Image

Mark Jackson to coach Knicks?

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

blue_gold7
Ballboy
Posts: 46
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 19, 2008

Mark Jackson to coach Knicks? 

Post#1 » by blue_gold7 » Fri Apr 4, 2008 6:09 pm

I recall Jackson's name being mentioned in rumors with the Pacers before the season. If he ends up in NY, then it is obvious who was making the calls last year.
Boneman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,313
And1: 1,665
Joined: Jul 07, 2003
Location: Indy
       

 

Post#2 » by Boneman2 » Fri Apr 4, 2008 6:22 pm

When the coaching rumors circulated before this season, Marc came out with a statement essentially saying there were too many chiefs in the front-office. So I'd agree that Bird is the reason Jackson didn't coming here.
xxSnEaKyPxx
RealGM
Posts: 18,432
And1: 19,060
Joined: Jun 02, 2007

 

Post#3 » by xxSnEaKyPxx » Fri Apr 4, 2008 6:43 pm

I disagree, Bird coached Jackson, for him to even be mentioned in our coaching job lets me know that they had some sort of bond through that. I really wish we had hired him, but wish him all the best where ever he goes.
dwpacer
Rookie
Posts: 1,137
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 11, 2003

 

Post#4 » by dwpacer » Fri Apr 4, 2008 6:57 pm

Regardless whether Isaiah stays or Mark Jackson comes in to coach, both increases the possibility of Tinsley to New York likely coming to fruition.

Tinsley has had a comparison to Mark Jackson from the day he's drafted, and even as Marbury's backup this year, he could very well excel.

However, an Isaiah Thomas departure does likely end most possibilities of Jermaine O'Neal going to New York.
blue_gold7
Ballboy
Posts: 46
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 19, 2008

 

Post#5 » by blue_gold7 » Fri Apr 4, 2008 8:31 pm

Boneman2 wrote:When the coaching rumors circulated before this season, Marc came out with a statement essentially saying there were too many chiefs in the front-office. So I'd agree that Bird is the reason Jackson didn't coming here.



Yes, I agree, which makes me even less likely to let Bird off of the hook or give him the benefit of the doubt. This goes to show he has been calling the shots for a while now.
YouveBeenZeked
Banned User
Posts: 411
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 22, 2008

 

Post#6 » by YouveBeenZeked » Fri Apr 4, 2008 8:54 pm

dwpacer wrote:Regardless whether Isaiah stays or Mark Jackson comes in to coach, both increases the possibility of Tinsley to New York likely coming to fruition.

Tinsley has had a comparison to Mark Jackson from the day he's drafted, and even as Marbury's backup this year, he could very well excel.

However, an Isaiah Thomas departure does likely end most possibilities of Jermaine O'Neal going to New York.


Walsh is not in the business of adding long-term deals.
User avatar
mizzoupacers
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 6,120
And1: 12
Joined: May 27, 2004

 

Post#7 » by mizzoupacers » Fri Apr 4, 2008 9:25 pm

^ That probably depends on what player(s) you are talking about.

As for Mark Jackson, why all the fuss? He's never coached, at any level, in any capacity. Maybe he would be a good coach, maybe he wouldn't, but he seems like a darkhorse candidate to me, for either the Knicks or the Pacers. I have absolutely no problem with the Pacers hiring O'Brien over Jackson, if Jackson ever even wanted the job to begin with.
User avatar
TSC25
Veteran
Posts: 2,549
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 08, 2004
Location: Indianapolis

 

Post#8 » by TSC25 » Sat Apr 5, 2008 1:08 am

dwpacer wrote:

However, an Isaiah Thomas departure does likely end most possibilities of Jermaine O'Neal going to New York.


I disagree with that,Donnie was the one who brought JO in and gave him a shot at being more than a bench player,and then when Larry come in the 1st thing he did was get rid of Zeke,who JO had come very close to after Larry said he wouldnt,so I dont see JO really wanting to be here without Donnie.
blue_gold7
Ballboy
Posts: 46
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 19, 2008

 

Post#9 » by blue_gold7 » Sat Apr 5, 2008 2:01 pm

mizzoupacers wrote:^ That probably depends on what player(s) you are talking about.

As for Mark Jackson, why all the fuss? He's never coached, at any level, in any capacity. Maybe he would be a good coach, maybe he wouldn't, but he seems like a darkhorse candidate to me, for either the Knicks or the Pacers. I have absolutely no problem with the Pacers hiring O'Brien over Jackson, if Jackson ever even wanted the job to begin with.


There is no fuss over Jackson, in fact I like O'Brien. I was simply using it as a way of trying to figure out how long Bird has really been in charge.
User avatar
bballpacen
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,255
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Location: DIENER>>>>>>>you
Contact:

 

Post#10 » by bballpacen » Sat Apr 5, 2008 2:35 pm

dwpacer wrote:Regardless whether Isaiah stays or Mark Jackson comes in to coach, both increases the possibility of Tinsley to New York likely coming to fruition.

Tinsley has had a comparison to Mark Jackson from the day he's drafted, and even as Marbury's backup this year, he could very well excel.

However, an Isaiah Thomas departure does likely end most possibilities of Jermaine O'Neal going to New York.
With Donnie in New York, there is NO chance at Tinsley ever going there.
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,711
And1: 13,951
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

 

Post#11 » by Scoot McGroot » Sat Apr 5, 2008 5:24 pm

blue_gold7 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



There is no fuss over Jackson, in fact I like O'Brien. I was simply using it as a way of trying to figure out how long Bird has really been in charge.



I don't think that the O'Brien hire really tells us anything new though. We were told early last summer that Bird was taking the reins, and afterwhich is when Bird fired Carlisle and then hired O'Brien. We know that he was given the public reins then.

Return to Indiana Pacers