Knicks/Pacers/Bucks trade

pacershereiam · Post #1 » by **pacershereiam** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:18 am

Indiana Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: 0.0 ppg, 0.0 rpg, and 0.0 apg.
Incoming Players
Charlie Bell
6-3 PG from Michigan State
No games yet played in 2007/08
Charlie Villanueva
6-10 PF from Connecticut
No games yet played in 2007/08
Ramon Sessions
6-4 PG from Nevada
No games yet played in 2007/08
Outgoing Players
Jamaal Tinsley
6-1 PG from Iowa State
No games yet played in 2007/08
Milwaukee Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: 0.0 ppg, 0.0 rpg, and 0.0 apg.
Incoming Players
Jared Jeffries
6-11 SF from Indiana
No games yet played in 2007/08
Nate Robinson
5-9 PG from Washington
No games yet played in 2007/08
Outgoing Players
Charlie Bell
6-3 PG from Michigan State
No games yet played in 2007/08
Charlie Villanueva
6-10 PF from Connecticut
No games yet played in 2007/08
Awvee Storey
6-6 SF from Arizona State
No games yet played in 2007/08
Ramon Sessions
6-4 PG from Nevada
No games yet played in 2007/08
New York Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: 0.0 ppg, 0.0 rpg, and 0.0 apg.
Incoming Players
Jamaal Tinsley
6-1 PG from Iowa State
No games yet played in 2007/08
Awvee Storey
6-6 SF from Arizona State
No games yet played in 2007/08
Outgoing Players
Jared Jeffries
6-11 SF from Indiana
No games yet played in 2007/08
Nate Robinson
5-9 PG from Washington
No games yet played in 2007/08

New York:
Tinsley
Crawford
Gallinerio
Randolph
Curry

Bucks:
Robinson
Redd
Jefferson
Gradzuric
Bogut

Pacers:
Ford
Dunleavy
Granger
Villanueva
Foster

Any thoughts? We might need to throw in a pf somewhere, but I think this is something that could get looked at. We might need to throw in a pick also.

xxSnEaKyPxx · Post #2 » by **xxSnEaKyPxx** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:55 am

Thats really bad for the Bucks.

Post #3 » by **APerna** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:02 am

We would never get those players for just Jamaal. That's a dream, dream scenario.

I'd probably mess my pants if that happened.

FreeRon · Post #4 » by **FreeRon** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 3:15 am

I can hardly read it, but too many players involved to ever happen even if the talent were equal.

GrandAdmiralDan · Post #5 » by **GrandAdmiralDan** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:50 am

DGrangeRx33 wrote:Thats really bad for the Bucks.

Yeah, that is absolutely terrible for the Bucks.

Even if it wasn't so bad, the last thing we need is yet another SF.

We just traded for SF Richard Jefferson, used the 8th pick to draft SF Joe Alexander, and used our 2nd round pick to draft Mbah A Moute. And at least at the moment, we also have SF Desmond Mason.
Likely we're already going to lose one of those SF in a trade. We're not going to bring in another one, especially Jeffries.

Post #6 » by **Scoot McGroot** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:42 pm

Yeah, the closest to reality we could do is a straight up Tinsley for Jeffries deal.

More Bang For The Bucks · Post #7 » by **More Bang For The Bucks** » Fri Jul 4, 2008 5:29 pm

Villanueva(potential) for Jeff Foster(win now for Bucks)?

Bucky O'Hare · Post #8 » by **Bucky O'Hare** » Fri Jul 4, 2008 5:41 pm

I'd probably do Foster for Villanueva. If somebody could ever get it stuck in Charlie's head that he needs to play defense, he could be a very good player. If not, he's a least a great 6th man. Of course I think Hibbert is gonna be out starting center for the future and could probably start as a rookie, so I see Foster as being somewhat expendable.