Pacers @ Bulls- Saturday @ 1PM

Crossova21 · Post #1 » by **Crossova21** » Wed Apr 13, 2011 5:41 pm

Game is set for 1 on Saturday. Not sure which network but hopefully it'll be on ABC cuz I'm sick of Quinn Buckner.

Crossova21 · Post #2 » by **Crossova21** » Wed Apr 13, 2011 5:47 pm

Game's on ESPN.

Post #3 » by **Miller4ever** » Wed Apr 13, 2011 6:18 pm

I don't like the ABC crew. I really only like TNT's broadcast crew, and if Reggie gets to call a game, that would be appropriate. Kevin Harlan, Craig Sager, and of course the guys in the TNT studio are all a great bunch of guys.

taii1234 · Post #4 » by **taii1234** » Wed Apr 13, 2011 6:35 pm

I'm rooting for you guys to win this series, and so is everyone else in South Florida. Pyscho T!!!!

Indiana stand up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wizop · Post #5 » by **Wizop** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 3:39 am

here's the rest:

Chicago vs. Indiana

Game 1 - Sat April 16 Indiana at Chicago 12:00PM 1:00PM ESPN/ESPN3D
Game 2 - Mon April 18 Indiana at Chicago 8:30PM 9:30PM TNT
Game 3 - Thu April 21 Chicago at Indiana TBD TBD NBA TV
Game 4 - Sat April 23 Chicago at Indiana TBD TBD TNT
Game 5 * Tue April 26 Indiana at Chicago TBD TBD TBD
Game 6 * Thu April 28 Chicago at Indiana TBD TBD TBD
Game 7 * Sat April 30 Indiana at Chicago TBD TBD TNT

the didn't explain the times but I assume it is Chicago/Indy time.

SolidSnake008 · Post #6 » by **SolidSnake008** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 4:04 am

Good luck Fellas....You have a mountain to climb but i love the underdogs so good luck.....Hibbert and Granger are Key for you guys imo

Post #7 » by **Miller4ever** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 4:45 am

Nice to see that we are getting two TNT games at least.

Kuq_e_Zi91 · Post #8 » by **Kuq_e_Zi91** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:30 am

Getting Reggie to call a Pacers playoff game is a MUST! Preferably, one in Indiana.

Post #9 » by **Miller4ever** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:38 am

Game 4, when the Pacers are putting the finishing touches on our SWEEP.

SolidSnake008 · Post #10 » by **SolidSnake008** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 6:55 am

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndLL48rqkU4&feature=feedu[/youtube]

what do you guys think of this preview?

Post #11 » by **Gremz** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:58 am

I dunno. I think the plot was a bit thin and the characters were poorly selected.

Wizop · Post #12 » by **Wizop** » Thu Apr 14, 2011 9:46 pm

but you could dance to the intro so I'd give it an 85. okay, that's an obscure Band Stand reference and I'm probably the only one old enough to get my joke.

I thought all is individual analysis was excellent but I didn't think his conclusion flowed from it. if the individual match-ups go the way he projects, it could be closer than his prediction.

SolidSnake008 · Post #13 » by **SolidSnake008** » Fri Apr 15, 2011 4:31 am

Wizop wrote:but you could dance to the intro so I'd give it an 85. okay, that's an obscure Band Stand reference and I'm probably the only one old enough to get my joke.

I thought all is individual analysis was excellent but I didn't think his conclusion flowed from it. if the individual match-ups go the way he projects, it could be closer than his prediction.

i also thought this when i watched it

adjacent2bench · Post #14 » by **adjacent2bench** » Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:55 pm

This is gonna be a very competitive series. I don't think you guys are any pushover at all. Good luck Pacer fans.

writerman · Post #15 » by **writerman** » Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:15 pm

adjacent2bench wrote:This is gonna be a very competitive series. I don't think you guys are any
pushover at all. Good luck Pacer fans.

Nice to see someone is giving us some respect. People seem to forget we had a pretty impressive list of victories during the season over teams we weren't supposed to beat.

But being real, the Bulls are going to win this series, and they should. They at least for now are the better team. What really riles me is so many posters on the Bulls board who know little or nothing about us dissing our talent. I sincerely believe this Pacer team has the raw talent and depth to pull the upset--what they don't have are the chemistry, experience, or mindset as of yet and that's why they will lose, not because of any lack of talent.

In a year or two, I think it might be a much different story. Actually, player for player and in terms of depth, we match up pretty well other than with Rose--In terms of pure talent, I even give our frontcourt a slight edge overall. If we find some way to contain Rose--easier said than done, I know--it could be interesting.

fatboy1111 · Post #16 » by **fatboy1111** » Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:24 am

sweep, come on now................

Wizop · Post #17 » by **Wizop** » Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:11 am

writerman wrote:If we find some way to contain Rose--easier said than done, I know--it could be interesting.

there's a way. we have an old style Dale Davis no one is making layups on us attitude and the refs look the other way because its the playoffs. we just have to be more physical than they are and hope he doesn't get the star treatment. not saying it will happen that way, but if they let us treat Rose like New England treated Marvin, Chicago won't be happy.

YamiRain · Post #18 » by **YamiRain** » Sat Apr 16, 2011 3:29 pm

It'll be more interesting than you think guys...More Interesting...

My X Factors:Psycho T & Paul George

Hibbert and Granger need to put in work though.

Mainly, you need to stop korver, Stop him from daggers/