
Regular Season Record: 2-1
New England Patriots @ Oakland Raiders
Sunday October 2nd, 2011. 4:15 PM.
TV: CBS. Radio: 98.5 Sports Hub.
Richard Seymour vs his old team. Should be fun to see him again, but the bigger story is an emerging Oakland team hot off of a win against the NY Jets at home. We're going to be in for a game. Run DMC vs our improved 4-3. Unless Brady throws 4 picks again, I see a close win. The patriots after a loss are almost unbeatable, and I don't see them losing this one.
Go Pats!!!
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 2:14 pm
by Celtics_Champs
Bodden, Haynesworth, Hernandez, Dowling, Wright among those who are out.
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 8:32 pm
by Joselo16
Can tell Seymour up for this game! Got his old step back he was lacking towards the end of his tenure here! Should be interesting☺.
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 8:40 pm
by Joselo16
Welker definitely has his old step back for sure! Touchdown!!!
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 9:09 pm
by Geoffrey P
Ugh. This defense couldn't stop an LFL team's offense...
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 9:22 pm
by KGboss
Mayo now too?
Come on!
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 9:23 pm
by Celtics_Champs
Injuries are ending this seasons hopes at week 4.
God damn it.
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 9:29 pm
by KGboss
Clutch interception.
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 9:32 pm
by Celtics_Champs
Yeah he threw it right too him, but that was key for us. We're leading, we're driving, and we get the ball at half.
I just hope this team can make it to the end of the game. They're dropping like flies.
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 9:42 pm
by Celtics_Champs
They haven't even been playing that bad. It's been a solid game against a tough team. But....
Mayo
Woodhead
Love
how can ya not feel down right now? Mayo took his wrist tape off, and had to be helped off the field. That's not a good sign.
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 10:34 pm
by Celtics_Champs
Running away with this!
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 10:36 pm
by ZedgetRedd
At least it looks like we got a win here (holding my breath).
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 10:43 pm
by KGboss
WILFORK!
BIG MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 10:44 pm
by Celtics_Champs
LMAO
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 10:44 pm
by Celtics_Champs
Second pick of the year. Holy crap.
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 10:44 pm
by ZedgetRedd
Vince!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 10:44 pm
by Joselo16
Wilfork!!!!! He's really trying to bring it to the house this year!
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 10:45 pm
by Geoffrey P
Funniest site you'll ever see on the field
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 10:53 pm
by Joselo16
The defense still has issues! Our guys just don't have a rush, and our DB's just can't cover for that long. Also, why were Sanders and Merriweather (who I know struggles) let go?! When we didn't have a better option in place? A bad move, at least on Sanders, who while limited, was solid! Our LB's are just bad in coverage.
Re: Patriots @ Raiders. Time to Seymour.
Posted: Sun Oct 2, 2011 11:17 pm
by Celtics_Champs
Though the secondary is worse, and the defensive front 4 is better, it's really just the exact same defense as last year. Gives up tons of yards and points, then make key turnover when they need it. It got us to 14-2 last year. We're 3-1 this year with this win, lets see what happens next week against the jets.