Wow, that's just sloppy reporting on this Josh Dhani's part.
He says the Pacers are looking to trade Tinsley for a first rounder (actually, he says Tinsley is looking to be traded for a first rounder, which is a complete grammatical mis-fire), but then he links this article:
http://blogs.indystar.com/pacersinsider ... he_cl.htmlWhich actually says:
Mike Wells wrote:Bird hasn't rule out trading for a second first-round pick.
"We have some options to do some things," he said. "You never really know until it gets up to the draft. We'll have some opportunities to do some things. If you can do some things and get two players that can help you, you'll have to look at it. There's a lot of things we're mulling over."
One player that likely won't be moved this week is locked-out point guard Jamaal Tinsley. The Pacers hope to move Tinsley before they go to arbitration at the end of July.
"Every day we talk about it, we contact teams," Bird said. "We're always putting feelers out there to see if we can get anything done."
The guy just completely screwed up the source material.
What the Indianapolis Star has found out is that (a) the Pacers are open to trading for another first round pick, and (b) Jamaal Tinsley probably won't be traded this week. That's almost diametrically opposed to what this blogger claimed.
embarrassing