Image

Who will be traded in the off-season?

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

Besides Jemaine O'neal and Jamaal Tinsley, who is most like to be traded?

Poll ended at Sun May 11, 2008 7:51 pm

Jeff Foster
4
24%
Marquis Daniels
1
6%
Shawne Williams
1
6%
Troy Murphy
2
12%
Danny Granger
0
No votes
Ike Diogu
8
47%
Mike Dunleavy
0
No votes
Other
1
6%
 
Total votes: 17

cdash
Analyst
Posts: 3,253
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2008

 

Post#21 » by cdash » Fri May 9, 2008 10:30 pm

My order (JO and Tinsley included): Tinsley, Diogu, Daniels, Foster, O'Neal, Williams, Murphy.

I just cant see Tinsley staying here with all thats been said about him by JOB, the Simons concerned about cleaning up our image, and the utter lack of support he has within the organization. He wont be easy to trade, but he will go. Diogu is cheap and someone probably still thinks he has some upside. He appeared to be in JOB's doghouse most of the season, so he's expendable. Not to mention, his relatively manageable contract is easy to package with other players in deals. Daniels has some value and again, we are looking to clean up our image. He can be useful to a playoff contender (probably in the Western Conference). Foster simply because he has the most value on this team outside of Granger. His contract is expiring, its manageable, he is a solid low post defender and does all the little things that winning teams love. Taking charges, tipping rebounds out, doesnt need shots, etc. O'Neal because he has stated he wants out, but is unlikely to get dealt because he has zero value and seems to be most concerned with getting healthy. Williams has shown potential, is firmly entrenched in the rotation, and has the outside shooting that JOB loves. I'd be mildly shocked to see him moved. Murphy's contract makes him extremely undesirable to other teams. He's going nowhere.
User avatar
Tommy Udo 6
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 42,507
And1: 28
Joined: Jun 13, 2003
Location: San Francisco/East Bay CA

 

Post#22 » by Tommy Udo 6 » Mon May 12, 2008 3:24 am

Lots of Bulls fans want O'Neal but Pacer fans may not be thrilled with the offers.

Due to salary matching it would have to be Hughes & Gooden OR Hughes & Nocioni.

If neither trade is acceptable, then the Bulls cant get him.
The gem cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without trials.
- -- Chinese proverb
Grang33r
Forum Mod - Pacers
Forum Mod - Pacers
Posts: 6,103
And1: 611
Joined: May 27, 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY

 

Post#23 » by Grang33r » Mon May 12, 2008 4:13 am

Not a chance Bird does either of those 2 deals.
The first rule of Basketball: Believe.
Follow on twitter @Grang33r
User avatar
greenway84
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,447
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 22, 2007

 

Post#24 » by greenway84 » Mon May 12, 2008 4:08 pm

Tommy Udo 6 wrote:Lots of Bulls fans want O'Neal but Pacer fans may not be thrilled with the offers.

Due to salary matching it would have to be Hughes & Gooden OR Hughes & Nocioni.

If neither trade is acceptable, then the Bulls cant get him.


Actually JO, Diogu for a Hinrich, Gooden, and S&T Duhon would work.
I personally would like to get a pick out of that as well though.
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 22,022
And1: 4,333
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

 

Post#25 » by basketballwacko2 » Tue May 13, 2008 10:31 am

Tommy Udo 6 wrote:Lots of Bulls fans want O'Neal but Pacer fans may not be thrilled with the offers.

Due to salary matching it would have to be Hughes & Gooden OR Hughes & Nocioni.

If neither trade is acceptable, then the Bulls cant get him.



How about JO, Tinsley, and Ike for Gooden, Hughes and Hinrich? I think that works, but I didn't check it.

Return to Indiana Pacers