IND-NOH (getting the starting PG)

Sebzor · Post #1 » by **Sebzor** » Mon Jul 5, 2010 12:07 pm

T. Murhpy/M. Dunleavy/T. Ford/B. Rush/P. George/L. Stephenson/future 1st
-for: C. Paul/E. Okafor/J. Posey/D. Songaila/future 2nd

NOH: get 3mass expiring contracts & 3young pieces (Rush/George/Stephenson) to pair up with Collison/Thornton/Wright/West + future 1st
IND: get starting PG + nice backup players, while keeping Granger/Hibbert/Hansbrough

jowglenn · Post #2 » by **jowglenn** » Mon Jul 5, 2010 12:27 pm

WHAT????

We give you all expirings to cover okafor and posey's contract, and give up rush, george, stephenson and a future 1st to get..

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I thought that was going to be collison. Ha. Whoops.

Yes, we'll do this, thank you.

Moooose · Post #3 » by **Moooose** » Mon Jul 5, 2010 12:38 pm

Wow. Maybe we could involve the GM's and the mascots as well?
I can't see the Pacers doing something so massive such as this. We only need a decent starting PG, not a whole new team.
Edit:
if we could somehow work a deal for Paul and our expirings and maybe Rush, that'd be great, but NO will surely ask for more. I don't think the Pacers would give away a couple of good picks. The Pacers are more likely looking for something less extravagant.

jowglenn · Post #4 » by **jowglenn** » Mon Jul 5, 2010 12:43 pm

True, we only NEED a decent starting PG.

But having an all-NBA gold-medal PG... that might be a bit better.

Moooose · Post #5 » by **Moooose** » Mon Jul 5, 2010 12:59 pm

jowglenn wrote:True, we only NEED a decent starting PG.

But having an all-NBA gold-medal PG... that might be a bit better.

Paul is in a different class, everyone knows that. But the Pacers will surely pay a very steep price just to get him. Not to mention he just had an awful injury-plagued season.

8305 · Post #6 » by **8305** » Tue Jul 6, 2010 1:08 pm

Pacers make this trade. Paul is a top ten player, Granger a top 20. Its not out of the question that a team built around these two could contend for a title.

Indy2thaWindy · Post #7 » by **Indy2thaWindy** » Tue Jul 6, 2010 1:14 pm

It is a deal if we can keep Lance. If it involves Lance, no deal.

jowglenn · Post #8 » by **jowglenn** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 11:42 am

Oh, 2thawindy, you are most certainly one of the most entertaining new people around here. 439 posts in about 3 weeks, half of them about lance stephenson. oh this will be fun.

basketballwacko2 · Post #9 » by **basketballwacko2** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 5:18 pm

jowglenn wrote:Oh, 2thawindy, you are most certainly one of the most entertaining new people around here. 439 posts in about 3 weeks, half of them about lance stephenson. oh this will be fun.

I'm hoping Lance is the real thing and becomes the next guy that people say "OH CRAP he went in the 2nd round!!"

But this Windy guy is starting to sound like Dew and the way he was about McLeod and Oomph was about Runi! :lol:

Granger da OG · Post #10 » by **Granger da OG** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 5:50 pm

I actually think Stephenson is better than say a jeryd bayless