ImageImageImageImage

OT: Patriots

Moderators: Parliament10, sully00

CeltsfaninDC
Veteran
Posts: 2,904
And1: 1,311
Joined: Oct 26, 2005
     

Re: OT: Patriots 

Post#101 » by CeltsfaninDC » Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:09 pm

Homerclease wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
Homerclease wrote:Not true, he wasn’t down by contact.


Doesn't matter if he was touched or not as far as calling it a completed pass. He was diving during the catch and had to maintain control all the way through the ground (unless ball never touches the ground).

I’m taking the play and basically breaking it in half. Part one - completed catch/establishing in bounds. Part two - football move and dive for the end zone. He grabs the ball and secures it, drops to one knee and reaches for the goal line. Should’ve been 6 points

You can break it up however you want, but thats not how it works. You assume he made the catch and THEN hit the ground but the rule is clear about this. Sorry, but you are 100% wrong here and arguing more just shows your ignorance of clearly stated rules that you've been shown here a number of times
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 24,005
And1: 21,824
Joined: Dec 09, 2015
       

Re: OT: Patriots 

Post#102 » by Homerclease » Tue Dec 19, 2017 4:00 pm

CeltsfaninDC wrote:
Homerclease wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
Doesn't matter if he was touched or not as far as calling it a completed pass. He was diving during the catch and had to maintain control all the way through the ground (unless ball never touches the ground).

I’m taking the play and basically breaking it in half. Part one - completed catch/establishing in bounds. Part two - football move and dive for the end zone. He grabs the ball and secures it, drops to one knee and reaches for the goal line. Should’ve been 6 points

You can break it up however you want, but thats not how it works. You assume he made the catch and THEN hit the ground but the rule is clear about this. Sorry, but you are 100% wrong here and arguing more just shows your ignorance of clearly stated rules that you've been shown here a number of times

Except the rule isn’t the case here. He had already made the catch. You can call it ignorance if you want to, doesn’t make you right or me wrong
CeltsfaninDC
Veteran
Posts: 2,904
And1: 1,311
Joined: Oct 26, 2005
     

Re: OT: Patriots 

Post#103 » by CeltsfaninDC » Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:09 pm

Homerclease wrote:
CeltsfaninDC wrote:
Homerclease wrote:I’m taking the play and basically breaking it in half. Part one - completed catch/establishing in bounds. Part two - football move and dive for the end zone. He grabs the ball and secures it, drops to one knee and reaches for the goal line. Should’ve been 6 points

You can break it up however you want, but thats not how it works. You assume he made the catch and THEN hit the ground but the rule is clear about this. Sorry, but you are 100% wrong here and arguing more just shows your ignorance of clearly stated rules that you've been shown here a number of times

Except the rule isn’t the case here. He had already made the catch. You can call it ignorance if you want to, doesn’t make you right or me wrong

SIGH...... yes it is ignorance because you are choosing to ignore the specific rule that regulates this specific incident which makes you 100% wrong. You've tried to break it up, you've tried to use different criteria and you've failed....... even Tomlin agreed it was the right call.
threrf23
RealGM
Posts: 12,741
And1: 2,006
Joined: Mar 22, 2004
Contact:

Re: OT: Patriots 

Post#104 » by threrf23 » Sun Dec 24, 2017 7:32 pm

Well, I thought that was a catch (Bills game)...
Bostondave
Pro Prospect
Posts: 961
And1: 482
Joined: Apr 20, 2017
   

Re: OT: Patriots 

Post#105 » by Bostondave » Mon Dec 25, 2017 2:03 am

What a slog that was for 3qtrs. Then we broke it open. We need Gronk to stay healthy to stand an outside chance. Our D is hurting right now. Thank goodness Bills have no real pass rush.

Glad to see Gillesley back on the field.
Bostondave
Pro Prospect
Posts: 961
And1: 482
Joined: Apr 20, 2017
   

Re: OT: Patriots 

Post#106 » by Bostondave » Mon Jan 8, 2018 2:32 am

OK PNation, looks like Titans are up first. Then on to Pitt in the Conf championship, then it's SB against Phil.
User avatar
ash_k
RealGM
Posts: 10,195
And1: 5,503
Joined: Apr 14, 2010
         

Re: OT: Patriots 

Post#107 » by ash_k » Sat Jan 13, 2018 4:59 am

Bostondave wrote:OK PNation, looks like Titans are up first. Then on to Pitt in the Conf championship, then it's SB against Phil.


What are you talking about? Phil will be eliminated tomorrow :wink:
Sinant wrote:I treat the Phoenix/Cleveland/Boston Shaqs like I do Wizards MJ. Never happened.
Absolutely ZERO pressure in 2019/2020, nada, aucune pression,kein Druck, sin presión -- we can just relax and enjoy NBA basketball
Bostondave
Pro Prospect
Posts: 961
And1: 482
Joined: Apr 20, 2017
   

Re: OT: Patriots 

Post#108 » by Bostondave » Sun Jan 14, 2018 12:35 am

Good game here. Phil v Atl
Bostondave
Pro Prospect
Posts: 961
And1: 482
Joined: Apr 20, 2017
   

Re: OT: Patriots 

Post#109 » by Bostondave » Sun Jan 14, 2018 12:38 am

Wow. This is it for Atl. one play.
Bostondave
Pro Prospect
Posts: 961
And1: 482
Joined: Apr 20, 2017
   

Re: OT: Patriots 

Post#110 » by Bostondave » Sun Jan 14, 2018 12:40 am

Wow. Busted play. Phi wins.
KGboss
RealGM
Posts: 19,947
And1: 8,108
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
Location: Boston Garden
       

Re: OT: Patriots 

Post#111 » by KGboss » Sun Jan 14, 2018 1:28 am

Anyone breathing around here?
Bostondave
Pro Prospect
Posts: 961
And1: 482
Joined: Apr 20, 2017
   

Re: OT: Patriots 

Post#112 » by Bostondave » Sun Jan 14, 2018 3:51 am

This clearly is not the place to be.
User avatar
ash_k
RealGM
Posts: 10,195
And1: 5,503
Joined: Apr 14, 2010
         

Re: OT: Patriots 

Post#113 » by ash_k » Sun Jan 14, 2018 4:18 am

Do the General board for Football..it is 'better'...this one has gone quiet
Sinant wrote:I treat the Phoenix/Cleveland/Boston Shaqs like I do Wizards MJ. Never happened.
Absolutely ZERO pressure in 2019/2020, nada, aucune pression,kein Druck, sin presión -- we can just relax and enjoy NBA basketball
User avatar
ash_k
RealGM
Posts: 10,195
And1: 5,503
Joined: Apr 14, 2010
         

Re: OT: Patriots 

Post#114 » by ash_k » Sun Jan 14, 2018 4:19 am

Sinant wrote:I treat the Phoenix/Cleveland/Boston Shaqs like I do Wizards MJ. Never happened.
Absolutely ZERO pressure in 2019/2020, nada, aucune pression,kein Druck, sin presión -- we can just relax and enjoy NBA basketball

Return to New England Patriots