http://hickory-high.com/2011/01/06/expe ... y-granger/
The post uses a stat I've been playing with called Expected Scoring. Basically it looks at a player's shot selection and calculates how many points he should be scoring if he shot the league average from each zone on the floor. Here's a few choice nuggets to stimulate some discussion:
For the first time in the past four seasons Danny Granger is averaging fewer point per 40 than expected. Never a terrific shooter at the rim or on long jumpers, his point differential has also declined into the negative range on three pointers and shots from 10-15ft. Altogether he is averaging 0.21 points less than expected per 40 minutes. This may not seem like much, but for a player who averaged 3.00 points more than expected per 40 minutes just two seasons ago, and one who is asked to carry such a huge offensive load for his team, this lack of efficiency is quite serious.
This season Granger has increasingly been forcing contested shots, one of the reasons he is shooting at career low percentages. One place we can see this is in the percentage of his shots which are assisted on.
Granger's Ast% has fallen to 54.4% a five year low for him. In addition his Ast% on shots at the rim and on three pointers are both career lows, 56.5% and 89.4% respectively. Too often he catches the ball on the perimeter, sizes up his defender and then rises for a contested jumpshot without even challenging the defense to move or adjust. His forced drives to the rim are contributing to his increase in turnovers as well. His Ast% on mid-range jumpers (10-15ft.) has risen steadily the past three seasons to 28.6%, but it's nowhere near the 45.2% it was during his All-Star campaign. We see the same thing with his Ast% on long two pointers (16-23ft.). The 41.0% he has posted this year is not a career low, but it's a far cry from the 54.2% he posted in 2008 or the 75.2% he posted in 2007.
I'd love to hear feedback if anyone has any thoughts on the matter.