Image

J.O. To Cleveland (Rumor Dispelled)

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

User avatar
APerna
Editor
Posts: 10,596
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Location: Running Down A Dream
Contact:

J.O. To Cleveland (Rumor Dispelled) 

Post#1 » by APerna » Thu Jun 5, 2008 11:03 pm

Discuss the rumor, that has been denied, of Jermaine to Cleveland here...

That's it...if another flame war starts, I don't care who was at fault from the beginning, there will be warnings, suspensions and the like.

Here's the initial report:
DraftExpress:

http://www.draftexpress.com/article/Wor ... t-Up-2915/

The Indiana Pacers are trying to dangle the #11 pick in hopes of being able to package it with one of their ugly contracts (preferably Jermaine O
+ PF
"If Jack makes that shot, the game is over." - Tommy Heinsohn after Jarrett Jack missed a shot at the buzzer of a 105-105 game between the Celtics and Pacers.
User avatar
IndieRuso420
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,593
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 01, 2004
Location: Indianapolis

 

Post#2 » by IndieRuso420 » Thu Jun 5, 2008 11:06 pm

At this point, the only reason I bring up trades is because of the draft. If you move JO now you can possibly get picks. If you don't move him now, and he gets injured again, then there is no shot at picks.

I am for keeping JO, but if he gets injured again I really be extremely upset and not surprised. However, if your going to move JO, move him now so we can can two possible first round picks to build around.
cdash
Analyst
Posts: 3,253
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2008

 

Post#3 » by cdash » Fri Jun 6, 2008 12:00 am

PacerPerspective, was it you who talked to Morway?
User avatar
count55
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,431
And1: 3
Joined: Dec 21, 2005
Location: In Memoriam: pf

 

Post#4 » by count55 » Fri Jun 6, 2008 12:05 am

Yes it was. (Well, it was his by-line.)
I have no idea what you're talking about, and clearly, neither do you.
FreeRon
Analyst
Posts: 3,147
And1: 5
Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Location: Louisville, KY

 

Post#5 » by FreeRon » Fri Jun 6, 2008 12:22 am

Did he say no to JO to Cleveland altogether or to the packaging of the pick with him?
cdash
Analyst
Posts: 3,253
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2008

 

Post#6 » by cdash » Fri Jun 6, 2008 1:04 am

The way I read it, it was just that rumor.
User avatar
count55
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,431
And1: 3
Joined: Dec 21, 2005
Location: In Memoriam: pf

 

Post#7 » by count55 » Fri Jun 6, 2008 1:40 am

Keep in mind that Givony was attributing it to JO's people, so it could be either positioning or wishful thinking on JO's (or someone close to him) part.
I have no idea what you're talking about, and clearly, neither do you.
User avatar
Smooth32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,282
And1: 8
Joined: Aug 15, 2005

 

Post#8 » by Smooth32 » Fri Jun 6, 2008 2:15 am

Cavs fan here (just stopping by)

I don't think that you can rule out the rumor because your GM said so... I think it's obvious that no GM would say yes to things behind the scenes...

With that said, he never said he wasn't/isn't shopping O'Neal but just rather said that the rumor of the deal was false... Which leads me to..

The whole deal was false and never something that DX suggested... If you read it carefully enough it says the Pacers were dangling the #11 pick if someone would take on O'Neal's (preferrably but any bad one) contract... And then later on it says that people out of O'Neal's camp think he might get traded to the Cavs... And then, after that, DX throws in something that they are suggesting makes sense and could happen... Not something they said would be the package...

So really I see only two facts in the trade: Cleveland has interest in O'Neal and the Pacers would be willing to trade the #11 pick, if the right package came along and took some bad contracts out of their hands... Those are the only two things that I think Givony meant... Not the whole crap of the #11 + O'Neal for Snow and Szcerbiak... That was the fabricated part of it and why Givony is unfortunately getting ripped (especially for something he never said was true)

Don't know if it helps but someone on a Cavs board (very, very reliable) has mentioned O'Neal to the Cavs throughout the offseason as the most likely trade to happen... So there is interest from both clubs but not word on what the package might be... Just speculation and, unfortunately, fabrication...
User avatar
count55
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,431
And1: 3
Joined: Dec 21, 2005
Location: In Memoriam: pf

 

Post#9 » by count55 » Fri Jun 6, 2008 2:43 am

Yeah, we're going to get a lot of people putting pieces together and coming up with their own scenario.
I have no idea what you're talking about, and clearly, neither do you.
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 22,022
And1: 4,333
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

 

Post#10 » by basketballwacko2 » Fri Jun 6, 2008 3:56 am

count55 wrote:Yeah, we're going to get a lot of people putting pieces together and coming up with their own scenario.



I'm expecting to see a blitz of garage sale type offers everyone who has a exp contract is gonna come in offering us their junk.

I say we should keep him unless someone offers something of value, we can't give up the #11 pick just move the guy for a couple of useless players like Wally and Snow. If the Cavs want JO were gonna need Varejoa, Joe Smith, Damon Jones and their pick plus the Chicago pick from next year. That's not quite enough salary from them to make it work I think.
ahartleyvu
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,352
And1: 60
Joined: May 01, 2007

 

Post#11 » by ahartleyvu » Fri Jun 6, 2008 4:41 am

IndieRuso420 wrote:At this point, the only reason I bring up trades is because of the draft. If you move JO now you can possibly get picks. If you don't move him now, and he gets injured again, then there is no shot at picks.

I am for keeping JO, but if he gets injured again I really be extremely upset and not surprised. However, if your going to move JO, move him now so we can can two possible first round picks to build around.


k we understand that you hate JO and it honestly seems like you hate the Pacers as well so I'm just wondering why you are here?
cdash
Analyst
Posts: 3,253
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 11, 2008

 

Post#12 » by cdash » Fri Jun 6, 2008 5:17 am

basketballwacko2 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-




I'm expecting to see a blitz of garage sale type offers everyone who has a exp contract is gonna come in offering us their junk.

I say we should keep him unless someone offers something of value, we can't give up the #11 pick just move the guy for a couple of useless players like Wally and Snow. If the Cavs want JO were gonna need Varejoa, Joe Smith, Damon Jones and their pick plus the Chicago pick from next year. That's not quite enough salary from them to make it work I think.


I agree with this...but I'm starting to wonder just how much JO wants out of Indiana. I think he is a good person (from all you read about him, he seems to be) and has great respect for the franchise that gave him a chance to play and made him a superstar...so I dont think he will go and publicly demand a trade. He has dropped hints to the media (even strong hints), but I wonder what he says to Pacers management. I, as a fan, would like to keep him if we are only going to get crappy offers for him, but if JO had came to Bird and said, "I want to be traded", that changes things a little. I still think that offers like Cleveland's arent the best we are going to get, but if management has decided they have to trade him, then we could potentially be trading him for what we, as fans, perceive below maximum value. It kind of puts our front office in a tough place, because they know Tinsley has to go and we arent going to get crap for him. Two trades where we get back crummy value might not inspire fans to come back to the Fieldhouse. Interesting offseason...
User avatar
Smooth32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,282
And1: 8
Joined: Aug 15, 2005

 

Post#13 » by Smooth32 » Fri Jun 6, 2008 5:30 am

basketballwacko2 wrote:
I say we should keep him unless someone offers something of value, we can't give up the #11 pick just move the guy for a couple of useless players like Wally and Snow. If the Cavs want JO were gonna need Varejoe, Joe Smith, Damon Jones and their pick plus the Chicago pick from next year. That's not quite enough salary from them to make it work I think.


If that's the case, the Cavs will pass very, very quickly... You can ask most Cav fans and at the most, (maybe) they would give up Wally and AV for JO because of the health risks... If it weren't for the health concerns, then without a doubt... But he injury concerns are a big thing... And especially coming off the Larry Hughes debacle, I think this makes the whole Cavalier organization very, very leery....
basketballwacko2
RealGM
Posts: 22,022
And1: 4,333
Joined: May 11, 2002
Location: Just outside of No where.
     

 

Post#14 » by basketballwacko2 » Fri Jun 6, 2008 6:32 am

I have no problem with the Cavs passing I don't expect a deal to get done JO is gonna have to come in here in the fall and play some basketball. The only way we can deal him is if someone has the faith in their medical examiners to give him a look and clear him. Then they have to be willing to take the risk of something going wrong or a recurance. I'd consider trading him for a package if someone really wants him, but who is gonna take the risk. The Wally and Joe Smith plus draft picks is the kinda thing I'd be looking at, Smith can hold down the PF for one more year and we might be able to deal Wally for some productive players at the dead line, maybe use him to get rid of Jamaal.

I don't believe like some have stated that JO is washed up or too crippled up to be effective, in the right system he could get you 20pts and 9 or 10 rbs and block 2 shots. That makes him a very baluable player, but he is a risk until someone sees him play 30 min a night and put up some numbers.

So I don't think he is getting traded.

Return to Indiana Pacers